Guns and Drugs:A veiw on prohibition

[USFREEDOM911]

I'm 1/16 Wennebago myself.



This post is idiotic.

That was the point I was trying to make.
The correlation he was using, to jusrify his conclusion, was idiotic.

 

[Minister of Truth]

That was the point I was trying to make.
The correlation he was using, to jusrify his conclusion, was idiotic.

No it was not. Yours was idiotic.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

No it was not. Yours was idiotic.

No, it was not. His was idiotic.

 

[Minister of Truth]

No, it was not. His was idiotic.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I agree, his attempted correlation failed.
Thanks for the help.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

There were we differ. We of the peace movement say "Warring for peace is like fucking for virginity. The Idea that war or force could ever bring peace is a compleate oxymoron. The only way to bring peace is through Love.

peace through superior firepower. truest statement ever made.

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

No, it was not. His was idiotic.

How so? It was supposition, I'll readily admit that. But how was it idiotic if the Brits were more than willing to kill millions of people that shared much of their culture, were their neighbors, and in many cases had intermarried into British society, yet wouldn't stomach murdering millions of people half the world away?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

How so? It was supposition, I'll readily admit that. But how was it idiotic if the Brits were more than willing to kill millions of people that shared much of their culture, were their neighbors, and in many cases had intermarried into British society, yet wouldn't stomach murdering millions of people half the world away?

If your analogy makes sense, then so did mine.

 

[Minister of Truth]

If your analogy makes sense, then so did mine.

Braindead much? What happened to your reasoning skills?

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

If your analogy makes sense, then so did mine.

No.... you're didn't make sense to anyone but SM, who made the same analogy in another post. So how is it idiotic? A logical reason would be nice?

Hell, I'll give you one to work with. It does not equate because the Irish rebellion was a non-passive rebellion and the Indian rebellion was passive. Is that what you were going for?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

No.... you're didn't make sense to anyone but SM, who made the same analogy in another post. So how is it idiotic? A logical reason would be nice?

Hell, I'll give you one to work with. It does not equate because the Irish rebellion was a non-passive rebellion and the Indian rebellion was passive. Is that what you were going for?

You really don't see the problem in making a comparison to what occured during the East Indian rebellion against the British, what the Irish did and then saying that one supports an accusation against the results of the other??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Braindead much? What happened to your reasoning skills?

Then assist me and show me where my assertion is in error.

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

You really don't see the problem in making a comparison to what occured during the East Indian rebellion against the British, what the Irish did and then saying that one supports an accusation against the results of the other??

I already admitted I was speculating, but based on the evidence I have seen, yes the Brits would be willing to kill millions of both the Irish and the Indians during their rebellions.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I already admitted I was speculating, but based on the evidence I have seen, yes the Brits would be willing to kill millions of both the Irish and the Indians during their rebellions.

Then, since you agree with information that doesn't support each other; you must have no porblem with my assertion.

Thanks

 

[Minister of Truth]

USF, give it up. The Brits killed millions of Irish. You can't refute that, it happened. What phenomenon separated pacification of the Irish from that of the Indians? Modern media. Its the ONLY factor separating the two events.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

USF, give it up. The Brits killed millions of Irish. You can't refute that, it happened. What phenomenon separated pacification of the Irish from that of the Indians? Modern media. Its the ONLY factor separating the two events.

The only thing that binds the two sets of circumstances, are the British; but that doesn't mean that it woiuld occur.

Odd how you are so ready to buy into this connect the dots; but so completely regard my correlation, as being disjointed.

 

[Minister of Truth]

The only thing that binds the two sets of circumstances, are the British; but that doesn't mean that it woiuld occur.

Odd how you are so ready to buy into this connect the dots; but so completely regard my correlation, as being disjointed.

Because Britain would and did occupy both spheres. A person would not blow someone of either sex unless they are gay. Its the most retarded attempt at an analogy I've ever seen used on this site.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Because Britain would and did occupy both spheres. A person would not blow someone of either sex unless they are gay. Its the most retarded attempt at an analogy I've ever seen used on this site.

But just because they occupied both "speres", doesn't mean that they were willing to murder millions of East Indians to quell the opposition.

You're fishing.

 

[Minister of Truth]

But just because they occupied both "speres", doesn't mean that they were willing to murder millions of East Indians to quell the opposition.

You're fishing.

I said both spheres, not speres.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I said both spheres, not speres.

By all means; let's focus on a typo, instead of the matter at hand.

YOU LOSE!!