ANOTHER 'personal check' from James and Sara Biden to Joe Biden - this time for $40k

Sounds like..looks like... Comer has quite a bit of evidence..Solid evidence...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Then feel free to list them as I did.



The above is just more fallacy. This time it's an Argument from fallacy in the form of denying the antecedent. In 2018 Joke was openly saying he'd run for President in 2020. These payments could easily be construed as 'paying it forward.' That is some company with piles of cash or in need of a favor down the road makes an investment in 2018 thinking the payoff will come in 2020 if Biden is elected.



This is misconstrued. What we have is James receiving $200,000 from a failing health company we know he was trading on the Biden name with. Even he's admitted that. The day after he gets the cash, he turns around and gives it to his brother. The $40,000 check has a paper trail from a Chinese company Hunter was shaking down. Why did Hunter remit something like $100,000 to Jim Biden from that deal when Jim had nothing to do with it? From that money, he pocketed some of it, and sent Joe $40,000.

There's plenty of evidence of money laundering going on. There's plenty of evidence of quid pro quo too. Just because Joe wasn't in office doesn't preclude buying future political favors when it's known he's going to run for President and has a good chance of winning.
Click to expand...


You seem confused as to what people can find out easily on the internet
After months of deliberation, former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday announced his decision to run for president for a third time, answering one of the biggest outstanding questions about the makeup of the 2020 race.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/25/politics/joe-biden-2020-president/index.html
That is April of 2019.
Can you tell us when April of 2019 is compared to Jan of 2018?

So you are telling us that someone that hasn't even declared his intention to run let alone seems likely to run can be bribed in anticipation of when they win?
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/07/joe-biden-midterms-2020-elections-395927
he hasn’t set a timeline for deciding on a 2020 bid, let alone decided to run, according to four people who’ve spoken with him.
Feb of 2018.

It seems you think someone that hasn't said they are running and donors are not giving money to because he may not run is somehow worth bribing? You don't seem to understand logical fallacies.

Where is your evidence of that quid pro quo that you claim has plenty of evidence?
At this point all you have is the A Priori fallacy and the alternate truth fallacy.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You accuse me of fallacies when your argument is riddled with them.

2018. You are concluding that there was a favor granted at a time when no favor could be granted. How is it possible for someone not in office to grant a political favor?
What is the quid pro quo? You make shit up and then pretend it is true. Even if Joe got money from a corporation in 2018, which you have no evidence supporting that idiotic contention, there is no crime.

We have evidence of James Biden getting a $200,000 payment in Jan of 2018, then we have evidence of James Biden getting money 2 months later and using that money to pay back Joe Biden for a loan of $200,000.
Joe Biden is not in political office in 2018. The money James Biden received to pay back Joe is from 2018 when Joe Biden is not in political office. What political quid pro quo can Joe Biden provide in 2018 when Joe Biden is not in political office?
What possible political favors can Joe Biden provide when Joe Biden is not in political office in 2018?

Your argument is complete bullshit. Anyone with half a brain can see that. Do you have less than half a brain?
Click to expand...

Their bullshit argument is a severe act of desperation. If these claims had legs, then why aren't they pushing for indictments.
Until we have indictments, all we have is a big, fetid, miasmal pile of bullshit.

MAGAs wet panties

tenor.gif
Kamala-Harris-GIF.gif
 
archives said:
Not until it is proven more than coincidental or circumstantial evidence, which is all Comer/Jordan are echoing, you got to have proof, which they do not even after three years of fishing
Click to expand...

should we wait to see how Joe spent his bribe money?......I bet we can track some of his earliest bribes to a certain Corvette that was parked in the garage where he kept the classified documents he stole, right?......
 
Phantasmal said:
2018? Biden wasn’t in any position for a quid pro quo. Have they linked it to anything done during his time in office.
Click to expand...

so it is okay if he took a bribe so long as it was in between the time he was VP and the time he was POTUS?.....how about the bribes he took while he was a senator?....these only total $240k.......we have the rest of the $20M to go......
 
Nordberg said:
Comer wants to end the investigative clown show because he spent millions and came up empty. The Reds find the false stories useful in the election and want him to continue the bonfire of lies and innuendo. McCarthy admitted his endless investigations of Hillary were just to hurt her ratings. Comer is doing the same thing. It seems to bother Comer to keep doing fake investigations. McCarthy loved it.
Click to expand...

Exactly, all orchestrated by MaraLago attempting to rerun the 2016 election, make Biden look criminal so that Trump’s own seedy past can’t be used against him.

The House will impeach Biden, makes little difference there doesn’t exist any real evidence, it is all political theater, with the likes of Fox rerunning it 24/7
 
volsrock said:
Republicans unveil ANOTHER 'personal check' from James and Sara Biden to Joe Biden - this time for $40,000 - they say is part of an 'extortion scheme' with the Chinese


Chairman James Comer says the check labeled 'loan repayment' is actually 'laundered money' that can be traced back to the Chinese

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...time-40-000-say-extortion-scheme-Chinese.html


He makes a lot of loans:laugh:

Thats a total of 240k from his brother
Click to expand...

Why all the Whining and Birching on the Internet?

HIRE a GD LAWYER and take it to Court or STFU!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Then feel free to list them as I did.



The above is just more fallacy. This time it's an Argument from fallacy in the form of denying the antecedent. In 2018 Joke was openly saying he'd run for President in 2020. These payments could easily be construed as 'paying it forward.' That is some company with piles of cash or in need of a favor down the road makes an investment in 2018 thinking the payoff will come in 2020 if Biden is elected.



This is misconstrued. What we have is James receiving $200,000 from a failing health company we know he was trading on the Biden name with. Even he's admitted that. The day after he gets the cash, he turns around and gives it to his brother. The $40,000 check has a paper trail from a Chinese company Hunter was shaking down. Why did Hunter remit something like $100,000 to Jim Biden from that deal when Jim had nothing to do with it? From that money, he pocketed some of it, and sent Joe $40,000.

There's plenty of evidence of money laundering going on. There's plenty of evidence of quid pro quo too. Just because Joe wasn't in office doesn't preclude buying future political favors when it's known he's going to run for President and has a good chance of winning.
Click to expand...


“could be constructed,” not has been been proven, just “could be,” which is all anyone needs to know about that
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so it was okay that he accepted bribes because he hadn't been elected President yet?.......
Click to expand...

Not only was he not President, he wasn't running for President. He was on a book tour which was providing him millions and allowed him to loan his brother $200,000.

You can't claim getting a loan paid back is a bribe without some evidence of the money was from an illegal source and there was a quid pro quo.
Based on your stupid argument, we can claim Trump violated the emoluments clause in 2012 when he opened a Trump Tower in Saudi Arabia.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so it is okay if he took a bribe so long as it was in between the time he was VP and the time he was POTUS?.....how about the bribes he took while he was a senator?....these only total $240k.......we have the rest of the $20M to go......
Click to expand...

When are we going to deal with all the bribes you have taken when not in office?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top