A Conservative Case for Gay Marriage - Promoting American Values

[DamnYankee]

Then your argument as to denying them marriage to their partners based on promiscuity holds no water.

No, since hat assumes that there is a movement to promote lesbian marriage but not one for gay males; there isn't. And if there was, there are still the other issues involved.

 

[DamnYankee]

Southernman knows more about the sexual habits of gay men than Leno know's about late night talk.

What I know has been learned from you, the Board Faggot.

 

[WinterBorn]

No, since hat assumes that there is a movement to promote lesbian marriage but not one for gay males; there isn't. And if there was, there are still the other issues involved.

Since there is no standard for using promiscuity to deny marriage to straights, it is not an isseu to be used to deny gays.

The point you seem to be missing (or ignoring) is that you cannot have one set of standards for straights and one set for gays.

 

[DamnYankee]

We have one standard: marriage is between one man and one woman.

 

[WinterBorn]

We have one standard: marriage is between one man and one woman.

That standard will change.

I was referring to your varying standards used as excuses for denying gays the right to marry.

 

[DamnYankee]

Again, we have one standard. Plus they have to be of age, and not related to each other, etc.

 

[WinterBorn]

Again, we have one standard. Plus they have to be of age, and not related to each other, etc.

The standard of being of a certain age is to protect those who are too young to make a choice.

The standard of not being related to each other is based on the fact that incest increases the risks of birth defect by a significant margin.

But you have tried to use standards to deny marriage to gays that are not used to deny marriage to straights.

 

[DamnYankee]

Again, we have one standard. You want a double-standard. You must be gay.

 

[WinterBorn]

Again, we have one standard. You want a double-standard. You must be gay.

Wanting a double standard makes you gay?

You claim engaging in sodomy is a reason for denying marriage to gays, but there is no law against sodomy between straights, and they can marry.

You claim promiscuity is a reason for denying the right to marry to gays, but you admit straights are promiscuous too, just less so. And straights can marry.

YOu claim allowing gays to marry would damage the institution of marriage, and then admit that straights have done enough damage to the institution. But straights are still allowed to marry.





In otherwords, you claiming "You want a double-standard. You must be gay." after all the double standards you used, is the same as an admission that you are gay.

Glad to see you coming out of the closet.

 

[WinterBorn]

The above post is an example of "Pwnd", in case you were wondering.

 

[DamnYankee]

You must be a faggot for thinking like that.

 

[WinterBorn]

You must be a faggot for thinking like that.

I thought you would be angry that I forced you out of the closet. But hey, I am just using the rules you created here.

 

[DamnYankee]

You must be a faggot for thinking like that.

 

[WinterBorn]

You must be a faggot for thinking like that.

Proof you were pwnd

 

[DamnYankee]

You must be a faggot for thinking like that.

 

[DamnYankee]

:lol: Solitary goes ballistic when called gay in a thread where he supports queer marriage.

 

[WinterBorn]

:lol: Solitary goes ballistic when called gay in a thread where he supports queer marriage.

I understand. You want to move away from the "double standard = gay" debacle you just suffered. I don't blame you.

 

[DamnYankee]

Just one standard. You don't get to marry your boyfriend.

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

He's right SM, you have been thoroughly owned.

 

[DamnYankee]

He's right SM, you have been thoroughly owned.

Says you, a queer enabler.