A Conservative Case for Gay Marriage - Promoting American Values

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
Southern Man said:
Again, we have one standard. You want a double-standard. You must be gay.
Click to expand...

After all the double standards you posted, you make this statement? And then, in another thread, you go with the "man up and admit you are wrong" stuff?


Care to man up on this thread??
 
Southern Man said:
Double standard according to you, who's not willing to man-up and admit that you've been PWNED. :palm:
Click to expand...

Double standards by any sane description.

You have tried to use excuses to prevent gay marriage that are not used as any sort of standard for straight marriages.
 
Southern Man said:
Like the one man, one woman standard. :palm:
Click to expand...

Is that what I said?

Try rereading post #309.

Or, since your reading skills can be limited to what you want to read, let me repost part of it again:

"You claim engaging in sodomy is a reason for denying marriage to gays, but there is no law against sodomy between straights, and they can marry.

You claim promiscuity is a reason for denying the right to marry to gays, but you admit straights are promiscuous too, just less so. And straights can marry.

YOu claim allowing gays to marry would damage the institution of marriage, and then admit that straights have done enough damage to the institution. But straights are still allowed to marry."



Those are double standards.
 
Sodomy and masturbation are the only ways that queers have sex. Queers are a lot more promiscuous than straights. Queers would do way more damage than liberal attitudes about marriage have already done.

You're advocating throwing out the baby with the bathwater. I have no double standard as you claim. :)
 
Southern Man said:
Sodomy and masturbation are the only ways that queers have sex. Queers are a lot more promiscuous than straights. Queers would do way more damage than liberal attitudes about marriage have already done.

You're advocating throwing out the baby with the bathwater. I have no double standard as you claim. :)
Click to expand...

You claim that sodomy is justification for not allowing them to marry, but have not advocated not allowing straights who engage in sodomy to marry.

You claim that promiscuity is a reason for not allowing gays to marry, but admit that straights are promiscuous too, and do not advocate any restrictions on straights for their promiscuity.

YOu admit that straights have done damage to marriage, but claim that gay marriage would damage it more and thereby want it to remain illegal.

Those are all double standards. I am not advocating throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I am advocating one set of standards for everyone. If sodomy and promiscuity are justifications for not allowing gays to marry, then make them justifications for not allowing straights to marry as well.
 
Southern Man said:
Straw men. :)
Click to expand...

Absolutely not.

YOu want to use sodomy as a reason to deny marriage to one group but not another, that is not a straw man.

You want to use promiscuity to deny one group but not another, and you have drawn some arbitrary line of more promiscuous or less promiscuous. That is not a straw man.

You want to deny marriage based on the theoretical damages that will be done by one group, but admit the other group has done major harm to the institution, but do not want to deny them anything. That is not a straw man.
 
Southern Man said:
You made the assertions. Its now up to you to prove them not for me to prove them wrong. :)
Click to expand...

Its already been shown.

You made the claim that sodomy is a reason for denying gays the right to marry.

You made the claim that promiscuity is a reason for denying gays the right to marry.



I just called you on the double standard because you have not advocated straights being held to the same standard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top