The “well regulated militia” at it again

archives said:
Yeah, packing would have saved all those people massacred in Vegas, the kids in Newton or Uvalde, senior citizens in Lewiston, etc., etc., etc
Click to expand...

1. the only one that KNOWS there's going to be gun fire is the bad guy
2. be prepared is more than just a boy scout motto
3. if teachers had been packing in newton or uvalde, the body count would have been much lower.

it's already been established that the uvalde shooter chose his environment due to lack of security. so imagine how many less targets there would be if the intended shooter knows he's going to be confronted with a gun
 
Bigdog said:
So now that Black Americans share the right to bear arms, ... white libs want to take that right away from them. :palm:

It was never a problem for the Dems before Blacks got the right.
Click to expand...

Now that’s a stretch, erroneous, but still comical, no, no one is taking a right from anyone, rather, regulating that right, for everyone, and check your own posts, you are the one having the problem with Blacks having guns
 
SmarterthanYou said:
oh, oh, here we go again. the ONLY reason you want rights based on reason instead of desire is that you are terrified of the freedom of others. You need to have government with an ability to regulate and control those around you so you are less fearful of your surroundings. And as i've already told you, States have been given the power to regulate their roadways.

why you nanny state authoritarians continue trying to hyperbolize anything remotely associated with rights you don't like is a mystery.
Click to expand...

Ah, ah rights are based, and work, because they are based upon reason, not desire, otherwise we would have complete anarchy without any consensus

States, Federal, whatever, the fact is that you have surrendered your freedom to drive any side of the road you want because of reason, it makes more sense and is the most efficient means of getting anywhere, it is a simple concept you just can’t comprehend
 
archives said:
Now that’s a stretch, erroneous, but still comical, no, no one is taking a right from anyone, rather, regulating that right, for everyone, and check your own posts, you are the one having the problem with Blacks having guns
Click to expand...

Wrong, I want law abiding Black Americans to be armed to the teeth against the epidemic of white supremacist mobs. A homeowner needs a lot of fire power to protect their family against a flash mob.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
1. the only one that KNOWS there's going to be gun fire is the bad guy
2. be prepared is more than just a boy scout motto
3. if teachers had been packing in newton or uvalde, the body count would have been much lower.

it's already been established that the uvalde shooter chose his environment due to lack of security. so imagine how many less targets there would be if the intended shooter knows he's going to be confronted with a gun
Click to expand...

Impossible to defend all potential targets, way too many, just like it is impossible to identify the next shooter, only variable you can control is what makes it all possible, the gun

And there were guns at Uvalde, hundreds, right outside the door, and yet it didn’t stop the continuing massacre of children. If what you say were true, Texas would be the safest State in the country, everyone carries, yet in reality it is Connecticut, where gun laws are strict
 
Bigdog said:
Wrong, I want law abiding Black Americans to be armed to the teeth against the epidemic of white supremacist mobs. A homeowner needs a lot of fire power to protect their family against a flash mob.
Click to expand...

Yeah them flash mobs have been shooting up everything
 
archives said:
Yeah them flash mobs have been shooting up everything
Click to expand...

Are you mocking Black Americans and calling Biden's DHS liars?

"DHS draft document: White supremacists are greatest threat ...

Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2020/09/04 › white...
Sep 4, 2020 — But all three drafts describe the threat from white supremacists as the deadliest domestic terror threat facing the U.S., listed above the ..."
 
volsrock said:
So u support taking the tool away from the cop that shot Ashli Babbitt?


Yes or No
Click to expand...

No.

Law enforcement needs to be armed so blatant threatening criminals like Babbitt can be shot.

We support that mob of insurrectionists not allowed to be armed, though.

Can you see the distinction?
 
QP! said:
No.

Law enforcement needs to be armed so blatant threatening criminals like Babbitt can be shot.

We support that mob of insurrectionists not allowed to be armed, though.

Can you see the distinction?
Click to expand...

Only in who YOU think are the “good guys” and who YOU think are the “bad guys.” You probably would like for LEO’s here (almost 100% conservatives) to be disarmed.
 
QP! said:
No.

Law enforcement needs to be armed so blatant threatening criminals like Babbitt can be shot.

We support that mob of insurrectionists not allowed to be armed, though.

Can you see the distinction?
Click to expand...


So just like NK and Afghanistan.....got it....if Babbitt has no gun the cops dont need a gun


And no armed body guards for members of congress etc






So I cant protect my home from blatant threatening criminals? I have to wait 15 mins or more on the cops to show up
 
Last edited:
leaningright said:
Only in who YOU think are the “good guys” and who YOU think are the “bad guys.” You probably would like for LEO’s here (almost 100% conservatives) to be disarmed.
Click to expand...

The 'good guys' are the ones defending the Capital and those within it. The bad guys are the Insurrectionists.

If you struggle with this question you are part of the problem.
 
volsrock said:
So just like NK and Afghanistan.....got it....if Babbitt has no gun the cops dont need a gun


And no armed body guards for members of congress etc






So I cant protect my home from blatant threatening criminals? I have to wait 15 mins or more on the cops to show up
Click to expand...

Be less stupid and reply to what i actually wrote and not your demented fan fiction.


if i say a POTUS SS should be armed but those who meet with the POTUS should not be armed do not pretend i am commenting on your right to be armed at your home. Just be less stupid.
 
volsrock said:
So get rid of the Secret Service tool? ....... Since its useless in protecting Biden/Obama and their family



And the tool that the cop used to protect Pence from the very dangerous Ashli Babbitt


Just think she would have killed Pence if not for that tool
Click to expand...

That’s not what we’re talking about though, is it, Jethro?
 
leaningright said:
Exhibit A: The real plan of all anti gun people whether they come right out and say it or not. Props to domer for being forthright.
Click to expand...

You right wingers can’t refute the notion that guns are just not needed in a modern society. Many other first world countries do just fine without them.

So, with your support, we’ll just have to continue to put up with 40,000-50,000 needless deaths every year.

Those families appreciate your participation
 
domer76 said:
You right wingers can’t refute the notion that guns are just not needed in a modern society. Many other first world countries do just fine without them.

So, with your support, we’ll just have to continue to put up with 40,000-50,000 needless deaths every year.

Those families appreciate your participation
Click to expand...

Without them? Many?

What countries would that be.. without guns?
 
Last edited:
archives said:
Ah, ah rights are based, and work, because they are based upon reason, not desire, otherwise we would have complete anarchy without any consensus
Click to expand...
wrong

archives said:
States, Federal, whatever, the fact is that you have surrendered your freedom to drive any side of the road you want because of reason, it makes more sense and is the most efficient means of getting anywhere, it is a simple concept you just can’t comprehend
Click to expand...
wrong. reason does not take away desire. the concept you can't seem to grasp is that individual rights are not up for debate to majority rule, nor judicial fiat. reasonable people can rationalize that to make things work better, some things need to be regulated, but these things are not people, only inanimate objects
 
archives said:
Impossible to defend all potential targets, way too many, just like it is impossible to identify the next shooter, only variable you can control is what makes it all possible, the gun
Click to expand...
yet the ONLY way you seem to believe it can be done is restricting and denying the rights of citizens because they MIGHT become the next shooter, yet tens of MILLIONS of people don't shoot others on a daily basis.

archives said:
And there were guns at Uvalde, hundreds, right outside the door, and yet it didn’t stop the continuing massacre of children. If what you say were true, Texas would be the safest State in the country, everyone carries, yet in reality it is Connecticut, where gun laws are strict
Click to expand...
those 'hundreds' of guns were in the hands of who??????????? let me know if you need help answering that question
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top