BLM leader endorses Trump

Right, well Republicans are great friends of BLM, so there is that.

Which makes it more surprising that a BLM leader would support DJT. Duh! That is the whole point that you apparently missed. :palm:

BLM is a racist farce and this guy figured it out.

Just like Richard Spencer, creator of the Alt White, switched his vote to Biden after figuring out DJT is not a lifelong neo nazi skinhead as the Left claimed.
 
Last edited:
Which makes it more surprising that a BLM leader would support DJT. Duh! That is the whole point that you apparently missed. :palm:

BLM is a racist farce and this guy figured it out.

Just like Richard Spencer, creator of the Alt White, switched his vote to Biden after figuring out DJT is not a lifelong neo nazi skinhead as the Left claimed.

Here is the man himself saying he supports Trump because all the rest are just useless.

 
The leader of the RI chapter of BLM is endorsing trump for president. Why?

"Because everybody else sucks," Fisher responded, prompting a chuckle from Iversen. "You know, I like Trump personally and I think right now who we have sitting in the Oval Office is just a deep disappointment ... I deeply have disdain for him and I really dislike the vice president [Kamala Harris] as well."

Also:

"I feel like the tide is starting to turn," Fisher said. "I feel like a lot of Black people are starting to pivot off of that Democratic plantation. For so long, we've been slaves to that party. Actually, we've been mental slaves, afraid to get off of that plantation."

"That party ... they don't value our vote," he continued. "Their policies are basically racist policies. I believe that it's a racist party that strikes at the heart of the Black family and the nuclear family in general. And I believe Donald Trump, he's the opposite."


I guess this guy ain't black.

https://www.newsweek.com/black-lives-matter-leader-endorses-trump-everybody-else-sucks-1842100

Remember the news story about the former Obama official who verbally attacked a Muslim food vendor? It doesn't matter who you represent or who you used to work for - some people are just assholes.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Bloody hell! And they were wrong ... just like left & right media outlets bought into the lies regarding the invasion of Iraq hook, line & sinker....save for the true progressive investigative journalist like Pacifica Broadcast.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...07#post5873007



Are Snopes wrong as well?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/black-lives-matter-leader-endorses-trump/

Are you fucking stupid or what? IT'S A BOGUS STORY, YOU NIT! Just like every major news outlet on both sides of the political fence carried the lies of the Iraq invasion (save for true progessive WBAI Pacifica Broadcast). Check the link to the article others provided.
 
And in the grand scheme of things, it's ironic that the MAGA/alt-right wonks take ANYTHING that comes out of the mouths of various BLM members and leaders seriously. I mean, if you totally disregard BLM in general as bogus organization, why orgasm about some silly ass sell out endorsing the Orange Oaf?

Can you say "hypocrites" boys and girls? Sure you can, I knew you could. ;)
 
Are you fucking stupid or what? IT'S A BOGUS STORY, YOU NIT! Just like every major news outlet on both sides of the political fence carried the lies of the Iraq invasion (save for true progessive WBAI Pacifica Broadcast). Check the link to the article others provided.

What the fuck does Iraq have to do with the price of fish, bozo? Is Snopes wrong or not, if you think so then why have you used them so many times in the past?
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Are you fucking stupid or what? IT'S A BOGUS STORY, YOU NIT! Just like every major news outlet on both sides of the political fence carried the lies of the Iraq invasion (save for true progessive WBAI Pacifica Broadcast). Check the link to the article others provided.


What the fuck does Iraq have to do with the price of fish, bozo? Is Snopes wrong or not, if you think so then why have you used them so many times in the past?

It's confirmed....YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID! Either that or you're drunk or you need a serious refresher course in English Composition and reading comprehension. Or you're playing dumb just to avoid conceding a point

What are the first two words of my third sentence, genius?

And when news sources get it wrong, I call them on it. No one is 100% correct all the time, you know. Unlike you and your cohorts, I don't blindly support someone even if I've agreed with them in the past.

Now hold onto your knickers, because here comes a comparison again.

Remember when the NY Times carried Judith Miller's reporting that lead up to the invasion of Iraq? They treated it like gospel truth, with little to no back checking. However, numerous "alternative" (now known as progressives) told another tale, along with some independent investigative reporters and foreign news services. Eventually, Miller was exposed as a fraud, and the NYT's credibility took a hit.

ALL THIS WAS AFTER YEARS OF THE RIGHT WING PUNDITS AND POLITICIANS CATEGORIZING THE NYT AS A LIBERAL BIASED PAPER.

Now, flip the script, move the time table and change the label and you have the Snopes article as now discussed. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-mark-fisher-video-claim-explored/ar-AA1kXyag

Got that, bunky? Sheesh! :palm:
 
Back
Top