You shouldn't need to remember him to have learned what we did in and to Vietnam, and to many thousands of our citizens by sending them there. Kissinger was the architect in chief.
My daughter in law and her family, who are from Saigon, can give you chapter and verse on what the VietMinh did after 1975 to innocent people. But naturally you only want to talk about the Yanquis, not bastards like Uncle Ho.
[FONT=&]Many residents of Saigon, the former South Vietnamese capital, were forced to move to the countryside to work on collective farms. This soon resulted in a famine because the useless VietMinh didn't have a clue how to run a successful economy.
Many more were sent to reeducation camps or were tortured and then executed. [/FONT]
The name Saigon was cancelled.
Just who the FUCK do you think you are?
Who made that stupid rule? If people are evil, that doesn’t change when they die, and I’m not in contact with his family, so I don’t need to respect their loss.Never speak ill of the recently deceased. There's plenty of time for that later...
That aside, Spencer Ackerman, the author of the OP article is about as radical a Leftist as you can get. Of course, this Leftist jackass would viciously attack Kissinger with a whole plethora of logical fallacies and ill-logic since he knows no better. Trying to pin such events as Pol Pot in Cambodia, Pinochet in Chile, et al., is utter nonsense that only the fevered delusions of a radical Leftist could dream up.
Spencer gives faint praise to Kissinger on a number of issues, always making sure to find some fault that dismisses it as not Kissinger's doing. His article is full of shit from start to finish.
This absurd sentence sums up Spencer's idiocy perfectly:
America, like every empire, champions its state murderers.
Who made that stupid rule? If people are evil, that doesn’t change when they die, and I’m not in contact with his family, so I don’t need to respect their loss.
Kissinger was evil. There is no need to speak well of him, ever.
Fanlight Phanny, predictable as always. It's crazy how the usual suspects condemn the likes of Kissinger but conveniently forget how the Russians and Chinese behaved back then.
When was he President?
1837
Fact is he wasn't..he never ordered the US to do anything!
1435
At least Henry wasn't a Pedo like King Rama-Lama-Ding-Dong of Thailand.