It didn't stand.
Still standing.
It didn't stand.
Deutsche bank just admitted that the documents Trump submitted were fraudulent since they didn't believe them to be true.
Trump is guilty of submitting fraudulent documents. Deutsche bank just confirmed it.
Still standing.
The victim of what?
Wrong . Set aside "pending further review". I've provided the link to that fact twice already.
Hilarious how hysterical you and yours are over the attempted railroading of Trump is coming undone due to the ACTUAL FACTS COMING TO LIGHT.
James and the judge are who should be facing prosecution, for their total disregard for the law.
That is how Stalinist show trials go, and this is a Stalinist show trial.
Why would a bank decide values when someone is getting property insurance?
Why would a bank decide values when someone is disputing the value for tax purposes?
There are plenty of Magatards that are desperate for a bit of good news when it comes to their messiah, that they will fabricate their own reality.
It is a common practice of both buyers and sellers of real estate. The lender often requires LOAN INSURANCE, but that is not home owners/property insurance.
Offers and counter offers.
Apparently, none of the JPP left have ever owned a home.
Total ,lie. The exec said that they always have to adjust clients estimates. You've obviously never owned a home.
Read the banker's testimony, and stop making up bullshit.
And the ILLEGAL summary judgement has been set aside, until ALL THE FACTS are known, since the testimony from Deutsche Bank; any other lender of Trump's will testify the same thing.
Sellers overestimate, buyers try to underestimate.
Standard business = why "negotiations" were invented.
The local left is cloming unglued over this nonsense case coming unglued.
It would seem that with the Progressive Leftists and Democratics that populate this board they either live in a single-wide down in the low rent trailer park or their mom's basement...
It's clear you have never taken out a business loan with a covenant that requires you to give annual financial statements.
But then you consistently prove you don't know you ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to most subjects.
It is a common practice of both buyers and sellers of real estate. The lender often requires LOAN INSURANCE, but that is not home owners/property insurance.
Offers and counter offers.
Apparently, none of the JPP left have ever owned a home.
Deutsche bank just admitted that the documents Trump submitted were fraudulent since they didn't believe them to be true.
Trump is guilty of submitting fraudulent documents. Deutsche bank just confirmed it.
Filing a false appraisal with an insurance company is fraud.
Claiming a false value for tax purposes is fraud.
In neither case will a bank need to appraise the property.
This isn't about owning a home. It is about providing financial statements that truly reflect your net worth.
Clearly you have never had to provide your net worth for any purpose. Perhaps you shouldn't accuse others of something when anyone that has a net worth over $200,000 can clearly see you are full of shit.
Filing a false appraisal with an insurance company is fraud.
Claiming a false value for tax purposes is fraud.
In neither case will a bank need to appraise the property.
This isn't about owning a home. It is about providing financial statements that truly reflect your net worth.
Clearly you have never had to provide your net worth for any purpose. Perhaps you shouldn't accuse others of something when anyone that has a net worth over $200,000 can clearly see you are full of shit.
It's clear you have never taken out a business loan with a covenant that requires you to give annual financial statements.
But then you consistently prove you don't know you ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to most subjects.
For fraud to occur, there has to be a loss on the part of the lender. You can say whatever you want, the bank has a duty to do due diligence, and if the loan is repaid in full, there is no fraud. If you think anything else is the case, you are a retard.
ROFLMAO.
I did read the testimony. Would you care to point out where they said they didn't have to adjust it because it was correct?
The judgement is not set aside. The dissolution of his companies is stayed while it is on appeal. Judgements are not set aside simply because an appeal is filed. A judgement can't be set aside until the appeals court rules.