Democrats doing more crazy f***** up shit

S

SmarterthanYou

rebel
https://gazette.com/news/wex/washin...cle_90898d32-077f-5afe-868d-321e0cccb416.html

A Washington bill would require a convicted sex offender be among the members of the State Sex Offender Policy Board, which would also be renamed “Sex Offense Policy Board.”

House Bill 2177 sponsored by Rep. Tarra Simmons, D-Bremerton, would also require a victim of a sex offense serve in an effort to “diversify” the number of backgrounds represented on the board.
 
https://www.news5cleveland.com/news...ens-inequality-makes-us-less-safe-report-says

Mass incarceration deepens inequality, makes us less safe, report says

In Ohio and other states, the number of people locked up in jails and prisons has increased dramatically over the past four decades.

Many, including Ohio, are taking steps to reduce those numbers. But they remain stubbornly high. And that only feeds income inequality and lessens public safety, according to a report released last week by the Sentencing Project, a Washington, D.C.-based research and advocacy center.

the insanity of the left appears to be accelerating
 
maryland democrats demand $300k liability insurance for citizens who carry guns

Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
maryland democrats demand $300k liability insurance for citizens who carry guns

Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.
Click to expand...

Every state should do this. You need insurance to drive a car. Every state should also ban anyone convicted of a DUI or any alcohol related crime from owning a gun. You call it insanity, I call it common sense.
 
Concart said:
Every state should do this. You need insurance to drive a car. Every state should also ban anyone convicted of a DUI or any alcohol related crime from owning a gun. You call it insanity, I call it common sense.
Click to expand...

requiring insane amounts of money to afford to exercise a right is not common sense, you ignorant fuck. it's tyranny. time for you to accept the fact that you do indeed want authoritarianism.
 
We hate you asshole


Climb into the sewer where you belong you racist Russian loving ass boil



LOSER
 
SmarterthanYou said:
requiring insane amounts of money to afford to exercise a right is not common sense, you ignorant fuck. it's tyranny. time for you to accept the fact that you do indeed want authoritarianism.
Click to expand...

No, I want you to carry insurance on your firearm in case you miss the mailbox and hit an innocent bystander. Which seems likely. Where does your logic end? I'll tell you.

FREE GUNS SHOULD BE A RIGHT FOR EVERY AMERICAN.

It's one of the dumbest arguments I've ever seen.
 
Concart said:
No, I want you to carry insurance on your firearm in case you miss the mailbox and hit an innocent bystander. Which seems likely. Where does your logic end? I'll tell you.

FREE GUNS SHOULD BE A RIGHT FOR EVERY AMERICAN.

It's one of the dumbest arguments I've ever seen.
Click to expand...

the DUMBEST argument is you wanting me, or any other constitutionalist, to carry liability insurance for our mistakes while you sit back and support qualified immunity for goverment agents who do the same........THAT is the dumbest fucking argument EVER!!!!!!

but then, you are an authoritarian feminist who prefers delusion over reality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top