E Jean Carroll case raises important question. Has a woman EVER BEEN RAPED?

Trump was not convicted in criminal court
but found liable for sexual misconduct in civil court.

Thus, the courts decided that the plaintiff was NOT lying.

Thus, Trump is also guilty of defamation if he claims that she is.

Carroll called trump a rapist on national tv. He was never convicted criminally for that, nor did the civil trial say he raped carroll. But the courts said he can't sue her for defamation?
 
Are all these "victims" lying.? Jeanie has no evidence. Can't even tell us the year it happened. Statute of Limitations had runout. But she gets $83 million! False rape accusations are everywhere today. Women know all they have to do is make an accusation and if the guy has money, they'll get a fortune.

She has contemporaneous witnesses. These are people she told at the time of the assault who were found to be credible by the judge and jury. Your problem is not with Carroll, it's with the U.S. justice system. If you don't like it, move to Russia.
 
She didn’t get $83 million over rape accusations, rather, defamation, Donnie was told to keep his mouth shut but he couldn’t help himself when in front of a microphone even after being warned, about time he learned words count

And Breitfart”s video question is funny, copied Alex Jones when he said Sandy Hook didn’t happen because there didn’t exist actual video of the children being massacred

Alex Jones' lawyers also fucked up during the trial and provided documentation to the prosecution where there was his confession he knew he was lying.
 
Last edited:
She has contemporaneous witnesses.

False, she can't even say what year it was.

These are people she told at the time of the assault who were found to be credible by the judge and jury. Your problem is not with Carroll, it's with the U.S. justice system. If you don't like it, move to Russia.

No one knows what the time or date of the alleged incident was.

This was a political lynching. Nothing more.
 
False, she can't even say what year it was.



No one knows what the time or date of the alleged incident was.

This was a political lynching. Nothing more.

If you can prove that the judge, jury and witnesses were all Democratic operatives, I'll listen to your. Otherwise your post reflects nothing but right wing, paranoid propaganda.

Also, there were contemporaneous witnesses. People Carroll discussed the assault with at the time.
 
No they are not witnesses, you liar. They weren't there. They didn't witness anything.

I'm not lying. There were people she told at the time of the assault who the jury found credible. Deal with it. E. Jean is one of the many women Trump has assaulted.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/05/trump-rape-trial-witness-tracker-00095179

" she said she told two friends right away but never told anyone else until 2019, when the “Me Too” movement inspired her to publicize her account."

"Lisa Birnbach
A writer and longtime friend of Carroll

WHAT SHE SAID
She testified that Carroll called her in the early evening one spring night in 1996 and told her that she had just left Bergdorf, where she had encountered Trump, who assaulted her in a dressing room, pulling down her tights and penetrating her with his penis. Birnbach said she told Carroll that Trump had raped her and advised her to report the incident to the police."

"Carol Martin
A retired journalist and a longtime friend and former co-worker of Carroll

WHAT SHE SAID
According to Martin, Carroll came to her a day or two after the alleged incident and told her about it. “She said, ‘Trump attacked me,’” Martin said, recalling that Carroll was visibly upset. “I was completely floored,” Martin said. She said she cautioned Carroll against taking any steps in response to the incident “because it was Donald Trump and he had a lot of attorneys and he would bury her.”

So not only did Carroll tell these two witnesses, this goes to show why Carroll didn't come forward right away.. it was for fear that Trump would take her to court and defame her. Which he HAS done.
 
Last edited:
I'm not lying. There were people she told at the time of the assault who the jury found credible. Deal with it. E. Jean is one of the many women Trump has assaulted.
That isn't evidence, you idiot. They said that because they want some of the loot.

There is no evidence trump assaulted anyone . You want evidence look at these videos of Joe the Pedophile Vegetable molesting little girls.

 
That isn't evidence, you idiot. They said that because they want some of the loot.

There is no evidence trump assaulted anyone . You want evidence look at these videos of Joe the Pedophile Vegetable molesting little girls.

[;V4PLSPvJ9BY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4PLSPvJ9BY[/video]

It's gross that you get turned on showing that video over and over.

E. Jean's Carroll's witnesses didn't get any "loot". Had that occurred Trump's defense attorney would have presented that evidence at trial. A judge and jury found Trump liable for Carroll's assault.
 
1%20(20).jpg
 
Trump raped and abused women his whole adult life. Therefore those are no longer crimes, but aspirations. Biden has a stuttering problem, Trump has grab women by the pussy problem. They are the same thing equal in the eyes of Trump's followers.
 
If you can prove that the judge, jury and witnesses were all Democratic operatives, I'll listen to your.

Carroll testified that she didn't know the date or time.

The jury already knows.

They found the defendant guilty of being Donald Trump. That was the crime he was actually charged with.

Otherwise your post reflects nothing but right wing, paranoid propaganda.

Also, there were contemporaneous witnesses. People Carroll discussed the assault with at the time.

NO ONE disputes the fact that Carroll doesn't know the time or date (too easy to refute if a specific date is given.)

{[FONT=&quot]“This question, the when, the when, the date, has been something I’ve constantly trying to pin down,” Carroll said.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]At first she said she thought it was 1994 or 1995, but she said her friend Lisa Birnbach published an article about Trump for New York magazine in February 1996.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“Lisa never would have gone down to Mar-a-Lago … if she knew what Donald Trump had done to me,” Carroll said, leading her to believe the alleged attack occurred in 1996.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]In her opening statement, Carroll attorney Shawn Crowley suggested the lack of specificity doesn’t matter.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“While Ms. Carroll doesn’t remember exactly when this happened, she remembers almost every detail of what happened, and her testimony alone will be enough for you to find Donald Trump liable in this case,” Crowley said.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The defense told the jury those details matter.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“She can’t tell you the date that she claims to have been raped. She can’t tell you the month that she claims to have been raped. She can’t tell you the season. She can’t even tell you the year that she claims to have been raped by Donald Trump,” defense attorney Joe Tacopina said during his opening statement.}

https://www.wxhc.com/e-jean-carroll...she-cant-recall-date-of-alleged-trump-attack/


[/FONT]
 
I'm not lying. There were people she told at the time of the assault who the jury found credible. Deal with it. E. Jean is one of the many women Trump has assaulted.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/05/trump-rape-trial-witness-tracker-00095179

" she said she told two friends right away but never told anyone else until 2019, when the “Me Too” movement inspired her to publicize her account."

So, it WASN'T "at the time" as you claimed - but in 2019 iin order to tag along on the "Me Too" witch trials AND attack a political enemy.

"Lisa Birnbach
A writer and longtime friend of Carroll

WHAT SHE SAID
She testified that Carroll called her in the early evening one spring night in 1996 and told her that she had just left Bergdorf, where she had encountered Trump, who assaulted her in a dressing room, pulling down her tights and penetrating her with his penis. Birnbach said she told Carroll that Trump had raped her and advised her to report the incident to the police."

That is a direct lie.

{[FONT=&quot]At first she said she thought it was 1994 or 1995, but she said her friend Lisa Birnbach published an article about Trump for [/FONT]New York[FONT=&quot] magazine in February 1996.}
[/FONT]

Carroll testified under oath that she doesn't even know what year the alleged attack took place (because she made it up in 2019)

"Carol Martin
A retired journalist and a longtime friend and former co-worker of Carroll

WHAT SHE SAID
According to Martin, Carroll came to her a day or two after the alleged incident and told her about it. “She said, ‘Trump attacked me,’” Martin said, recalling that Carroll was visibly upset. “I was completely floored,” Martin said. She said she cautioned Carroll against taking any steps in response to the incident “because it was Donald Trump and he had a lot of attorneys and he would bury her.”

So not only did Carroll tell these two witnesses, this goes to show why Carroll didn't come forward right away.. it was for fear that Trump would take her to court and defame her. Which he HAS done.

Came to her a day or two after - despite no one knowing what year it was.

What a load of shit.
 
Trump raped and abused women his whole adult life. Therefore those are no longer crimes, but aspirations. Biden has a stuttering problem, Trump has grab women by the pussy problem. They are the same thing equal in the eyes of Trump's followers.

You misspelled "Joe Biden."


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-accuser-tara-reade-sues-doj-seeks-millions-damages

Funny, unlike Ejean, Tara know the EXACT date and year that Biden raped her.

Why did the STASI threated Reade to silence her?
 
NO ONE disputes the fact that Carroll doesn't know the time or date (too easy to refute if a specific date is given.)

Absolutely. Trump is an international businessmen. With a specific date he might have shown he was not even in the country.! The lawyers for carroll told her to vague about the date.
 
Carroll called trump a rapist on national tv. He was never convicted criminally for that, nor did the civil trial say he raped carroll. But the courts said he can't sue her for defamation?

Correct.

We had a Judge Finding of FACT that in fact Trump did rape her.

Trump tried to sue E Jean for saying she was raped, and we need to understand what Trumps defense was to that which was when he tried to sue her :

- 'Sure, the Jury only found i forcibly Finger fucked you E Jean, I grabbed by the pussy, but they were unsure if i used my penis, so by NYS law they call that Sexual Assault when in most of the country it rape either way. WIN FOR ME!'


Note, Trump NEVER denied it in his attempted lawsuit against E Jean, he simply argued that she could not say 'rape' and could only say 'sexual assault'.

The Judge in that case made a Finding of FACT that the jury finding is consistent with 'rape' regardless of the NYS distinction, as that is how the word is used in most of the rest of the country.


That is why Trump never filed any more appeals. As he started with a Jury verdict he 'Sexual Assaulted' her.
In his attempt to sue her he GAINED a judge Factual Finding 'In fact he RAPED her'.

His next step would have seen the Appeals Court say 'You raped her' , in their Factual Findings.

A SC Appeal would have seen them say 'You raped her'.

So Trump realize the more he appealed the worse it got for him in terms of denials.
 
Back
Top