DUH~~~Dennis Blair

We're stupider than shit.

__________________
Projected annual budget deficit of well over $1 trillion.

The most powerful person in the United States, at least in economic terms, is the Federal bureaucrat who signs my welfare check

I brought the cock to my lips with greed
Begging for sex, my dirty need
man took off running, I'm ugly indeed
They never return, shit, of this I take no heed.

Kumar......
 
Unbelievable! Obama's National Security Team hard at work!

YouTube- DNI Dennis Blair: We Didn't Use The HIG, "DUH!"

See more video here.

I checked the link. In it there is another link stating the HIG is not operational yet. Anyway, assuming it is operational or does become operational how is it supposed to operate?

For example, if a person is apprehended the interrogation would be started immediately. Who decides if the person is a terrorist or just a crackpot? If one is designated a terrorist and it's later concluded they were just a crackpot (suicidal, anarchist) that will mean the person's rights were grossly violated. Have not cases been thrown out due to one not being read their Miranda Rights?

Furthermore, would the case against a run-of-the-mill crackpot be thrown out of court even if they had tried to bring down a plane? If memory serves correctly something happened not long ago where a passenger tried to open the door on a plane and was subdued. In that case the person was hospitalized and, so far, not considered a terrorist.

So, my point is what will happen if "Joe" is considered a terrorist and later found out not to be a terrorist? Will the authorities have to choose between lying and maintaining Joe is a terrorist, knowing if they go to criminal court his case will be thrown out due to his rights having been grossly violated, or let Joe walk free?

Does anyone see any potential problem here?
 
I checked the link. In it there is another link stating the HIG is not operational yet. Anyway, assuming it is operational or does become operational how is it supposed to operate?

For example, if a person is apprehended the interrogation would be started immediately. Who decides if the person is a terrorist or just a crackpot? If one is designated a terrorist and it's later concluded they were just a crackpot (suicidal, anarchist) that will mean the person's rights were grossly violated. Have not cases been thrown out due to one not being read their Miranda Rights?

Furthermore, would the case against a run-of-the-mill crackpot be thrown out of court even if they had tried to bring down a plane? If memory serves correctly something happened not long ago where a passenger tried to open the door on a plane and was subdued. In that case the person was hospitalized and, so far, not considered a terrorist.

So, my point is what will happen if "Joe" is considered a terrorist and later found out not to be a terrorist? Will the authorities have to choose between lying and maintaining Joe is a terrorist, knowing if they go to criminal court his case will be thrown out due to his rights having been grossly violated, or let Joe walk free?

Does anyone see any potential problem here?

How dare you confuse the issue with facts?

_______________
"Civility"

Zappasguitar:
"shut the fuck up"
"you fucking fascist"
"fucking loser."

Zappasguitar:
"How's ass cancer impacting your butt trade fatso?"
"asshole fat prick-zap"
"you crotch sniffing split"
"fuck you you shrill lying cunt"
"Stupid stinky tuna twat"
"I am always an asshole""

Zappasguitar:
"timmie is an ass fuck"
"discuss how much jizz you can suck down!"
"Chrispie opened her ass and spewed shit"
Reply With Quote​
 
I totally agree with my friend.

________________
Projected annual budget deficit of well over $1 trillion.

The most powerful person in the United States, at least in economic terms, is the Federal bureaucrat who signs my welfare checks

I brought the cock to my lips with greed
Begging for sex, my dirty need
the man ran away, I'm ugly indeed
they never return, shit, of this I take no heed.

Kumar.....
.
 
Back
Top