Sham impeachment

Cypress

Well-known member
Republican Congressman: Colleagues were warned informant’s Biden claims were not verified

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) on Wednesday criticized his Republican colleagues for using a former FBI informant’s claims in their impeachment inquiry even though the statements hadn’t been verified.

“We were warned at the time that we received the document outlining this witness’s testimony. … We were warned that the credibility of this statement was not known,” Buck said.

"And yet, people, my colleagues went out and talk to the public about how this was credible and how it was damning and how it proved President Biden’s — at the time Vice President Biden’s — complicity in receiving bribes,” he added.

The informant, Alexander Smirnov, was arrested and charged last week with making false statements to the FBI. He had previously told the FBI that President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, received $5 million bribes from the head of Ukrainian energy firm Burisma.

House Republicans have previously put that claim at the front and center of their investigations into the Bidens. Buck said it is evident now that the information Smirnov relayed was false.

“It appears to absolutely be false, and to really undercut the nature of the charges. We’ve always been looking for a link between what Hunter Biden received in terms of money and Joe Biden’s activities or Joe Biden receiving money,” Buck explained. “This clearly is not a credible link at this point.”

On Wednesday, CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins then asked the Colorado Republican if House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) and House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) used the information “to fuel these investigations, regardless” of them knowing the information was not corroborated.

“That’s what it appears,” Buck responded. “I certainly didn’t have any evidence outside the statement itself that it was credible. And as a prosecutor for 25 years, Kaitlan, I never went to the public until I could prove the reliability of a statement
 
The real story here is that MAGA congressmen colluded with a Kremlin asset to affect an American election.
 
Full speed ahead after Brother Biden's questioning...

The witnesses that were hostile to Biden have all failed to find anything real against Biden, so you are putting your faith in the witnesses that love Biden presenting evidence against him?

That is called desperation.
 
There is only one reason why there is even an inquiry: Trump's vindictiveness (which is epic in scale).

Actually, there is one side reason: the current Republican Party is populated by spineless, whimpering cowards.
 
Russian collusion is being proven in more and more cases.

Would that go back to the two sham Russian Collusion hoax impeachments against Trump? Were those so-called collusions two of the cases
you say are more and more being proven? LOL!
 
Republican Congressman: Colleagues were warned informant’s Biden claims were not verified

Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) on Wednesday criticized his Republican colleagues for using a former FBI informant’s claims in their impeachment inquiry even though the statements hadn’t been verified.

“We were warned at the time that we received the document outlining this witness’s testimony. … We were warned that the credibility of this statement was not known,” Buck said.

"And yet, people, my colleagues went out and talk to the public about how this was credible and how it was damning and how it proved President Biden’s — at the time Vice President Biden’s — complicity in receiving bribes,” he added.

The informant, Alexander Smirnov, was arrested and charged last week with making false statements to the FBI. He had previously told the FBI that President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, received $5 million bribes from the head of Ukrainian energy firm Burisma.

House Republicans have previously put that claim at the front and center of their investigations into the Bidens. Buck said it is evident now that the information Smirnov relayed was false.

“It appears to absolutely be false, and to really undercut the nature of the charges. We’ve always been looking for a link between what Hunter Biden received in terms of money and Joe Biden’s activities or Joe Biden receiving money,” Buck explained. “This clearly is not a credible link at this point.”

On Wednesday, CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins then asked the Colorado Republican if House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) and House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) used the information “to fuel these investigations, regardless” of them knowing the information was not corroborated.

“That’s what it appears,” Buck responded. “I certainly didn’t have any evidence outside the statement itself that it was credible. And as a prosecutor for 25 years, Kaitlan, I never went to the public until I could prove the reliability of a statement

Who gives a shit? You mongrels turned it into a game. Play on.
 
Who gives a shit? You mongrels turned it into a game. Play on.

The impeachment of Trump for inciting an insurrection was bipartisan, six Republican senators and a dozen Republican representatives voted for impeachment or removal.

The Biden impeachment inquiry is 100 percent hyperpartisan, and based largely on Kremlin misinformation.

As a self professed Christian, it's weird that you openly and enthusiastically support defamation and libel in pursuit of political games.
 
Back
Top