so much for not raiding med marijuana places

again you fucking moron... his job is to LEAD. Not to hold the hands of every agent on every decision they make. If an agent fucks up... THEN the superiors of that agent should act. IF the superiors do not ACT... THEN the buck stops with Obama you fucking ignorant hack.




You have already agreed that we don't know if this guy was licensed yet. So what exactly is there for Obama to repudiate at this time?




No dear little retard, I am not jizzing all over myself. I am trying to prevent you from doing so all over the board with your nonsense. I LIVE HERE. THIS BUST HAPPENED WITHIN TEN MILES OF WHERE I LIVE AND WORK. I KNOW THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND CITY.

So while I am not positive he didn't get a license, I would certainly be in a better position than YOU to make an educated guess on the matter.

LOOOOOL

translation:

i don't actually know anything, but because i am physically close to the location of where this went down, i'm more qualified to spout my opinion, but i really don't know anything more than you at this point, but I LIVE HERE!!!!

:lol:
 
i am not making an idiot out of myself, you're just showing your partisan slip again. the guys was clear that the mandate was to still bust people. until and only until obama repudiates that, then i can only believe that obama is saying one thing and actually doing another.....

and you have nothing to counter that, you first lamely tried to say this guy was rogue, then you quickly abandoned that, and now you want to hang your hat on the theory that this guy will get disciplined....yet you don't care what he said about their policy and how they will continue to investigate, thus utilize federal resources, to go after medical dispensaries in direct contrast to obama's campaing promises and his statements last february.

i have actions and this guys words that stand in direct contrast to what obama said. you have nothing.....

Nah - you're getting shellacked here.

First, how do you say Obama should resign if "he can't get his agents to obey him," and not hold that standard to other Presidents? Clear ODS.

The guy doesn't speak for Obama. As I have said, if he's in violation of the policy, I don't really doubt that he'll have to deal w/ the consequences. And you keep implying that he IS in violation, which is funny, because earlier, you said none of us have all of the facts.

And we don't; you're ignoring the fact that this guy was near a school, and likely had more plants than are allotted under local law, and dismissing the fact that he's talking more like a dealer than an hc provider when talking about profits.

You have ODS. Face it. It isn't pretty. Just look at your very first reaction on this thread.
 
LOOOOOL

translation:

i don't actually know anything, but because i am physically close to the location of where this went down, i'm more qualified to spout my opinion, but i really don't know anything more than you at this point, but I LIVE HERE!!!!

:lol:

You really are a fucking retard aren't you?

The only thing I do not know is whether or not this guy had a dispensary license. My familiarity with the location, the city and the news that has surrounded this issue for the past year here does indeed give me a greater insight into what is going on than some knee jerk reactionary like you who doesn't have a fucking clue as to what is going on in the state of CO.

Instead of actually waiting for more information, you run around like some moronic spaz having an attack because you think Obama should control the actions of every one of his DEA agents and that he should denounce them the second a potential controversy arises ... you know... like he stupidly did with the Gates situation?

I would hope he learned his lesson after that incident.
 
Yurt always slams Desh, but this is exactly the kind of logic Desh used against Bush.

He's the Desh of the right.
 
Yurt wins again!

Yurt is the smartest man on earth.

The rest of you should kill yourselves because you can't be like Yurt.
 
You are indeed correct on that point Yurt... you went sailing right on past 'idiot' a long time ago. You are in full retard mode at this time.

i understand you're reeling from your dumb statement that because you physically reside close by this makes you more knowledgeable....yet in the same breath you admitted you didn't know anymore than i did about the situation

so if this makes you feel better after that embarrassing post :clink:
 
No, not always. IF it comes out that this was an unlawful raid, or a raid that went against the policy that he DID implement (Mr. "say one thing & do another"), then I'd like to see him repudiate that or say something about it, yeah.

But the most important thing is that the agent gets discplinary action or whatever the law requires, if he acted against the policy. That's one of the ways you can gauge a policy's effectiveness.

You're really making an idiot of yourself at this point, btw...

:clink:


You're really big on showing that you think the DEA Agent should be held accountable, if he's wrong; but I have yet to see you say anything about what should happen to the grower, if it's found out that he wasn't cleared to do any of this.
 
You tell 'em, Yurt.

I bet they are contemplating suicide now that you've proven what fools they are.

You really should run for President!
 
Nah - you're getting shellacked here.

First, how do you say Obama should resign if "he can't get his agents to obey him," and not hold that standard to other Presidents? Clear ODS.

The guy doesn't speak for Obama. As I have said, if he's in violation of the policy, I don't really doubt that he'll have to deal w/ the consequences. And you keep implying that he IS in violation, which is funny, because earlier, you said none of us have all of the facts.

And we don't; you're ignoring the fact that this guy was near a school, and likely had more plants than are allotted under local law, and dismissing the fact that he's talking more like a dealer than an hc provider when talking about profits.

You have ODS. Face it. It isn't pretty. Just look at your very first reaction on this thread.

not at all....you and superfreak are blindly defending obama, you i expect it, but not him. this isn't just about the dea actions, it is about the POLICY he stated. this is what you keep missing and instead you keep focusing on this one incident. i've repeatedly said this is about more than this one event, but you of course dishonestly keep harping on this one event.

i already said my statement was obvious hyperbole, that you can't see it shows me you have no desire to honestly discuss this, rather, you just want to attack dear ol' yurt.

i'm not ignoring that he was by a school, that is a lie. the fact is, it didn't make a fucking bit of difference, they raided the guy the next day because he was stupid enough to go on TV and basically give a finger to overzealous dea agent in CO....i highly doubt the school part was an issue and as it stands you, SF have not linked to the fact that he was within 1000 feet of the school....

apparently i have to repeat myself because you're frothing at the mouth over this issue.....i don't care if this guy is in violation of the state law, thus deserving of the arrest..........i care about the agents words as they clearly indicate policy

so, until obama repudiates the policy as stated by the dea agent, we have nothing else to go on except what this dea agent stated is their policy and thouughts on the issue. so you can whine all day, but until obama says this agent is wrong, then that is the policy....if an employee goes on national tv and says something about policy and the employer doesn't refute it, are you actually telling me that you believe this doesn't at all reflect on the employer?

please tell me you're not that stupid
 
not at all....you and superfreak are blindly defending obama, you i expect it, but not him. this isn't just about the dea actions, it is about the POLICY he stated. this is what you keep missing and instead you keep focusing on this one incident. i've repeatedly said this is about more than this one event, but you of course dishonestly keep harping on this one event.

i already said my statement was obvious hyperbole, that you can't see it shows me you have no desire to honestly discuss this, rather, you just want to attack dear ol' yurt.

i'm not ignoring that he was by a school, that is a lie. the fact is, it didn't make a fucking bit of difference, they raided the guy the next day because he was stupid enough to go on TV and basically give a finger to overzealous dea agent in CO....i highly doubt the school part was an issue and as it stands you, SF have not linked to the fact that he was within 1000 feet of the school....

apparently i have to repeat myself because you're frothing at the mouth over this issue.....i don't care if this guy is in violation of the state law, thus deserving of the arrest..........i care about the agents words as they clearly indicate policy

so, until obama repudiates the policy as stated by the dea agent, we have nothing else to go on except what this dea agent stated is their policy and thouughts on the issue. so you can whine all day, but until obama says this agent is wrong, then that is the policy....if an employee goes on national tv and says something about policy and the employer doesn't refute it, are you actually telling me that you believe this doesn't at all reflect on the employer?

please tell me you're not that stupid

:rofl:

Translation: I know I have ODS. How can I get help?
 
:rofl:

Translation: I know I have ODS. How can I get help?

why am i not surprised you can't intelligently discuss the issue, i put my points and questions out, clearly and succinctly, and obviously its above your intellectual comprehension

thanks for showing us all the true hack you are, unfortunately, no one is surprised
 
why am i not surprised you can't intelligently discuss the issue, i put my points and questions out, clearly and succinctly, and obviously its above your intellectual comprehension

thanks for showing us all the true hack you are, unfortunately, no one is surprised

pot/kettle

Look back over this thread, CBO. I mean, the hypocrisy of your above statement is truly somethin'.

:good4u:

Your over-reaction when it comes to anything Obama is - once again - well-documented...
 
pot/kettle

Look back over this thread, CBO. I mean, the hypocrisy of your above statement is truly somethin'.

:good4u:

Your over-reaction when it comes to anything Obama is - once again - well-documented...

:rolleyes:

too much for you to handle huh....had to go back and obsess about the CBO thread....i guess i could go back and obsess how you lied when you claimed you answered all my questions in another thread....seems the only way to get you to debate, give you your shit right back in your face, else you just continue to act like a hack

back to the TOPIC of this THIS thread....before onceler derails yet ANOTHER thread about the CBO issue which i answered and linked to, he just doesn't like the answer so he runs around lying about the thread....

obsessive freak
 
:rolleyes:

too much for you to handle huh....had to go back and obsess about the CBO thread....i guess i could go back and obsess how you lied when you claimed you answered all my questions in another thread....seems the only way to get you to debate, give you your shit right back in your face, else you just continue to act like a hack

back to the TOPIC of this THIS thread....before onceler derails yet ANOTHER thread about the CBO issue which i answered and linked to, he just doesn't like the answer so he runs around lying about the thread....

obsessive freak

I'm not going back to the CBO thread. I'm calling you "CBO".

It's a nickname - like Bush used to give people.

And don't go talking about me derailing a thread; you derailed it once you let your ODS to the surface w/ the 1st response, and every subsequent defense that you provided for the hate...
 
I'm not going back to the CBO thread. I'm calling you "CBO".

It's a nickname - like Bush used to give people.

And don't go talking about me derailing a thread; you derailed it once you let your ODS to the surface w/ the 1st response, and every subsequent defense that you provided for the hate...

That would mean that you are afflicted with SUB.
 
I'm not going back to the CBO thread. I'm calling you "CBO".

It's a nickname - like Bush used to give people.

And don't go talking about me derailing a thread; you derailed it once you let your ODS to the surface w/ the 1st response, and every subsequent defense that you provided for the hate...

more onceler lies...., you're trying to derail the thread by bringing up the cbo thread, i guess i should call you a liar or failanswerguy FAG in every thread because you lied when you claimed you answered all my questions the other day :rolleyes: what are you five years old? infantile moron.

there is no hate, only your inability to deal with facts rationally....if someone speaks out against obama, they hate him. your irrational defense of obama borders on insane infatuation with him. you can't answer my questions about the dea agent spouting policy, you don't even know if the guy broke state law, you ignore the other raids and all you do is froth at the mouth that i hate obama.

simply not true, you just can't debate the issues, so you troll out your usual bullshit
 
Back
Top