Joe Lieberman Does Something Worthwhile

B

Bonestorm

Thrillhouse
Joe is good for something:

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) announced this morning that he will introduce legislation repealing "Don't ask, don't tell."

Democrats have sought to repeal the law since President Barack Obama took office, but have been stymied by a busy legislative calendar.

Lieberman says the time is now right to pass a repeal.

"I will be proud to be a sponsor of the important effort to enable patriotic gay Americans to defend our national security and our founding values of freedom and opportunity," Lieberman said. "To exclude one group of Americans from serving in the armed forces is contrary to our fundamental principles as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and weakens our defenses by denying our military the service of a large group of Americans who can help our cause."
Click to expand...


I fully expect Lieberman to find out that liberals strongly support the repeal of DADT at which point Lieberman with withdraw his sponsorship just to piss of the hippies.


http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...man-to-introduce-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell
 
Under current law queers can "defend our national security and our founding values of freedom and opportunity". They just have to keep it in their pants or be discrete as every other members of the armed services is expected to do. *shrug*
 
Southern Man said:
Under current law queers can "defend our national security and our founding values of freedom and opportunity". They just have to keep it in their pants or be discrete as every other members of the armed services is expected to do. *shrug*
Click to expand...

Are you saying homosexuals will be unable to keep their genitals in their pants if DADT is repealed?

Are you seriously implying DADT is the only reason homosexuals are "keeping it in their pants"?
 
Southern Man said:
Under current law queers can "defend our national security and our founding values of freedom and opportunity". They just have to keep it in their pants or be discrete as every other members of the armed services is expected to do. *shrug*
Click to expand...


Yeah, it amazes me that heterosexual members of the armed services have to hide who they are married to, who they are dating, who they are banging and the like.
 
Southern Man said:
Under current law queers can "defend our national security and our founding values of freedom and opportunity". They just have to keep it in their pants or be discrete as every other members of the armed services is expected to do. *shrug*
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
It appears that you read more into my post than was plainly stated. That's your fuck-up, not mine.
Click to expand...

You were the person who implied the correlation between current law and homosexuals ability to keep it in their pants.

Explain what you think will happen if DADT is repealed.
 
NigelTufnel said:
Yeah, it amazes me that heterosexual members of the armed services have to hide who they are married to, who they are dating, who they are banging and the like.
Click to expand...
As long as they don't advertise a relationship based on sodomy they don't have to hide anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top