Maybe we need a new Constitutional Convention.

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Is it possable our constitution is too old and uninterpertable....

Maybe we need a new CC and use the current constitution as a rough draft to form a new and updated one!!!

Lets start with the Bill of Rights...

What would you change or clarify?
 
It's interpretable jarod, nazis like you just don't like what it says.

I like what it says, for the most part...

But there is so much of what I consider "misinterperation" I wonder if it would be better if we had some upadated language....

As language changes so do the meaning of words....
 
I like what it says, for the most part...

But there is so much of what I consider "misinterperation" I wonder if it would be better if we had some upadated language....

As language changes so do the meaning of words....

But the intent does not change.

What's the biggest misinterpretation in your opinion?
 
I'd stop at 'congress shall make no law'.
We just need an Amendment stating that each new law must be justified under the enumerated powers. And that old laws will be re-evaluated within ten years, and if found not to be within the enumerated powers, will become void within another ten years.
 
But the intent does not change.

What's the biggest misinterpretation in your opinion?

It becomes harder and harder to devine the intent as time passes. Plenty of whackos still belive Christanity is the official religen of our nation for example. To me it is clear that there is no state religen.
 
I like what it says, for the most part...

But there is so much of what I consider "misinterperation" I wonder if it would be better if we had some upadated language....

As language changes so do the meaning of words....

the meanings only change in the constitution if the nazis want it to. 'shall not be infringed' should still mean 'shall not be infringed', instead of 'reasonable regulation'.
 
It becomes harder and harder to devine the intent as time passes. Plenty of whackos still belive Christanity is the official religen of our nation for example. To me it is clear that there is no state religen.

No it fucking doesn't. You just hate individual rights.
 
Law schools are churning out idiots if judges can't understand the difference between 'Shall be infringed' and 'shall not be infringed'. It's not confusing. It's not vague. It's not outdated, it's just not the totalitarianism elitists love so much.
 
Its assholes like you two who belive that "shall not be infringed" is absolute, yet "shall make no law.." is flexable.
 
Law schools are churning out idiots if judges can't understand the difference between 'Shall be infringed' and 'shall not be infringed'. It's not confusing. It's not vague. It's not outdated, it's just not the totalitarianism elitists love so much.
Holy shit you're on a roll today. Just don't bring up that noahide shit and you'll be OK.
 
Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
 
Back
Top