Maybe we need a new Constitutional Convention.

So its okay for Congress to pass a law respecting the establishment of religen, yet they cant regulate the ownership of AK-47's?
 
Law schools are churning out idiots if judges can't understand the difference between 'Shall be infringed' and 'shall not be infringed'. It's not confusing. It's not vague. It's not outdated, it's just not the totalitarianism elitists love so much.

so anyone should be allowed to own a nuclear ICBM?
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

So should a permit be required to have a rally or to protest naked?
Should the media be allowed to publish military secrets?
Should a federal courthouse be allowed to display the 10 comandments?
 
Back
Top