Maybe we need a new Constitutional Convention.

SmarterThanYou said:
since I don't see any company marketing plutonium or uranium, much less the highly and accurately machined parts, then manufacturing the weapon for the open market, I think we're pretty safe. but in the statist freedom hating world, anything is possible.
Click to expand...

So, constitutionally speaking, it matters if a company markets the product or not?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
since I don't see any company marketing plutonium or uranium, much less the highly and accurately machined parts, then manufacturing the weapon for the open market, I think we're pretty safe. but in the statist freedom hating world, anything is possible.
Click to expand...

doesn't matter....do you believe the government should not infringe upon the right to carry small nuclear arms that a soldier can carry, such as a suitcase nuke
 
Seriously, just for the sake of determining what you belive about the Constitution, not the availability of suitcase nukes...

Would it be constitutionally protected if I had one...?
 
Yurt said:
doesn't matter....do you believe the government should not infringe upon the right to carry small nuclear arms that a soldier can carry, such as a suitcase nuke
Click to expand...

k, since we want to continue pushing for this strawman. yes. you should be able to keep and bear nukes.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
since I don't see any company marketing plutonium or uranium, much less the highly and accurately machined parts, then manufacturing the weapon for the open market, I think we're pretty safe. but in the statist freedom hating world, anything is possible.
Click to expand...
What a foolish argument.
 
Yurt said:
doesn't matter....do you believe the government should not infringe upon the right to carry small nuclear arms that a soldier can carry, such as a suitcase nuke
Click to expand...

Exactly. Maybe those statists will learn some respect for the common man.
 
We just need reasonableness to prevail...

We need reasonable restrictions on these "absolute" rights. The world is a dfferent place than it was in 1776.

Suitcase nukes were not a concern then.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
k, since we want to continue pushing for this strawman. yes. you should be able to keep and bear nukes.
Click to expand...

it is not a strawman, i never claimed anyone argued this. it is a logical conclusion and threshhold upon with which we can fully discuss which arms you believe the government should not infringe upon your right to carry...

i think it makes a mockery of the 2nd amendmnet to claim that suitcase nukes deserve 2nd amendment protection....such weapons of mass destruction were not contemplated by the founders and you know it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top