evince
Truthmatters

We are in a second Gilded Age, some experts say
As economic inequality and wealth concentration rise, the U.S. is entering a new era of support for workers' rights, reminiscent of the Gilded Age.
You're right like claiming hunters laptop was Russian "disinformation". You people are lying colostomy bags.I know the right hates history
But history matters
Hunter never ran for office idiotYou're right like claiming hunters laptop was Russian "disinformation". You people are lying colostomy bags.
What do you think of Paretos ideas about income inequalityYou're right like claiming hunters laptop was Russian "disinformation". You people are lying colostomy bags.
Then why did you filthy maggots like about it and call it Russian "disinformation"?Hunter never ran for office idiot
He has nothing to do with the guilted age either
Tell us what you know about that moment in American history
Wrong threadThen why did you filthy maggots like about it and call it Russian "disinformation"?
In United States history, the Gilded Age is described as the period from about the late 1870s to the late 1890s, which occurred between the Reconstruction Era and the Progressive Era. It was named by 1920s historians after an 1873 Mark Twain novel. Historians saw late 19th-century economic expansion as a time of materialistic excesses marked by widespread political corruption.
![]()
We are in a second Gilded Age, some experts say
As economic inequality and wealth concentration rise, the U.S. is entering a new era of support for workers' rights, reminiscent of the Gilded Age.abcnews.go.com
It's irrelevant. There always has been and always will be income "inequality". Income should be based on what skills a person possesses and their relevant value and/or what they are able to produce. Saying income inequality is "unfair" is a third grade level argument.What do you think of Paretos ideas about income inequality
You're right like claiming hunters laptop was Russian "disinformation". You people are lying colostomy bags.
You are the only one who says it’s meaninglessIt's irrelevant. There always has been and always will be income "inequality". Income should be based on what skills a person possesses and their relevant value and/or what they are able to produce. Saying income inequality is "unfair" is a third grade level argument.
You should avoid itWrong thread
Have the decency to answer the question they was presented before you whined about wanting your own answered. You people are filthy ignorant pigsSpeaking of Hunter. Can you explain why when TRUMP was convicted in a court of law it was a sign that Biden was pulling the strings in the DOJ to have his way, but when Hunter was convicted suddenly you didn't have any theories.
Do you think that makes sense?
If you do you might want to go back and revisit logic.