Yes! If you aren't answering mine, I'm not answering yours. That's how it works.Nope. It doesn't even show a fraction of all the questions you have EVADED ... which is all of them.
It's just that I answered all of your questions, directly and correctly. But when I asked you a question, you panicked and then rushed to quickly sneak in a totally irrelevant question that could only be answered by derailing the topic. Then you insisted that you wouldn't answer mine until the entire topic was derailed.Yes! If you aren't answering mine, I'm not answering yours. That's how it works.
Keep crazy alive, trollboy.It's just that I answered all of your questions, directly and correctly. But when I asked you a question, you panicked and then rushed to quickly sneak in a totally irrelevant question that could only be answered by derailing the topic. Then you insisted that you wouldn't answer mine until the entire topic was derailed.
So, no big deal. You won't answer my question because that's your way of tipping your king.
Keep dishonesty alive, warmizombie.Keep crazy alive, trollboy.
The funny thing is, you are so caught up in your far right, conspiracy theorizing scientific dishonesty that you fail to realize that I've never said that I definitely believe climate change, caused by man, is real.Keep dishonesty alive, warmizombie.
Yet another "I never said ..." without making any attempt to assert "This is what I'm stating ..."The funny thing is, you are so caught up in your [gibberish removed] that you fail to realize that I've never said that I definitely believe climate change, caused by man, is real.
Yet another "I never said ..." without making any attempt to assert "This is what I'm stating ..."
That was a pivot, and an erroneous one. We were focused specifically within the context of Earth's average global equilibrium temperature (singular) and had begun discussing why you believe in Global Warming. In order to weasel out of revealing that your faith is merely an irrational religious belief based on physics violations, you did the following:Rather than spending my time trying to get people to the point I'm trying to make, I figure it would be easier just to get to the point.
There are only a few things that any one person has to believe are possible to believe that man-made climate change is possible. Not saying it's definitely true, just possible.
- Energy from the Sun increases temperature on Earth. When energy (generally referred to as "heat" in everyday conversation) leaves the Earth, the temperature decrease.
- The Earth's atmosphere impacts energy coming from the Sun and energy leaving the...
Your dishonesty aside, my position is clearly stated at the link provided.That was a pivot, and an erroneous one. We were focused specifically within the context of Earth's average global equilibrium temperature (singular) and had begun discussing why you believe in Global Warming. In order to weasel out of revealing that your faith is merely an irrational religious belief based on physics violations, you did the following:
1. you first tried to explain that greenhouse effect increases Earth's average global equilibrium temperature by merely redistributing atmospheric thermal energy which, by definition, doesn't alter Earth's average global equilibrium temperature.
2. then, for about the eighth time, you returned to treating the atmosphere as though it wasn't part of the earth, and insisted that infrared leaving the lithosphere that is absorbed by the atmosphere somehow "leaves the earth."
3. then you refrained from admitting that Earth's average global equilibrium temperature never actually changes by creating an irrelevant point about highs and lows of an atmosphere ... that amount to Earth's average global equilibrium temperature never actually changing. You then insisted that you wouldn't answer any questions that reveal that Earth's average global equilibrium temperature never actually changes until I derailed the conversation and answered your question that concludes that Earth's average global equilibrium temperature never actually changes.
-3a. In all of this you managed to deny repeatedly the daytime side of the moon's hotter temperatures than Earth's daytime side.
4. you then began playing word games about qualifying what you never said you totally believed ... or something like that.
The fact is that you firmly believe in all of the physics violations of Global Warming, Climate Change and the greenhouse effect doctrine, and you pretend those who simply don't worship as you do are scientifically illiterate as you are.
Yeah, Santa Claus, the Loch Ness monster, the Chupacabra and my my dishonesty aside ...Your dishonesty aside,
Too funny! I don't see any link provided.my position is clearly stated at the link provided.
It must be because I'm not tap dancing. I ripped your argument apart. It was trivial to do since you couldn't get anything right.I'm not chasing you around while you continue to tap dance.
Indeed.Still Howard is just ranked #86 and is nowhere near an Ivy league school. There are a couple better schools in almost every state. Students tend to like Howard because it is a party school. I have worked with people that went to Howard and they were not superstars. But in all fairness I have also worked with people from Harvard that were not superstars too.
I had a neighbor kid who is black. I liked him a lot and made him a rudimentary go-kart using an edger engine his dad was discarding (wooden frame and lawn mower wheels and an engine.) . He was a good kid. He flunked out of Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington.(Rank #88 in Engineering) So he went to Prairie View A&M a HBCU for engineering (ranked 370th in Engineering). He did well there and is a Engineer today. I'm happy for him. He told me his very rudimentary go-kart helped inspire him to become an engineer.All colleges are not equal.
Just out of curiosity, do you think this is a winning thread for you?