Harris’ campaign leaders say there was a ‘price to be paid’ for shortened campaign against Trump

H

Hume

Verified User
NEW YORK (AP) — The leaders of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign insist they simply didn’t have enough time to execute a winning strategy against Donald Trump, pointing to “ferocious” political headwinds that were ultimately too much to overcome in the 107-day period after President Joe Biden stepped aside.

apnews.com

Harris' campaign leaders say there was a 'price to be paid' for shortened campaign against Trump

The leaders of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign say they simply didn’t have enough time to execute a winning strategy against Donald Trump.
apnews.com apnews.com

What a bunch of whining pussies.
 
Hume said:
NEW YORK (AP) — The leaders of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign insist they simply didn’t have enough time to execute a winning strategy against Donald Trump, pointing to “ferocious” political headwinds that were ultimately too much to overcome in the 107-day period after President Joe Biden stepped aside.

apnews.com

Harris' campaign leaders say there was a 'price to be paid' for shortened campaign against Trump

The leaders of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign say they simply didn’t have enough time to execute a winning strategy against Donald Trump.
apnews.com apnews.com

What a bunch of whining pussies.
Click to expand...
They are correct, actually, she accomplished quite a bit in just the 100 days she had, with more time she may have been able to turn out the Democrats who didn’t show up, but it is all water under the bridge now
 
archives said:
They are correct, actually, she accomplished quite a bit in just the 100 days she had, with more time she may have been able to turn out the Democrats who didn’t show up, but it is all water under the bridge now
Click to expand...

Aren't they still counting ballots?
 
It rather looks today what happened was that the people who run elections expected a very close election so minimal cheating was required, but the pollsters were nowhere near right yet again. The election folks were not prepared to do what was required to declare Harris the winner.

Normally it takes till Jan/Feb for the experts to go over the evidence and report back with confidence, so this evaluation might change.
 
archives said:
Getting to believe these two are the same, both pseudonymous of “copy and paste”

Regardless , she had 100 days to organize a staff, fund raiser, and campaign, events that takes others years. given the task, she did what she could
Click to expand...
you're a fucking asshole
 
One view from academia:

"The issue where the academy is most out of step with the electorate writ large is, as the author notes, in its dogmatic commitment to "diversity" and racial preferences. This, by itself, is going to lead to a conflagration and perhaps disaster--since there's no denying that Trump has the tools to create real problems for higher education, and may finish it off as the world leader.

 
"A Marist poll this year revealed that 57 percent of Latinos surveyed are in favor of deporting all illegal immigrants. A Pew poll showed that 75 percent of Black respondents and 85 percent of Latinos are in favor of voter ID laws. After the Supreme Court banned affirmative action in college admissions, Gallup found that 52 percent of Black and 68 percent of Latino adults supported the decision. Another Pew poll, consistent with earlier findings, showed that only 4 percent of Latinos use “Latinx,” and that of those who have heard of the term, the vast majority reject it. And then there are perhaps the most important data points of all. Donald Trump increased his support among Black, Latino, and Asian voters from 2016 to 2020, then increased it again from 2020 to 2024 (he also got a majority of the Native American vote). The light was blinking. Now it’s solid red."

 
Hume said:
"A Marist poll this year revealed that 57 percent of Latinos surveyed are in favor of deporting all illegal immigrants. A Pew poll showed that 75 percent of Black respondents and 85 percent of Latinos are in favor of voter ID laws. After the Supreme Court banned affirmative action in college admissions, Gallup found that 52 percent of Black and 68 percent of Latino adults supported the decision. Another Pew poll, consistent with earlier findings, showed that only 4 percent of Latinos use “Latinx,” and that of those who have heard of the term, the vast majority reject it. And then there are perhaps the most important data points of all. Donald Trump increased his support among Black, Latino, and Asian voters from 2016 to 2020, then increased it again from 2020 to 2024 (he also got a majority of the Native American vote). The light was blinking. Now it’s solid red."

Click to expand...
Fear works. Trump is a simple man with simple ideas that worked on people who cannot grasp the big picture.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top