Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage

volsrocks said:
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage.


rumble.com

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage.
rumble.com rumble.com


My God
Click to expand...
g6hlr.jpg
 
And now this gem

Sotomayor: “Every medical treatment has risk. Even taking Aspirin—

Comparing child mutilation to taking an aspirin is mind numbingly stupid.


I guess this stupid bitch thinks driving a car 35 mph in a 35 zone.. carries the same risk as driving 135 mph in a 35 zone

Or having bariatric surgery vs taking a fat burning pill
 
Last edited:
If white adoptive parents were to decide to bleach, permanently, the skin of their black adoptive child. I wonder how the bitch would rule in that case.
 
Affirmative Action Jackson's (who's not a biologist) DEI colleague the "wise Latina" also said "Every medical treatment has risk. Even taking aspirin."

:rofl2:
 
volsrocks said:
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage.


rumble.com

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage.
rumble.com rumble.com


My God
Click to expand...

Did you actually listen to the recording?

This is where you MAGA folks' lack of education is showing. Ms. Brown is critiquing the STRUCTURE of the law as it is written. I don't believe she is saying that sex changes for kids is the same as miscegination. She is apparently make a more subtle point as to how the law will be applied and how it is structured in light of a previous case in which a law's structure was not dissimilar and fell for specific reasons.

This is why MAGA folks should never listen to SCOTUS proceedings. They are debating things in ways you wouldn't understand. Sometimes they may even use examples you find controversial but it is likely that you don't really understand what the point was.

Don't worry trying to rebut this. It is a truth generally accepted that folks like you who have significant educational limitations are not going to be able to understand how those limitations limit you. This is Dunning-Kruger writ large.
 
Lionfish said:
More meaningful than hiring a moron just because of sex and color.
Click to expand...
No, it really isn't. It's a completely random number.

The best test of hiring anyone is whether they can do the job required of them and whether they have the attitude to expand beyond that initial role.
I really don't care what color skin they have. Affirmative action is institutionalized racism. Fuck it.

If someone is willing to mutilate themselves, they won't work at my company. There is no place there for anyone so screwed up psychologically.
 
Last edited:
Daylight63 said:
Did you actually listen to the recording?

This is where you MAGA folks' lack of education is showing. Ms. Brown is critiquing the STRUCTURE of the law as it is written. I don't believe she is saying that sex changes for kids is the same as miscegination. She is apparently make a more subtle point as to how the law will be applied and how it is structured in light of a previous case in which a law's structure was not dissimilar and fell for specific reasons.

This is why MAGA folks should never listen to SCOTUS proceedings. They are debating things in ways you wouldn't understand. Sometimes they may even use examples you find controversial but it is likely that you don't really understand what the point was.

Don't worry trying to rebut this. It is a truth generally accepted that folks like you who have significant educational limitations are not going to be able to understand how those limitations limit you. This is Dunning-Kruger writ large.
Click to expand...
Complexity fallacy. Mantra 1d. Lame.
 
Into the Night said:
No, it really isn't. It's a completely random number.

The best test of hiring anyone is whether they can do the job required of them and whether they have the attitude to expand beyond that initial role.
Click to expand...
I would choose a random number over a hiree based solely on race and sex,
 
volsrocks said:
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage.


rumble.com

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson compares bans on sex changes for kids to bans on interracial marriage.
rumble.com rumble.com


My God
Click to expand...
This is the same nitwit that can't tell us what a woman is but she thinks she can speak intelligently about this? Leftists are deluded arent they?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top