Fire Nancy Pelosi!

So 22 previous meetings were the vetting process...capice?
Click to expand...

Dixie said:
You mean, after Van Jones, they started actually "vetting" people? Wow... 22 meetings? That seems a bit much for a sub-cabinet-level position, doesn't it?
Click to expand...

No stupid, I'm not talking about Van Jones...that's another failed neocon attempt to derail Obama's campaign for another discussion.

Bottom line: your dumb ass didn't even know of Stern's appointment until I clued you in. Now your embarassed, so you throw out this lame ass McCarthy-istic insinuation about the number of meetings. Gee, I didn't know there were a set number of prior meetings between Presidential appointees on any level. :palm:

Back to the minors with you, Dixie....you're making a spectacle of yourself! :palm:
 
I want Cheney to cough up those secret energy policy meeting names and tell us just how secret documents got into Libby's hands in the first place. Fair is fair!
Click to expand...

Dixie said:
Sure thing! As soon as we get the 460,000 Freedom of Information Act requests granted, from this "Most Transparent" administration, we'll be glad to cooperate in fairness!
Click to expand...

Maybe you should clue in those dopey ass neocons that the vast majority of the information they wanted had been posted on gov't websites over the past year! :palm:

But hey, treason is okay for you so long as it benefits your ideology, right bunky?

Get your head out of Rove's ass and grow up, boy. Your side lost....AGAIN! Deal with it!
 
Originally Posted by Dixie
Sure thing! As soon as we get the 460,000 Freedom of Information Act requests granted, from this "Most Transparent" administration, we'll be glad to cooperate in fairness!
Click to expand...

christiefan915 said:
Sorry, no dice. After we get the sealed records from the reagan & bush 41 administrations, and the 5-plus million missing emails from the last, most secretive administration in history, then we'll talk.
Click to expand...

Touche'! And let's not forget those 200 missing pages from the 9/11 Commission Report!
 
christiefan915 said:
Sorry, no dice. After we get the sealed records from the reagan & bush 41 administrations, and the 5-plus million missing emails from the last, most secretive administration in history, then we'll talk.
Click to expand...

Well I tell ya what... why don't you libtards write and call your congresspersons and tell them this is what you want! Demand that Congress begin probing and investigating the Reagan and Bush administrations! Let's uncover ALL the secrets, now that you people hold the gavel! I think that is a marvelous idea, and I am looking forward to that agenda over the next several months! No, really... I would much rather Nancy and Harry be occupying their time investigating Cheney and Bush, than passing more socialist legislation.

...And who knows? You might be able to actually turn over a rock without finding a democrat under it for a change!
 
Taichiliberal said:
No stupid, I'm not talking about Van Jones...that's another failed neocon attempt to derail Obama's campaign for another discussion.

Bottom line: your dumb ass didn't even know of Stern's appointment until I clued you in. Now your embarassed, so you throw out this lame ass McCarthy-istic insinuation about the number of meetings. Gee, I didn't know there were a set number of prior meetings between Presidential appointees on any level. :palm:

Back to the minors with you, Dixie....you're making a spectacle of yourself! :palm:
Click to expand...

I don't really keep up with what Marxists Obama is appointing where, I don't figure it matters what I know in that regard, I already know they are Marxist, that tells me all I really need to know.

I think you are a cheap suit hack to claim 22 meetings with the president is "vetting" for a relatively minor appointment in the administration, but it doesn't surprise me the dude got a gig... he sure spends enough time talking to Obama about something! What does the Service Employees International Union do? Why would the leader of that Union need to meet with President Obama 22 times? Why can't we know what those meetings were about? Obama promised to run an open and transparent administration... pledged to run the MOST open and transparent... but they have denied 460,000 FOI requests since January '09. Doesn't sound like transparency to me... sounds as transparent as duct tape.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
No stupid, I'm not talking about Van Jones...that's another failed neocon attempt to derail Obama's campaign for another discussion.

Bottom line: your dumb ass didn't even know of Stern's appointment until I clued you in. Now your embarassed, so you throw out this lame ass McCarthy-istic insinuation about the number of meetings. Gee, I didn't know there were a set number of prior meetings between Presidential appointees on any level.

Back to the minors with you, Dixie....you're making a spectacle of yourself!
Click to expand...

Dixie said:
I don't really keep up with what Marxists Obama is appointing where, I don't figure it matters what I know in that regard, I already know they are Marxist, that tells me all I really need to know.

I think you are a cheap suit hack to claim 22 meetings with the president is "vetting" for a relatively minor appointment in the administration, but it doesn't surprise me the dude got a gig... he sure spends enough time talking to Obama about something! What does the Service Employees International Union do? Why would the leader of that Union need to meet with President Obama 22 times? Why can't we know what those meetings were about? Obama promised to run an open and transparent administration... pledged to run the MOST open and transparent... but they have denied 460,000 FOI requests since January '09. Doesn't sound like transparency to me... sounds as transparent as duct tape.
Click to expand...

Maybe if you got your head out of Glen Becks ass and stop swallowing neocon myths that appease your beliefs, you'd actually KNOW what the hell is going on in the world via decent research. Seems you're a bastion of neocon talking points (aka lies and distortions).

Here stupid, READ and LEARN (and if you can't disprove the FACTS, don't give me some BS about the source).

Regarding Stern

http://mediamatters.org/research/201001070037

Regarding FOI denials

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201003170031
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Touche'! And let's not forget those 200 missing pages from the 9/11 Commission Report!
Click to expand...

Dixie said:
Have you checked Sandy Berger's pants? :cool:
Click to expand...

No stupid....the deletions were done courtesy of the Shrub & company....so much for an honest, objective review made accessible to the people.

Berger got nailed for doing the wrong thing....you won't here me defending his actions. And the information he tried to shuffle out got exposed....and all the neocons could get was Slick Willy lied about cheating on Hillary.

Big freaking diffeence from hiding information about who fucked up in protecting America from deadly terrorist, wouldn't you say?
 
Damocles said:
You take things too seriously sometimes and make yourself look like an idiot. It was a joke that you are too vapid to just laugh at.
Click to expand...

Calling me an idiot because I didn't get your joke...and I'm the one taking things too seriously? Get over yourself, butch.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Calling me an idiot because I didn't get your joke...and I'm the one taking things too seriously? Get over yourself, butch.
Click to expand...

Looking like an idiot has been a life calling for you Vinny. Damo is just calling it like everyone else sees it.

You've got your ego so far up your own fanny the only thing you smell is the fetid air of your overblown opinion.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
Looking like an idiot has been a life calling for you Vinny. Damo is just calling it like everyone else sees it.

You've got your ego so far up your own fanny the only thing you smell is the fetid air of your overblown opinion.
Click to expand...

Notice folk, that this silly woman NEVER debates the issue with me...all she does is just show up to join another poster in a personal dig or slam. The ONLY reason she's come out from behind other's skirts here is because I exposed her racist reputation note on another thread.

She's just bitter because I use to whup her sorry ass time and again on another discussion site years ago. A little grudge holder, our Loyal End...pity she doesn't have the brains or stomach for a real debate.
 
tom prendergast said:
It wasn't that funny, but there is substance to your charge.
Click to expand...

All I did was refer him to a post where I disproved (with extreme prejudice) another poster on that subject. There's not ONE poster on these boards that hasn't been guilty of "substance" of that charge at one time or another. His retort was a bit over the top, as I pointed out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top