Good news about deficit

Yurt said:
odd how it went down when dems came to power in both houses

don't be stupid as usual...the president has little to do with the stock market then and now...i'm really surprised you consider yourself a savvy investor
Click to expand...


So the Dems came to power in both Houses in October 2008? That's not how I remember things.
 
Yurt said:
odd how it went down when dems came to power in both houses

don't be stupid as usual...the president has little to do with the stock market then and now...i'm really surprised you consider yourself a savvy investor
Click to expand...

I'll match success with you any day spurtage.
Please knock off the nobody does that game. Reagan blamed Carter, Clinton blamed Bush, Obama blamed Bush. Plus look up the fact's spurtage, it's true I look at companies not politics. But the fact is the market does .5% better per year under democrats a number I'm sure Obama will raise further.:clink:
 
evince said:
The right should quit crashing the economy while in office if they dont want to have a democrat come in and clean it up next time.


Its like the Frat boys partying and puking all over the frat house and then getting pissed at the remodeling contractor spending money to clean it up.


At least the remodeling company is trying to save money on suplies to rebuild what the frat boys pissed and puked all over.
Click to expand...

THIS!!!!!
 
Topspin said:
I'll match success with you any day spurtage.
Please knock off the nobody does that game. Reagan blamed Carter, Clinton blamed Bush, Obama blamed Bush. Plus look up the fact's spurtage, it's true I look at companies not politics. But the fact is the market does .5% better per year under democrats a number I'm sure Obama will raise further.:clink:
Click to expand...

what was the stock market at the beginning of reagan's term and what was it at the end of bush I term?
 
NigelTufnel said:
Near zero? I cannot think of any measure of the market that puts the rate of return at close to break even for the entirety of Bush's term. The market tanked under Bush.
Click to expand...

Correct.... it was roughly 10500 when Bush took office and roughly 8000 when he left.

All thanks to Clinton and a bipartisan Congress repealing Glass Steagall, not to mention 50 years of deficit spending by the idiots in DC.
 
Topspin said:
I'll match success with you any day spurtage.
Please knock off the nobody does that game. Reagan blamed Carter, Clinton blamed Bush, Obama blamed Bush. Plus look up the fact's spurtage, it's true I look at companies not politics. But the fact is the market does .5% better per year under democrats a number I'm sure Obama will raise further.:clink:
Click to expand...

and what does it do under Republican led Congresses vs. Democrat led Congresses?

How about what it does when snowfall in January is exceeded by snowfall in February?

Or perhaps what it does under mixed power? ie... one party controls one of the Houses and the other party control two?

Also toppy... what year does your averages go back to?
 
Last edited:
tinfoil said:
it's pretty funny that the queen of crying about deficits is trumpeting an 8% reduction in deficit spending as some kind of incredible achievement. Hahah hilarious. Seriously deshrubinator, you spent 8 long years complaining about similar stuff. Do you even realize how partisan you are? You might not... probably not, in fact. LOL what a joke
Click to expand...

WTF stir?


You are aware of where much of the debt incurred under Obama has come from right?

Wars Bush never paid for, TARP, and stimulus to try and slow down the fucking decline Bush and friends set in motion.


Where was YOUR concern for the deficit when all this was mess was beoing created??................... Oh yeah you were cheering it huh?
 
evince said:
WTF stir?


You are aware of where much of the debt incurred under Obama has come from right?

Wars Bush never paid for, TARP, and stimulus to try and slow down the fucking decline Bush and friends set in motion.


Where was YOUR concern for the deficit when all this was mess was beoing created??................... Oh yeah you were cheering it huh?
Click to expand...

So your argument is that two wrongs make a right?
 
evince said:
WTF stir?


You are aware of where much of the debt incurred under Obama has come from right?

Wars Bush never paid for, TARP, and stimulus to try and slow down the fucking decline Bush and friends set in motion.


Where was YOUR concern for the deficit when all this was mess was beoing created??................... Oh yeah you were cheering it huh?
Click to expand...

1) Actually, the Dems have been in control of Congress since 2007. The largest deficits started under DEM control. CONGRESS passes the budget Desh... the President gives input and signs the budget.

2) The decline was set in motion by Clinton when he repealed Glass Steagall. Certainly Bush did not help, but he did not start this.... and since you are intent on blaming only the President at the time the mess was set in motion, well... that would be your beloved Clinton.

3) There are TRILLIONS in unfunded liabilities that were created by DEMS... so it is quite amusing to continue watching lemmings like you rant about Bush not paying for his wars (which is accurate).... given how much our idiots in DC in both parties continue to spend that which they do not have.
 
Superfreak said:
1) Actually, the Dems have been in control of Congress since 2007. The largest deficits started under DEM control. CONGRESS passes the budget Desh... the President gives input and signs the budget.The recession started in dec 2007 and was created by a lack of oversite and good regulation. There is no doubt in any sane persons mind which party fought for deregulations for decades and then sat back and watched their IDEAS crash the world economy instead of taking the nessesary actions to avert or minimise the damage. WHEN will you face the fact that it is the Republican economic tenents thwat caused this mess?

2) The decline was set in motion by Clinton when he repealed Glass Steagall. Certainly Bush did not help, but he did not start this.... and since you are intent on blaming only the President at the time the mess was set in motion, well... that would be your beloved Clinton.Nope the decline was set in motion by the CEOs of the industries corps who took this freedom and FUCKED the entire world with their GREED.Bush and team REFUSED to face this fact and allowed the FUCKING to continue to Up their economic numbers.If they had acted in the best interest of the American people they would have pissed off their base and would have not seen a second term. Clinton was an asshole for trusting the industry not to fuck us but Bush gets the blame for standing by and allowing his constituients to stuff their pockets full of cash while we were raped. You cant have it both ways. You cant talk dems into believing the partys tenents and then BLAME only the dems who were stupid or BOUGHT enough to back you ideas when they fail. Yes EVERY fucking dem who bought this REPUBLICAN idea was either bought, stupid or both

3) There are TRILLIONS in unfunded liabilities that were created by DEMS... so it is quite amusing to continue watching lemmings like you rant about Bush not paying for his wars (which is accurate).... given how much our idiots in DC in both parties continue to spend that which they do not have.And many of them are needed programs unlike the WARS that Bush caused with his inability to keep this country safe from attack and did merely for corporate gain. Do you think any republicans are planing to fund them or cut them while in office? The facts are the republican party of the last 30 years have been economic assholes. The dems have been far better. The tea baggers would do the same damn thing the Rs would do.
Click to expand...
If anyone truely cares about the US economy they would be better off voting democratic in all elections right up until the time that the Corps then buy enough dems to have their bidding done. At that point you guys better have your shit together and some knew ideas that actually work if you want to save this country. EVERY minute people back this current R party or their even worse splinter groups like the tea baggers we step closer to the tipping point of democratic buyout. Im begging you people to get some new ideas that work and quit backing the failed ideas of your past.
 
evince said:
If anyone truely cares about the US economy they would be better off voting democratic in all elections right up until the time that the Corps then buy enough dems to have their bidding done. At that point you guys better have your shit together and some knew ideas that actually work if you want to save this country. EVERY minute people back this current R party or their even worse splinter groups like the tea baggers we step closer to the tipping point of democratic buyout. Im begging you people to get some new ideas that work and quit backing the failed ideas of your past.
Click to expand...

You're mentally ill, blabbering on, devoid of reasonfullness.
 
Funny, what would be the reaction of Cons if this turnaround was occuring had McCain been in office....
 
Oh how cute , our little Assy has taken to me.

Dude dont try to get me to join in on your personal pain.

Get yourself right in the head and come back when you have something of substance to say.

Then we can see if there is any actual brain cells for you to rub together.

Until you learn how to be a human being in real life you are of little worth here in the cyberworld of these internets tubes.
 
Jarod said:
Funny, what would be the reaction of Cons if this turnaround was occuring had McCain been in office....
Click to expand...

What do you think yours would had been Jarod? Would you still have been on here trying to tout all economic news as good? Talking about how much money you are making? Calling liberals hypocrites for everything?
 
Intel's earnings were very promising sign last night.

Im betting another tech boom is on the way with cloud computing. We are so close to a major change in how we do business and personal computing. Soon it will no longer be desk tops and laptops but just terminals that connect to networks/Internets.
 
Chapdog said:
Intel's earnings were very promising sign last night.

Im betting another tech boom is on the way with cloud computing. We are so close to a major change in how we do business and personal computing. Soon it will no longer be desk tops and laptops but just terminals that connect to networks/Internets.
Click to expand...

You're talking about mainframe computing. It's old.
 
evince said:
Oh how cute , our little Assy has taken to me.

Dude dont try to get me to join in on your personal pain.

Get yourself right in the head and come back when you have something of substance to say.

Then we can see if there is any actual brain cells for you to rub together.

Until you learn how to be a human being in real life you are of little worth here in the cyberworld of these internets tubes.
Click to expand...

i have something of subtance. You're just foolish if you think dems aren't on the corporate payroll. You're marvilously ignorant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top