FCC Releases RAW ’60 Minutes’ Train Wreck Interview with Kamala Harris

christiefan915 said:
Is this the interview where VP trump is suing CBS for $10 BILLION dollars? Couldn't have been that bad.
Click to expand...


The release of the uncut Kamala Harris interview by "60 Minutes" was prompted by several factors:
  1. FCC Inquiry and Public Pressure: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under Chairman Brendan Carr requested the full, unedited transcript and camera feeds of the interview. This request came in response to public and political pressure following allegations of deceptive editing by CBS to favor Kamala Harris during her interview. The controversy escalated when former President Donald Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against CBS News, alleging that the network edited the interview to support Harris's campaign in the presidential election.
  2. Trump's Lawsuit: The lawsuit claimed that CBS News manipulated the interview to mislead voters by airing different edits of Harris's responses, which were perceived as an attempt to make her appear more coherent and presidential. The legal action and the subsequent demand for transparency likely influenced CBS to comply with the FCC's request to release the unedited material.
  3. Public Interest and Media Scrutiny: There was significant backlash on social media and in various news outlets questioning the integrity of the interview's editing. This scrutiny, along with a general demand for transparency in media, especially during an election period, put pressure on CBS to disclose the unedited interview. Posts on platforms like X highlighted public sentiment and called for CBS to release the full transcript to clarify what was edited out.
  4. Legal Obligations: CBS complied with the FCC's demand for the raw footage and transcripts, which they were legally compelled to provide. The FCC planned to open the material for public comment, which further necessitated the release of the unedited interview to address concerns about journalistic integrity and possible bias.
  5. Settlement Talks: There were hints of ongoing settlement discussions between Trump and CBS News's parent company, Paramount Global, regarding the lawsuit. CBS's release of the material might have been part of a strategy to manage public perception and potentially mitigate legal repercussions or facilitate a settlement.


@Grok
 
volsrock1 said:
DEI and sucking cock made it possible
Click to expand...


No, it is not just that. Such unseemly things may have had an impact, but that's not the whole story.


I think she is cunning. Not intellectually brilliant, but clever and devious.


She plays stupid, in some situations, to provide maneuvering options and cover.


If you think she is just a dumb woman of poor moral standards, she is much less of a threat.

-
 
countryboy said:
Trump interviews and pressers are only a "train wreck" to leftist loons, due to their irrational seething hatred of the man.
Click to expand...


It appears that many imperceptive people are intolerant of the mannerisms and habits of 45/47.

He can't - or won't - assume the carefully-curated mannerisms of the career politician that is the only frame of reference many of them have conditioned themselves to accept.

He usually speaks ex tempore, with all that implies.

Does he ramble? Yes.

Is his line of reasoning sometimes hard to follow? It may be, for some. If you're one of them, perhaps the difficulty is yours.

Does that mean he's foolish? Perhaps, in some instances.

Does his public exposition of thoughts and habitual speculation make him a figure of derision to many people who expect leaders to weigh their words and parse them with advisors before uttering them? Undoubtedly.

Consider:

Geniuses, like anyone else, can exhibit a wide range of behaviors, but there are some observations and anecdotes that might suggest a connection between genius, rambling, and thinking out loud:

  • Historical Examples: Many historical figures known for their genius, such as Albert Einstein, are noted for their tendency to think out loud or engage in soliloquy. Einstein, for instance, was known for his thought experiments, which he might have verbalized to himself or others as part of his process.
  • Cognitive Process: Thinking out loud can be part of the cognitive process for some individuals. It might help in organizing thoughts, exploring ideas, or finding solutions to complex problems. This externalization of thought can be particularly useful in fields like physics, philosophy, or creative arts where complex ideas need to be dissected and understood from multiple angles.
  • Rambling as Exploration: What might be perceived as rambling could actually be an exploration of possibilities or a deep dive into a subject matter. Geniuses often engage in what seems like aimless thought to others because they are following a mental path that is not immediately obvious to those around them.
  • Personality Traits: Some geniuses might have personality traits that align with conditions like ADHD, where individuals might talk more or seem to ramble due to a high level of mental activity or distractibility. However, this is not universally true for all geniuses.
  • Cultural and Social Context: In some cultures or social settings, thinking out loud might be more acceptable or even encouraged. In environments where innovation and creativity are valued, this behavior might be seen as a sign of deep engagement with one's work.
  • Research and Anecdotal Evidence: While there isn't a plethora of scientific studies directly linking genius to rambling, anecdotal evidence from biographies, interviews, and historical accounts often portrays geniuses in this light.


@Grok
 
BartenderElite said:
Man, is that a boring response.
Click to expand...
Since you struggle with analogies, I'm about to send you into a tailspin of bewilderment with this brain teaser. You calling anyone's comments boring is like the pot calling the kettle black. LOL I made that one up on the fly. I know it's a bit tricky how I use a 'talking pot that understands color' but I did it just the same.
 
AProudLefty said:
Look! He lets @Grok do the thinking for him!

The defense of Trump is cute indeed.
Click to expand...
I highly recommend you do the same. At least you might post something accurate and interesting.

Let me respond for you.."maybe you should" or maybe "you're the one against DEI" LOL
 
volsrock1 said:



The FULL Kamala Harris interview that they butchered and severely edited to make her sound like she had a functional brain stem.

She does not. We dodged a bullet.

Kamala is retarded.
Click to expand...
Obvious to all, if that was a Trump interview the televised version would be nothing but the embarrassing answers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top