For All You Climate Nutters Out There

@gfm7175 apparently believes that trash and litter magically vanish from the streets because, clearly, if there was no trash being picked up, every major city would be over their heads in garbage.

Maybe there are some kind of magical garbage elves that come out of hiding at night and pick up all the trash?
 
@gfm7175 apparently believes that trash and litter magically vanish from the streets because, clearly, if there was no trash being picked up, every major city would be over their heads in garbage.

Maybe there are some kind of magical garbage elves that come out of hiding at night and pick up all the trash?
You reallly think so? That must be why Democrat run cities stink so bad.
 
You reallly think so? That must be why Democrat run cities stink so bad.
What do you think? The state of New York has existed for over 400 years, which means that New York City must have existed for a comparable length of time. Given the number of people that live in New York City, combined with how long the city has been in existence, what do you think the city would look like if trash was not picked up for about 400 years?

How about San Francisco? It has been around for almost 250 years. How do you think it would look by now if no trash was picked up for 250 fucking years?
 
What do you think? The state of New York has existed for over 400 years, which means that New York City must have existed for a comparable length of time. Given the number of people that live in New York City, combined with how long the city has been in existence, what do you think the city would look like if trash was not picked up for about 400 years?

How about San Francisco? It has been around for almost 250 years. How do you think it would look by now if no trash was picked up for 250 fucking years?
Like they do now.
 
To clarify.... people who live in cities that have trash on the street, shouldn't be concerned about concerned/worried about climate change?

britney-confused-gif.gif
They should not worry, it's not healthy to worry about things you have no control over. The trash in the streets, people do have control over that, it's called picking up trash when you see it or better yet, don't throw it on the ground in the first place. Climate change is an absurd statement. Weather change is a thing, it's always changing, literally every moment in time represents a change from the moment before. Is that what the climate change people are talking about?
 
They should not worry, it's not healthy to worry about things you have no control over. The trash in the streets, people do have control over that, it's called picking up trash when you see it or better yet, don't throw it on the ground in the first place. Climate change is an absurd statement. Weather change is a thing, it's always changing, literally every moment in time represents a change from the moment before. Is that what the climate change people are talking about?
Climate change refers to significant, long-term shifts in the Earth's climate patterns, particularly changes in average temperatures, precipitation, and weather events. It’s largely driven by human activities, especially since the Industrial Revolution, when we started burning fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gas at scale. This releases greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O)—into the atmosphere, which trap heat and warm the planet. Deforestation and industrial processes amplify this effect.
The data backs this up: global average temperatures have risen about 1.1°C (2°F) since pre-industrial levels, according to the IPCC’s 2021 report. Sea levels are up roughly 20 cm (8 inches) in the last century, and extreme weather—hurricanes, droughts, heatwaves—has gotten more frequent and intense. NASA’s records show CO₂ levels at 420 parts per million in 2023, the highest in at least 800,000 years, based on ice core samples.
Natural factors, like volcanic eruptions or solar cycles, play a minor role, but the overwhelming driver is anthropogenic emissions. Skeptics often point to historical climate shifts—like the Medieval Warm Period—but those were regional, not global, and didn’t coincide with a 50% increase in atmospheric CO₂ from human activity.
Effects? Melting ice caps, shifting ecosystems, and tougher conditions for agriculture. Mitigation involves cutting emissions—renewables, reforestation, carbon capture—while adaptation means building resilience, like flood defenses or drought-resistant crops. The debate’s not really about whether it’s happening; it’s about how fast and what to do.

@Grok
 
Simple question.

Why don't you lefties first go around your own cities and pick up all of the disgusting trash that is laying around everywhere one tries to walk before obsessing over "global climate crisis"?

For supposedly "caring about the environment", you lefties sure have the most disgusting trashiest cities that I've ever seen, cities in which it's impossible to walk around anywhere without seeing a bunch of empty monster cans, beer cans, used masks, plastic bags, etc etc etc laying around EVERYWHERE............

How about cleaning up YOUR OWN IMMEDIATE ENVIRONMENT first? How about removing the beam from your own eye before considering the mote in your brother's eye?
^^^
Mszp1M0.gif
 
Climate change refers to significant, long-term shifts in the Earth's climate patterns, particularly changes in average temperatures, precipitation, and weather events. It’s largely driven by human activities, especially since the Industrial Revolution, when we started burning fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gas at scale. This releases greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O)—into the atmosphere, which trap heat and warm the planet. Deforestation and industrial processes amplify this effect.
The data backs this up: global average temperatures have risen about 1.1°C (2°F) since pre-industrial levels, according to the IPCC’s 2021 report. Sea levels are up roughly 20 cm (8 inches) in the last century, and extreme weather—hurricanes, droughts, heatwaves—has gotten more frequent and intense. NASA’s records show CO₂ levels at 420 parts per million in 2023, the highest in at least 800,000 years, based on ice core samples.
Natural factors, like volcanic eruptions or solar cycles, play a minor role, but the overwhelming driver is anthropogenic emissions. Skeptics often point to historical climate shifts—like the Medieval Warm Period—but those were regional, not global, and didn’t coincide with a 50% increase in atmospheric CO₂ from human activity.
Effects? Melting ice caps, shifting ecosystems, and tougher conditions for agriculture. Mitigation involves cutting emissions—renewables, reforestation, carbon capture—while adaptation means building resilience, like flood defenses or drought-resistant crops. The debate’s not really about whether it’s happening; it’s about how fast and what to do.

@Grok
MAGAts are poorly educated not because of our schools or the teacher's union but because they are stupid as JPP proves daily.
 
You should see most of their homes. I'll never forget going to sell a job when I wore a young mans clothes at a couple of granola sandal wearing types and nearly vomited from the sites and smells I saw in their home. It was far worse than I could've imagined without seeing it myself.

That was the most extreme example of many others. Libtards in general live like pigs and often have a peculiar smell to go with it.

You're right, start with the basics, personal hygiene, your own house, your own yard, your own town or city, your own State, and then and only then start thinking about bigger things beyond your control, but even then, try offering possible solutions rather than bitch and moan about others.
QED
 
Climate change refers to significant, long-term shifts in the Earth's climate patterns, particularly changes in average temperatures, precipitation, and weather events. It’s largely driven by human activities, especially since the Industrial Revolution, when we started burning fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gas at scale. This releases greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄), and nitrous oxide (N₂O)—into the atmosphere, which trap heat and warm the planet. Deforestation and industrial processes amplify this effect.
The data backs this up: global average temperatures have risen about 1.1°C (2°F) since pre-industrial levels, according to the IPCC’s 2021 report. Sea levels are up roughly 20 cm (8 inches) in the last century, and extreme weather—hurricanes, droughts, heatwaves—has gotten more frequent and intense. NASA’s records show CO₂ levels at 420 parts per million in 2023, the highest in at least 800,000 years, based on ice core samples.
Natural factors, like volcanic eruptions or solar cycles, play a minor role, but the overwhelming driver is anthropogenic emissions. Skeptics often point to historical climate shifts—like the Medieval Warm Period—but those were regional, not global, and didn’t coincide with a 50% increase in atmospheric CO₂ from human activity.
Effects? Melting ice caps, shifting ecosystems, and tougher conditions for agriculture. Mitigation involves cutting emissions—renewables, reforestation, carbon capture—while adaptation means building resilience, like flood defenses or drought-resistant crops. The debate’s not really about whether it’s happening; it’s about how fast and what to do.

@Grok
I have Grok too. Do you have any thoughts of your own? Also, I'm not sure if you're aware how AI works. I get the feeling you think whatever Grok says must be true. LOL not exactly. I could demonstrate if I thought you could understand, but that's not likely so I won't bother.
 
I have Grok too. Do you have any thoughts of your own? Also, I'm not sure if you're aware how AI works. I get the feeling you think whatever Grok says must be true. LOL not exactly. I could demonstrate if I thought you could understand, but that's not likely so I won't bother.
And again.
 
I have Grok too. Do you have any thoughts of your own? Also, I'm not sure if you're aware how AI works. I get the feeling you think whatever Grok says must be true. LOL not exactly. I could demonstrate if I thought you could understand, but that's not likely so I won't bother.
Will you bother to tell @Legion the same?
 
Back
Top