Changing my tune? I never accused the Evangelicals in general.
Ignoring this example I gave to you?
View attachment 45385
You did many times. Quit lying (well, lying is a lefty mantra).
You gave no example.
![]()
Why does my calling out the FAR RIGHT Evangelicals bug you so much? Are you saying you're a part of them?
Are you ignoring the abuse done by churches, especially by the Catholic Church?
Did I say all Evangelicals? It seems to be a sore spot for you.You still can't produce anything that Evangelicals are hurting children.
Oh, so now you are fingering churches in general, specifically Catholic churches?
Any child molesters should be shot, and I've said that many times.
You came to this thread, started by a despicable cunt, hating on Evangelicals and added your nonsense.
this is why you lost.Make no mistake about it, when they talk about removing basic human rights from gay people, they are talking about killing them.
... for responding to a statement that was not made. Did your deaf-studies omit English comprehension as well? ... or is this your way of admitting that yes, you still believe that you speak for countless, unnamed political opponents?My apologies.
Of course, you think that total ambiguity is perfect clarity.I thought his usage of the term "they" was clear in who he was referring to.
Perhaps. Do you think that helps? My question is why do you believe you somehow speak for them?Perhaps I should have said the far right Evangelicals and those who follow them?
You are answering questions that are not asked and not answering the questions that are asked.Does the term "far right" hurt you? I did not say all Evangelicals.
77% of all terrorism in America is from the alt-right.
Nordberg, Global Warming, Climate Change, DEI and Marxism are all on the left.It is sad that the right uses religion as a cover for their hate.
Oh, I see you are talking about those HATERS. I have news for you, God apparently only makes HATERS out of the homosexuals on the left.God makes some people gay.
I see that you join AProudLefty in pretending to speak for countless unnamed political opponents.The Reds feel more qualified than god to judge his creations.
Religion was the shield for Obama, Clinton and Biden.Religion was the shield for the KKK
It's a complex question fallacy, dumbass.You are answering questions that are not asked and not answering the questions that are asked.
What has any Evangelical done to injure you?
Do you have an issue with the term "far right"?... for responding to a statement that was not made. Did your deaf-studies omit English comprehension as well? ... or is this your way of admitting that yes, you still believe that you speak for countless, unnamed political opponents?
Of course, you think that total ambiguity is perfect clarity.
Perhaps. Do you think that helps? My question is why do you believe you somehow speak for them?
Nope. You are making a dumbass fallacy and a deaf-studies-failure fallacy. Not everybody can do what you do.It's a complex question fallacy, dumbass.
You didn't answer my question. Why do you believe that you somehow speak for Evangelicals? Shall I just assume that your deaf-studies taught you to believe that?Do you have an issue with the term "far right"?
What did I say to suggest that Evangelicals (in general) hurt me?Nope. You are making a dumbass fallacy and a deaf-studies-failure fallacy. Not everybody can do what you do.