AOC facing expulsion from Congress, and revocation of national security clearance.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
They do have a legal right to ask for asylum.
Click to expand...
Awesome pivot! ... or should we all just assume that you mistakenly believe that because any human on the planet may request asylum that all illegal immigrants therefore have a right to remain in the US?

My advice to you stays the same; you aren't going to magically become smart by remaining a leftist. Clinging to leftist/Marxist ideologies will only continue to drain your mental voltage until the battery is dead. There might be time to save yourself.
 
IBDaMann said:
Awesome pivot! ... or should we all just assume that you mistakenly believe that because any human on the planet may request asylum that all illegal immigrants therefore have a right to remain in the US?

My advice to you stays the same; you aren't going to magically become smart by remaining a leftist. Clinging to leftist/Marxist ideologies will only continue to drain your mental voltage until the battery is dead. There might be time to save yourself.
Click to expand...
Sorry ass name calling. When did your battery die?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Sorry ass name calling.
Click to expand...
The correct spellings are "sorry-ass" and "name-calling." If you weren't so dumbed-down from your totally defunct leftist political ideology, you might have been able to learn this at some point.

Observations are not name-calling. Look, I'm here for you. Feel free to run stuff by me before you post.
 
Kurmugeon said:
I don't know the veracity of the following video, but the issues it raises are important to the current political scene.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yw78k0AnSRM



If the claims in this video are true and correct, then AOC is facing prison time for her actions.


Times are a changing...
Click to expand...
Right, some you tube video by a nobody proves it, AOC is going to jail

If a Red Hat Clubber saw on social media that Trump shit 100% pure gold they would believe it
 
IBDaMann said:
There really isn't any veracity. You'll notice that Pam Bondi hasn't issued any statements, and she won't until she feels sufficiently emboldened to challenge Alé Cortez' 1st Amendment rights ... which I don't think will ever happen.


Perhaps, but the 1st Amendment reigns supreme and that will be the final word on the matter.


... well, they are exaggerated.


Alé Cortez is currently seeking clarity as to whether she is being investigated. If she is, then she has a substantive impeachable offense against Trump and will be celebrating through to Senate deliberations. It is illegal to investigate anyone for exercising his 1st Amendment rights; the investigation itself is a coercive/retaliatory attack against the 1st Amendment.

No prosecution of anyone's exercising of his 1st Amendment rights will survive through the Supreme Court, but the prosecution itself will set Trump up for impeachment.
Click to expand...
Why do you think supporting criminal activity is part of the 1st amendment???
 
IBDaMann said:
The correct spellings are "sorry-ass" and "name-calling." If you weren't so dumbed-down from your totally defunct leftist political ideology, you might have been able to learn this at some point.

Observations are not name-calling. Look, I'm here for you. Feel free to run stuff by me before you post.
Click to expand...
Aahhh.. did your sorry ass get all bent out of shape by trying to be a grammar Nazi?
 
Into the Night said:
Why do you think supporting criminal activity is part of the 1st amendment???
Click to expand...
You are being dishonest in your question by using the word "supporting," as though you can shoehorn any protected speech into the "aiding and abetting" pigeon hole. I would fire your question back at you: What information are you claiming is illegal under the 1st Amendment?

Of course the issue you raise was resolved long ago by the publishing of the Anarchist Cookbook. All the books content, how to build explosives, making and using moletov cocktails, fashioning lock picks, improvising firearms, sabotage strategies, etc. have been upheld as protected speech.

Bottom Line: You may not like it, but as long as Alé Cortez is only explaining how to do something and providing information, it's protected free speech under the 1st Amendment.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Aahhh.. did your sorry ass get all bent out of shape by trying to be a grammar Nazi?
Click to expand...
I merely pointed out one small third-grade error on your part as a courtesy to you. You could have thanked me.

Why did you pivot entirely away from, and thus totally ignore, the part of my post that caused you to panic and to flee to the hills?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top