The Dem's Broken Record: ...You Racists!1!!

Does anyone besides me think the Democrats are going to regret squandering all of this time with the repeated cries and bleats of "racism" against the right?

I mean, I totally understand the Saul Alinsky method of pounding away at your adversary with scurrilous allegations and innuendos, but it's another 6 months until the mid-term elections, and this "racist" shit has been going on since before Obama was elected. How long can they continue to use it as a shield to protect them from accountability? If anyone dares to criticize this administration, that seems to be the 'go-to' response from liberals, we're just "racists" who can't stand that a black man is president!

I think, after a while, it just becomes rhetorical and petty, and doesn't help them a bit, and will actually start to have the opposite effect. I can see black people eventually becoming repulsed at how the liberal elite want to compare everything with civil rights and the plight of African-Americans in this country, and therefore 'cheapening' the struggle they went through, by making erroneous comparisons. I'm not saying the black community will bolt to the GOP in November, but maybe they don't show up at the polls with the enthusiastic support they've had in the past for the Democrats? I think that is a very real possibility, and it would spell absolute disaster for the party. Especially against the tide of growing support in the Tea Party movement.

Now, I am the type of person who it doesn't really bother to be called a racist, I get that all the time because I am proud of my Southern heritage, and make no bones about it, although I have never had any racist beliefs, and my lineage kind of makes racism a moot point, being that I am part African-American and part Native-American myself. Racist viewpoints would be somewhat 'self-defeating' for me, from my perspective, but if people want to call me names because they don't like something I have to say, or don't like my avatar, or whatever... it's a free country, it doesn't bother me. But a lot of people aren't like me, they don't appreciate being called "racist" and insulted that way, it really pisses them off. Especially if they are moderate or independent and don't really "belong" to the Tea Party or GOP, but agree with something they are saying. Most of these people are open-minded enough to give the Dems a chance to win them back over, but they are choosing to denigrate and insult them instead. I just don't think the strategy will work on these swing voters, I could be wrong, maybe some of them can be cajoled into supporting the Democrats to escape being called names and such, I just don't see that working large-scale to win over their votes.

But now, really, 6 more months of this? Is THAT what we have to look forward to from Democrat leadership? I thought Obama ushered in the era of "post-racial" America?
 
Does anyone besides me think the Democrats are going to regret squandering all of this time with the repeated cries and bleats of "racism" against the right?

I mean, I totally understand the Saul Alinsky method of pounding away at your adversary with scurrilous allegations and innuendos, but it's another 6 months until the mid-term elections, and this "racist" shit has been going on since before Obama was elected. How long can they continue to use it as a shield to protect them from accountability? If anyone dares to criticize this administration, that seems to be the 'go-to' response from liberals, we're just "racists" who can't stand that a black man is president!

I think, after a while, it just becomes rhetorical and petty, and doesn't help them a bit, and will actually start to have the opposite effect. I can see black people eventually becoming repulsed at how the liberal elite want to compare everything with civil rights and the plight of African-Americans in this country, and therefore 'cheapening' the struggle they went through, by making erroneous comparisons. I'm not saying the black community will bolt to the GOP in November, but maybe they don't show up at the polls with the enthusiastic support they've had in the past for the Democrats? I think that is a very real possibility, and it would spell absolute disaster for the party. Especially against the tide of growing support in the Tea Party movement.

Now, I am the type of person who it doesn't really bother to be called a racist, I get that all the time because I am proud of my Southern heritage, and make no bones about it, although I have never had any racist beliefs, and my lineage kind of makes racism a moot point, being that I am part African-American and part Native-American myself. Racist viewpoints would be somewhat 'self-defeating' for me, from my perspective, but if people want to call me names because they don't like something I have to say, or don't like my avatar, or whatever... it's a free country, it doesn't bother me. But a lot of people aren't like me, they don't appreciate being called "racist" and insulted that way, it really pisses them off. Especially if they are moderate or independent and don't really "belong" to the Tea Party or GOP, but agree with something they are saying. Most of these people are open-minded enough to give the Dems a chance to win them back over, but they are choosing to denigrate and insult them instead. I just don't think the strategy will work on these swing voters, I could be wrong, maybe some of them can be cajoled into supporting the Democrats to escape being called names and such, I just don't see that working large-scale to win over their votes.

But now, really, 6 more months of this? Is THAT what we have to look forward to from Democrat leadership? I thought Obama ushered in the era of "post-racial" America?

Does anyone besides me think the Republicans are going to regret squandering all of this time with the repeated cries and bleats of "socialism" against the left?
 
This country IS headed for socialism with your almighty God Obama in charge.

You sound like an 8th grader with that. And dixie sounds like a GED with his constant pinhead liberal comments. We all know progressives are the higher educated group.
 
i hope the dems continue to play the race card....it will backfire on them come election time....

its actually sad that many democrats don't believe a black president is equal to a white president....that in order to defend his policies or actions, one must cry racism instead of actually discussing the policies or actions...
 
Obama wouldn't have been elected if he was white.

OK, I do agree with some of what you post but on this right here I have to disagree. I think I could have beaten McCain....but then I'm not white either. Oops, I forgot. The point is that almost any candidate that pulled off the moderate postitions Obama took could have beaten McCain. He was not the best candidate for the Republicans.
 
OK, I do agree with some of what you post but on this right here I have to disagree. I think I could have beaten McCain....but then I'm not white either. Oops, I forgot. The point is that almost any candidate that pulled off the moderate postitions Obama took could have beaten McCain. He was not the best candidate for the Republicans.

I agree, McCain was a poor choice for the Republicans, but he only lost to Obama by a few percentage points, it was not a 'landslide' for Democrats. Obama did this by being a skilled politician who essentially lied his way to election by constantly taking all sides of every issue, depending on what 'crowd' he was appealing to. His strategy relied on two essential things, the vitriol towards George W. Bush and Republicans, and the utter stupidity of the voter, to take him at his ever-changing word.

I don't know that I disagree with the point about his race, because a great deal of Americans voted for Obama on that issue alone. Many people simply got caught up in the "historic moment" of electing the first black president. While there were certainly people who voted against him because of his race, the overwhelming majority of Americans are not racist, and did not vote against him for that reason. It is far more likely he gained votes because he was black, but whether or not it was the difference, we'll never really know for certain.
 
the fossil lost by millions of votes and way more voted against Obama because he was black than voted for him because of it.
 
back up people voted for him because he was black, you teabaggers are morons.

about 6-8% more blacks did, already ran the numbers with nigel...as to who else did, i have no idea...

are you going to back up your assertion, because i am calling total bullshit
 
Funny, you expect Topspin to "back up his assertion" yet you give Dixie a pass on his "assertions".

Now why is that?

Your double standard is showing...again.

its not a double standard, topspin has nothing to back up his claim...i don't care about dixie's claim and i've already shown that about 6-8 percent of the blacks votely for him due to race...there are also a few black republicans who publicly said they would vote for him becuase of the historic nature of the race....

so of course i would topspin to back his claim up and not dixie as i already knwo people did becuase he was black
 
about 6-8% more blacks did, already ran the numbers with nigel...as to who else did, i have no idea...

are you going to back up your assertion, because i am calling total bullshit

your calling yourself a bs artist fool. There is zero way to prove someone voted for a person soley because of color. Only in a racist mind. BURN
 
OK, I do agree with some of what you post but on this right here I have to disagree. I think I could have beaten McCain....but then I'm not white either. Oops, I forgot. The point is that almost any candidate that pulled off the moderate postitions Obama took could have beaten McCain. He was not the best candidate for the Republicans.
Actually, I'm not talking about McCain at all, but the Democrat primary. How did Hillary lose to a junior Senator with almost no experience, a voting record supporting the most heinous abortion procedures and ties to radical leftists?

Nice deflection though. You started a little war amongst these other posters.
 
Actually, I'm not talking about McCain at all, but the Democrat primary. How did Hillary lose to a junior Senator with almost no experience, a voting record supporting the most heinous abortion procedures and ties to radical leftists?

by not taking him seriously till it was too late, same formula Mcfossil used. Now how do you beat him?
 
Back
Top