Homan: "We're not stopping. I don't care what the judges think. I don't care what the left thinks. We're coming."

AProudLefty said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1901651059962994870
View: https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1901651059962994870?t=se-LmRlmpSKtuMeq6L6bmw&s=19


The party of Law and Order. :thup:
Click to expand...
Yup. Pro cop... the party of pro cop. I think too many folks get the second part wrong. Do you remember a time when republicans were all, "boy, we love how the courts try to regulate things!"? Yeah... neither does Pepperidge Farm.

If to you "law and order" is following what the courts say, then neither Biden or Trump is part of the "party of law and order", both ignored court orders.
 
Damocles said:
Yup. Pro cop... the party of pro cop. I think too many folks get the second part wrong. Do you remember a time when republicans were all, "boy, we love how the courts try to regulate things!"? Yeah... neither does Pepperidge Farm.

If to you "law and order" is following what the courts say, then neither Biden or Trump is part of the "party of law and order", both ignored court orders.
Click to expand...
Bringing up Biden indicates agreement.

If it was wrong for Biden, then it's wrong for Trump
 
The far left judge ignored the checks and balances in the Constitution that allows the POTUS to conduct foreign policy.

The judge will lose on appeal.
 
AProudLefty said:
Bringing up Biden indicates agreement.

If it was wrong for Biden, then it's wrong for Trump
Click to expand...
Well, the agreement part also indicates agreement. Though I changed it from "law and order" to pro cop. I think the republicans are almost slavishly pro cop... and that neither of the two parties are "law and order" when it is inconvenient for them to be "law and order" as you were defining it.
 
AProudLefty said:
You tried to tell us that the Constitution will be suspended? Well I guess you did.
Click to expand...
The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a U.S. federal law, formally titled part of “An Act Concerning Aliens,” codified under 50 U.S.C. §§ 21–24. It grants the President broad authority during a declared war or when there’s an invasion or predatory incursion by a foreign nation or government to apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove “alien enemies” — individuals who are natives, citizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government involved, and who are 14 years or older and not naturalized U.S. citizens. The law applies only in specific wartime or emergency contexts and requires the President to issue a public proclamation defining the scope of enforcement.


Historically, it’s one of four laws passed as the Alien and Sedition Acts during a tense period of potential conflict with France. Unlike its companion laws, which expired or were repealed, the Alien Enemies Act remains in effect today. It was notably used during World War I to intern German Americans and during World War II to detain and deport thousands of Japanese, German, and Italian nationals, alongside the more infamous internment of Japanese Americans (the latter often conflated with Executive Order 9066, which targeted citizens and relied on broader executive power).


In the recent March 2025 deportations to El Salvador, the Trump administration invoked this act to remove 137 alleged gang members, primarily from Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua, arguing their presence constituted a national security threat akin to a predatory incursion. Critics, including legal scholars and civil rights groups, contend this stretches the law beyond its intended scope, as no formal war or invasion by Venezuela exists. The act allows the President to set regulations for identifying and handling alien enemies—here, targeting suspected gang affiliates—but a federal judge’s March 15, 2025, order questioned its application, highlighting due process concerns. The White House defended its use, citing wartime-like authority over border security, though the legal battle continues as of March 18, 2025.
Grok

:dunno:
 
anonymoose said:
The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a U.S. federal law, formally titled part of “An Act Concerning Aliens,” codified under 50 U.S.C. §§ 21–24. It grants the President broad authority during a declared war or when there’s an invasion or predatory incursion by a foreign nation or government to apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove “alien enemies” — individuals who are natives, citizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government involved, and who are 14 years or older and not naturalized U.S. citizens. The law applies only in specific wartime or emergency contexts and requires the President to issue a public proclamation defining the scope of enforcement.


Historically, it’s one of four laws passed as the Alien and Sedition Acts during a tense period of potential conflict with France. Unlike its companion laws, which expired or were repealed, the Alien Enemies Act remains in effect today. It was notably used during World War I to intern German Americans and during World War II to detain and deport thousands of Japanese, German, and Italian nationals, alongside the more infamous internment of Japanese Americans (the latter often conflated with Executive Order 9066, which targeted citizens and relied on broader executive power).


In the recent March 2025 deportations to El Salvador, the Trump administration invoked this act to remove 137 alleged gang members, primarily from Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua, arguing their presence constituted a national security threat akin to a predatory incursion. Critics, including legal scholars and civil rights groups, contend this stretches the law beyond its intended scope, as no formal war or invasion by Venezuela exists. The act allows the President to set regulations for identifying and handling alien enemies—here, targeting suspected gang affiliates—but a federal judge’s March 15, 2025, order questioned its application, highlighting due process concerns. The White House defended its use, citing wartime-like authority over border security, though the legal battle continues as of March 18, 2025.
Grok

:dunno:
Click to expand...
Are we at war? :dunno:
 
These violent illegals who crossed our borders illegally and committed heinous crimes will be deported and the far left loons will have to get used to it.

Or, if the most empathetic object to their deportations, they can take four or five into their homes…which is exactly what they want us to do…accept them into America, our home.

Any takers?

I’ll wait.
 
anonymoose said:
No.
Is there a predatory incursion by a foreign nation?
Click to expand...
AI Overview
1742300446547.png
+1

A "predatory incursion" refers to a hostile or aggressive act, often involving violence or harm, that is intended to seize or exploit something, typically territory or resources.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

  • "Predatory"
    suggests a behavior characteristic of a predator, implying an intent to attack, seize, or exploit something for personal gain.
  • "Incursion"
    means an act of entering a place or territory, often in a hostile or unwelcome way.
  • Combined, "predatory incursion"
    describes a hostile or aggressive act of entering a place or territory with the intent to cause harm or seize something of value.
 
AProudLefty said:
AI Overview
View attachment 46053
+1

A "predatory incursion" refers to a hostile or aggressive act, often involving violence or harm, that is intended to seize or exploit something, typically territory or resources.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

  • "Predatory"
    suggests a behavior characteristic of a predator, implying an intent to attack, seize, or exploit something for personal gain.
  • "Incursion"
    means an act of entering a place or territory, often in a hostile or unwelcome way.
  • Combined, "predatory incursion"
    describes a hostile or aggressive act of entering a place or territory with the intent to cause harm or seize something of value.
Click to expand...
Then you agree with the administration’s policy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top