City workers banned from official travel to Arizona

Yeah. It doesn't really justify racail profiling. There must be an encounter for some other reason before and other criteria must be met before immigration status inquiries can proceed.

Cops see a man who looks hispanic and they can manufacture any encounter they want.

All they've got to claim is they stopped the person for erratic driving...lane change with no signal...making a turn w/no signal.

People don't actually have to be breaking the law to get stopped by the cops.
 
Walking down the street an officer sees you while you happen to be wearing your brown skin today (it just goes so well with my favorite shorts). The officer stops to ask you if you had seen a brown man running this way. He then notices the brown skin you happened to be wearing today and asks you if you have your papers for wearing brown skin in Arizona.

Outright LIE and DISTORTION. The law does not say that, doesn't authorize that, and will not be enforced that way. This is a smoke-screen scare tactic, designed to dovetail with the allegations of racism lobbed at the right. Nothing more.
 
And neither did the people who complained about The dixie chicke treatment for using their American voice.
They were not a government entity, and did not have the force of the government as an employer. You are being incredibly disingenuous with this.
 
Cops see a man who looks hispanic and they can manufacture any encounter they want.

All they've got to claim is they stopped the person for erratic driving...lane change with no signal...making a turn w/no signal.

People don't actually have to be breaking the law to get stopped by the cops.


And finally the truth comes out.
All those who oppose the new AZ law, FEEL that every cop is going to "MANUFACTURE" an excuse to check to see if they are legal.

GEE, I guess they could MANUFACTURE any excuse to stop a car and look for drugs; but I don't see a groundswell to have this law changed in EVERY OTHER FUCKING STATE.

What a bunch of maroons.
 
They were not a government entity, and did not have the force of the government as an employer. You are being incredibly disingenuous with this.


What are you carrying on about? I think Desh's point was that at least this boycott is for something that matters to the lives of individuals, not because the state of Arizona hurt someone's fee-fees.
 
And finally the truth comes out.
All those who oppose the new AZ law, FEEL that every cop is going to "MANUFACTURE" an excuse to check to see if they are legal.

GEE, I guess they could MANUFACTURE any excuse to stop a car and look for drugs; but I don't see a groundswell to have this law changed in EVERY OTHER FUCKING STATE.

What a bunch of maroons.

On second thought, you are right. How can I make that claim??

It's not like I've personally witnessed DOZENS of examples of the police doing JUST THAT...MANUFACTURING a reason for stopping someone.

No, just because I KNOW that police can and do manufacture reasons for stopping drivers every day, that's no reason for me to assume the honest and upstanding law enforcement officers in Az would ever do what their fraternal brothers do ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY...DAY IN...DAY OUT.
 
On second thought, you are right. How can I make that claim??

It's not like I've personally witnessed DOZENS of examples of the police doing JUST THAT...MANUFACTURING a reason for stopping someone.

No, just because I KNOW that police can and do manufacture reasons for stopping drivers every day, that's no reason for me to assume the honest and upstanding law enforcement officers in Az would ever do what their fraternal brothers do ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY...DAY IN...DAY OUT.


Well, I guess that settles it; because you witnessed DOZENS of examples.


OH-WAIT, that would be 12 out of how many THOUSANDS of stops every day, if not every hour.

FAILED ZAP EXAMPLE.
 
What are you carrying on about? I think Desh's point was that at least this boycott is for something that matters to the lives of individuals, not because the state of Arizona hurt someone's fee-fees.
No, her comparison was to the Dixie Chicks and their fan response saying that this City using its official force to do the same thing was something equivalent.

Now, step away slowly from the bad defense, if you touch it again it might go off on you accidentally, let the professionals handle it.
 
No, her comparison was to the Dixie Chicks and their fan response saying that this City using its official force to do the same thing was something equivalent.

Now, step away slowly from the bad defense, if you touch it again it might go off on you accidentally, let the professionals handle it.


I really don't know what you're talking about. The way I read her post, she was defending the boycott of Arizona on the grounds that the Arizona law is (arguably) a violation of civil rights whereas the dumbass boycott of the Dixie Chicks was because they hurt George Bush's fee-fees.

And for some reason you seem to think that the City of San Francisco is somehow doing something wrong. I'd love to hear that argument rather than your asinine oblique references to "official force" and "force of the government as an employer."
 
On second thought, you are right. How can I make that claim??

It's not like I've personally witnessed DOZENS of examples of the police doing JUST THAT...MANUFACTURING a reason for stopping someone.

No, just because I KNOW that police can and do manufacture reasons for stopping drivers every day, that's no reason for me to assume the honest and upstanding law enforcement officers in Az would ever do what their fraternal brothers do ALL ACROSS THIS COUNTRY...DAY IN...DAY OUT.

Oh lookee here...Zappy shrieking like a girl!!!

Who'duh thunk it!!!

Provide proof ... and until then please keep shrieking...you're killin' us over here!

:cof1:

:palm:
 
I'd move thier more quickly if they did.

Hey spinster, do you know the difference between the words "thier" (which is technically incorrectly spelled) and the word "there"? You have apparently some trouble with words that are spelled differently, sound the same and more importantly mean completely different things.
 
Well, I guess that settles it; because you witnessed DOZENS of examples.


OH-WAIT, that would be 12 out of how many THOUSANDS of stops every day, if not every hour.

FAILED ZAP EXAMPLE.

Where did I try and claim that every cop manufactured reasons for stopping someone? You can show me where I made that claim, right?

Just said I'd seen numerous examples of it happening.

Now be the good little peon and go ask Skankasaurus Rex what she wants you to say to me next.

She'd taunt me herself, but the poor, pathetic cow can't stop giving out my personal info, and the board mods have got her under scrutiny.
 
Hey spinster, do you know the difference between the words "thier" (which is technically incorrectly spelled) and the word "there"? You have apparently some trouble with words that are spelled differently, sound the same and more importantly mean completely different things.

Hey, grammar cop...the third grade called, they want their spell checker back.
 
Where did I try and claim that every cop manufactured reasons for stopping someone? You can show me where I made that claim, right?

Just said I'd seen numerous examples of it happening.

Now be the good little peon and go ask Skankasaurus Rex what she wants you to say to me next.

She'd taunt me herself, but the poor, pathetic cow can't stop giving out my personal info, and the board mods have got her under scrutiny.

But unfortunetly; the left would have everyone believe that in Arizona, the cops are going to being just that to anyone that is darker then eggwhite.

What personal information is that, Richard?
 
Hey spinster, do you know the difference between the words "thier" (which is technically incorrectly spelled) and the word "there"? You have apparently some trouble with words that are spelled differently, sound the same and more importantly mean completely different things.

topspin is a big stupid fucker no doubt, but around here nobody likes nit picking.
 
But unfortunetly; the left would have everyone believe that in Arizona, the cops are going to being just that to anyone that is darker then eggwhite.

What personal information is that, Richard?

The left would have EVERYONE believe that about cops in Az?

Well, I don't believe that, so your first statement is a lie right out of the gate.

Can you even provide any evidence of someone on the left doing what you claim?
 
But unfortunetly; the left would have everyone believe that in Arizona, the cops are going to being just that to anyone that is darker then eggwhite.

What personal information is that, Richard?

OH-NO, now zippy is negative repping me, again, and making veiled threats.

And to think, he said that he wasn't concerned aboiut the REP!!
 
Where did I try and claim that every cop manufactured reasons for stopping someone? You can show me where I made that claim, right?

Just said I'd seen numerous examples of it happening.

Now be the good little peon and go ask Skankasaurus Rex what she wants you to say to me next.

She'd taunt me herself, but the poor, pathetic cow can't stop giving out my personal info, and the board mods have got her under scrutiny.

how many fucking times have you ridiculed me for issues with a banned member and here you are whining about the same thing MONTH after MONTH....

you are pathetic hypocrite
 
The left would have EVERYONE believe that about cops in Az?

Well, I don't believe that, so your first statement is a lie right out of the gate.

Can you even provide any evidence of someone on the left doing what you claim?

Is this an admission that you haven't been staying abreast of the discussion??

More's the pity.
 
Back
Top