SmarterthanYou
rebel
It turns out the year the building started was 1998. It was finished in 2001
and I noticed that you haven't retracted your accusation of Bush, admitting you were wrong.........

It turns out the year the building started was 1998. It was finished in 2001
http://www.pogo.org/pogo-files/alerts/contract-oversight/co-lsi-20070525.html
Deepwater Whistleblower Challenges Testimony by Lockheed Martin
May 25, 2007
Michael DeKort, who has helped to expose the Coast Guard Deepwater scandal, issued a letter today challenging testimony by Lockheed Martin before two Subcommittees of the House Homeland Security Committee last week. On a number of issues, Mr. DeKort finds that Lockheed Martin Maritime Systems President Fred Moosally was not entirely accurate or truthful when he testified May 17. Full text of the letter follows.
Nobody approved it to be installed without the basic safety devices required of all rigs. That the robots were sent down to shut off the valve that didn't exist only shows that they were hiding the fact that they knew it wasn't there.It turns out the year the building started was 1998. It was finished in 2001
You are right it does have nothing to do with it.
I blew it by assuming the whistle blower had something to do with this situation when I found it in one of my searches for Deepwater horizon.
I threw it up there to look at in more depth while I looked over other things in the searches.
I was trying to find out who approved this rig for exploration and building.
I now think it was Bush 41 or Reagan.
That to blame this on Obama is insanity.
To pretend that he could do what no one can do and is a major reason we should not be drilling in these situations.
No one knows how to stop these deep water spills which means they are not a safe type of drilling in the first place and should not be done.
Who ever approved this well is more responsible than anyone in the current government.
http://www.politico.com/largevideobox.html?bcpid=15202024001&bclid=1201016315&bctid=82523507001
Yeah, they've been all over this problem! Can you imagine the flack the chimp would have gotten over this disaster and the week and a half of continued spilling? Where are the ecotards crying in thread after thread about big oil? Where are you hypocrites?
It's possible it was GHWB then, but I fail to see why it would matter.It turns out the year the building started was 1998. It was finished in 2001
Dude I never said it was Bush ,I posted information and asked questions that I did not claim to know the answer for.
It turns out that it very well could have been Bush 41 in the end.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/may/03/usa-dickcheney
From the Wall Street Journal:
The oil well spewing crude into the Gulf of Mexico didn't have a remote-control shut-off switch used in two other major oil-producing nations as last-resort protection against underwater spills.
The lack of the device, called an acoustic switch, could amplify concerns over the environmental impact of offshore drilling after the explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon rig last week...
... regulators in two major oil-producing countries, Norway and Brazil, in effect require them. Norway has had acoustic triggers on almost every offshore rig since 1993.
The U.S. considered requiring a remote-controlled shut-off mechanism several years ago, but drilling companies questioned its cost and effectiveness, according to the agency overseeing offshore drilling. The agency, the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service, says it decided the remote device wasn't needed because rigs had other back-up plans to cut off a well.
The U.K., where BP is headquartered, doesn't require the use of acoustic triggers.
As per their posts in this thread, blaming Bush and deflecting. :lol:
they had a dead man switch that is supposed to automatically shut off the oil, it didn't work, thus, it is also highly probable that the acoustic switch would not have been effective. we just don't know what exactly happened at this point.
The manufacturer of the dead mans switch needs to be held accountable.
Their factory should be shut down, all it's workers fired, the assets of the company sold off (along with the assests of who ever inspected the switch before it left the factory), and the President of the company and the inspector should go to jail.
OR we could wait for the reports to come in and then make decisions based on facts and not guesses.
hence why i said this:
we just don't know what exactly happened at this point.
go back to yelling out G34, I45
You are so full of stupidity, as of late, that you aren't even able to see that what I posted was in support of what you were saying.
I worded it the way I did, to try and show the doomsayers how they were acting.
I'll make sure that I don't support you in the future and only slam what I THINK you said and not what you actually posted.
You've turned into a fucking dumbass.![]()