HOW TO TELL IF JESUS WAS A BLACK MAN.....

[AProudLefty]

Yet the Bible says that the original man,...Adam, was Ruddy in description and that Adam was made in Gods own image.

Ruddy= pinkish reddish skin, reddish from sun, or hard work/exertion.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.........

A redneck?

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

View attachment 48568In his short life hear on earth, he cured illnesses, he made the cripple walk again, he raised 3 people from the dead, he fed an entire village with just one fish, he walked on water, he performed miracle after miracle and still he wasn't believed....why? BECAUSE HE WAS A BLACK MAN. Pay attention AMERIKKKA!!

Get your delusions treated. Why don't the blacks go to work on miracles in Africa? Or any shithole "hood" here in democrat cities?

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

^^^^^ The epitome of a nutter. Guno calling others "Pasty faced " when the man who fathered him had much lighter skin than I do!
Self hatred anyone?

Goono can't help itself. Inferiority drives a person to dark places. Some even pretend to be Jews.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

 

[Walt]

There is no physical description of Christ in the Bible. I think it is so please will listen to what he said rather than care about how he looked.

Revelations 1:14-1:16 talks about Jesus having wooly hair, and dark skin. That starts sounding Black, but I doubt he was what we would consider Black.

Early Jews would look like Turkic tribes , as Abraham was from what is now Turkey.

That is just stupid. The Turks invaded Turkey within recorded history. There were no Turks in Turkey 2,000 years ago, much less thousands of years before that. So even if Abraham were from Turkey, which he was not, he would not have to look like later inhabitance of Turkey.

Abraham came from Ur Kasdim, in Mesopotamia, which would today be Southern Iraq. Or at least that is the story.

Ask actual Jews if Jesus was black,....they will reply like I did by saying NOPE.

Let's try it:
I answer, I really do not care, but I suppose that back then they did not define people as "Black" like we do today. He definitely was darker than he is displayed in European art. He was not completely "white."

 

[EdwinA]

If the middle east consisted mostly of white folk, it would be a trailor park haven by now with ....a bunch of left behind redneck losers roaming around in dust waiting on Pyramid jobs to return....LOL

Nearly all of them are Indo-European people.

That is just stupid. The Turks invaded Turkey within recorded history. There were no Turks in Turkey 2,000 years ago, much less thousands of years before that. So even if Abraham were from Turkey, which he was not, he would not have to look like later inhabitance of Turkey.

Who said they were Turks, dumbass? You think there were no people in Turkey until the Turks, idiot? Call them Anatolian if it makes you feel better, moron.

Abraham came from Ur Kasdim, in Mesopotamia, which would today be Southern Iraq. Or at least that is the story.

Not according to his travel in the Bible. But you've never read it o you wouldn't know, you're just a parrot babbling whatever you're told.

Why do scholars think Abraham came from Ur in Mesopotamia?

Most scholars still think that Abraham came from Ur in southern Mesopotamia / Sumer. This seems strange for a number of reasons, including: -The Ur in Mesopotamia is NOT beyond (East of) the Euphra...

hermeneutics.stackexchange.com

In any case the Chaldeans pre-dated Babylonians, and came from the western Levant, i.e. they were probably Canaanites.

Who were the Canaanites? New insight from 73 ancient genomes

The people who lived in the area known as the Southern Levant -- which is now recognized as Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, Lebanon, and parts of Syria -- during the Bronze Age (circa 3500-1150 BCE) are referred to in ancient biblical texts as the Canaanites. Now, researchers have new...

www.sciencedaily.com

"Rather, we observe evidence for the movement of people over long periods of time from the northeast of the Ancient Near East, including modern Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, into the Southern Levant region.


"The Canaanites, albeit living in different city-states, were culturally and genetically similar," he adds. "In addition, this region has witnessed many later population movements, with people coming from the northeast, from the south, and from the northwest."

They were never 'black', they came from the same regions as the other Indo-Europeans did, same as Persians. Linguistics archeology also traces the languages back to the Caucasus regions, likely from proto-Kurgan tribes, and some Indo-European Aryan inter-marriages, same peoples who migrated into northern India very early in history.

Dumbasses like Walt are too stupid to even do basic research before running round parroting idiot crap. They're incapable of being educated.

Turkic peoples - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Turkic peoples are a collection of diverse ethnic groups of West, Central, East, and North Asia as well as parts of Europe, who speak Turkic languages.

According to historians and linguists, the Proto-Turkic language originated in Central-East Asia, potentially in the Altai-Sayan region, Mongolia or Tuva. Initially, Proto-Turkic speakers were potentially both hunter-gatherers and farmers; they later became nomadic pastoralists.< Early and medieval Turkic groups exhibited a wide range of both East Asian and West-Eurasian physical appearances and genetic origins, in part through long-term contact with neighboring peoples such as Iranic, Mongolic, Tocharian, Uralic and Yeniseian peoples.<

Many vastly differing ethnic groups have throughout history become part of the Turkic peoples through language shift, acculturation, conquest, intermixing, adoption, and religious conversion. Nevertheless, Turkic peoples share, to varying degrees, non-linguistic characteristics like cultural traits, ancestry from a common gene pool, and historical experiences. Some of the most notable modern Turkic ethnic groups include the Altai people, Azerbaijanis, Chuvash people, Gagauz people, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz people, Turkmens, Turkish people, Tuvans, Uyghurs, Uzbeks, and Yakuts.

Now, watch as almost nobody reads the links and instead ignore them in favor of posting some more idiot rubbish,and note again why I rarely bother with wasting time posting them due to the generally moronic 'culture' of leftists and deviants.

 

[Kurmugeon]

Love and Forgiveness... that is the core of Jesus.

It doesn't matter in the slightest what the skin-tone of any person, Jesus, or a random lay person, or a Pope, is... when it comes to their acceptance of Love and Forgiveness.

How would the amount of pigment in their skin, impact their ability to Love and Forgive?

The Lefties once again, and just stirring up un-needed and un-welcome Racial Division and Strife.

I reject the focus on Skin-tone, in the same way I reject the temptations of Satan.

I don't need or want your division.

-

 

[EdwinA]

The Lefties once again, and just stirring up un-needed and un-welcome Racial Division and Strife.

Of course; the OP isn't black, though, just another version of Guno the fake Jew.

 

[Kurmugeon]

Of course; the OP isn't black, though, just another version of Guno the fake Jew.

Pushing Division is profitable, yet ugly and destructive.

Can't we grow up?

-

 

[Dachshund]

View attachment 48568In his short life hear on earth, he cured illnesses, he made the cripple walk again, he raised 3 people from the dead, he fed an entire village with just one fish, he walked on water, he performed miracle after miracle and still he wasn't believed....why? BECAUSE HE WAS A BLACK MAN. Pay attention AMERIKKKA!!

If you mean Black in the sense of African-American Black negros, I don't think Jesus was Black. America's current Black African population are descended from the African slaves who were taken from the West-Central region of the Sub-Saharan African continent, and shipped to North America by slave traders 17th and 18th centuries.

When Jesus was cruising around here on Earth (in the Holy Land), 2000 years ago, if he was Black,(in the African-American sense), he was logically born to Black negro parents in Sub-Saharan Africe, somewhere in the Congo basin.


That means that Black Jesus would have the genetic make-up of his Black negro parents, and that while he was being brought up he would have acquired the tribal culture of the region in which he was born.


That culture would not have born any resemblance to the practices of Christianity. Basically it would have been a very primitive and brutal culture, one where: cannibalism was a commonplace, the dominant "religion" would have been, "Vedan", which is the principle root stock of religion called "Voo - Doo". The young "Black Jesus" would have grown up watching cannibal feasts and ceremonial sexual orgies going down (where everyone in the village was poking everyone else - and any unfortunate stray cats and dogs - in every available hole). It would also be customary to poop in public - anywhere you liked in the village, and wipe you ass with your fingers (just like in San Francisco today !!). None of this behaviour has anything remotely Christian about it. Right ?


So if Jesus of Nazareth was in fact a Black man, then the content of the Gospels would be very different to what they have always been. If Black Jesus left the African Congo as a young adult and travelled Northwards up to the Holy Land, he would not have suddenly changed from a hairy-assed, oversexed, cannibal savage, into a serene preacher of : "charity, forgiveness, , peace, love and understanding" etc; WOULD HE?


Dachshund Dawg


DACHSHUND LIVES MATTER !!

 

[Walt]

Nearly all of them are Indo-European people.

By definition, the Jews, Egyptians, Babylonians, Mesopotamians, Arabs, etc. were not Indo-European people. The Indo-Europeans spread in the areas that Middle Eastern people did not want. They were a fringe people.

You think there were no people in Turkey until the Turks, idiot?

Why would Abraham look like the Turks, if the Turks were not in Turkey? Besides, Abraham would not be from Turkey at all.

Not according to his travel in the Bible.

The Bible is very particular that Abraham came from Ur Kasdim, Mesopotamia, NOT TURKEY!!!

Even your own links agree with me.

 

[EdwinA]

By definition, the Jews, Egyptians, Babylonians, Mesopotamians, Arabs, etc. were not Indo-European people. The Indo-Europeans spread in the areas that Middle Eastern people did not want. They were a fringe people.


Why would Abraham look like the Turks, if the Turks were not in Turkey? Besides, Abraham would not be from Turkey at all.


The Bible is very particular that Abraham came from Ur Kasdim, Mesopotamia, NOT TURKEY!!!

Even your own links agree with me.

Yes, keep being a moron. We need the laughs.