GLOBAL WARMING -- Everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else!!!!!!

[Into the Night]

I just did some more interesting Google searches:

1) list of countries warming below global average This link, in the very convenient "AI overview" section at the top, informs me that Sweden is one of the countries that is warming below the global average. It tells me that this is due to their strict adherence to the required rituals of the Global Warming faith.

2) Sweden warming twice as fast as This link, in the very convenient "AI overview" section at the top, informs me that Sweden is NOT warming below the global average, but is rather actually warming twice as fast as the global average. Sooooooo which "AI overview" is the correct one? ... or maybe they're BOTH wrong??

Then there's THIS little nugget...

3) list of countries warming below the global average This link uses the exact same wording as link #1, except I added in the word "the" between the words 'below' and 'global'. Here, within the very convenient "AI overview" section, I am informed that it is "difficult" to provide a definitive list of countries warming below the global average.

I wonder if that is because there supposedly AREN'T any countries that are warming below the global average... because every country is supposedly warming TWICE AS FAST AS the global average... because that's the nonsensical kind of BS that the Global Warming faith loves to preach in order to fear monger the gullible masses...

Indeed it is!

It is not, of course, possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, or a nation, or a State, or even a city, not with the number of thermometers available in any of these locations.

 

[Into the Night]

YOu guys are nothing if not masters of post hoc justification to cover your own limitations. I'll give you that.

Random phrase. No apparent coherency.

 

[AProudLefty]

Indeed it is!

It is not, of course, possible to measure the temperature of the Earth, or a nation, or a State, or even a city, not with the number of thermometers available in any of these locations.

It is possible to measure the average temperatures. Meteorologists do it all the time.

 

[gfm7175]

It is possible to measure the average temperatures. Meteorologists do it all the time.

You very clearly have no idea what an average is (or even what temperature is).

 

[Into the Night]

You should feel ashamed.

Random phrase. No apparent coherency.

 

[Into the Night]

Your point has already been taken. You're beating a dead horse.

Cliche fallacy. Random phrase. No apparent coherency.

 

[Into the Night]

Yo don't need an understanding of ay

"There is no such thing as incorrectly applying science that always applies. "

So, I could use the referenced radiance equation to calculate how long it would take two trains to meet on a train track if one left New York traveling west at 58 mph and the other train left San Diego traveling east at 77 mph?

I'm quite sure someone, with enough information, could calculate how much air is released from a balloon, and how quickly it's released, if you opened the valve. If you calculated that correctly, that doesn't mean you'd be correct if you tried to use the released air equation to determine the distance from Mars to Earth.

You aren't applying anything. You are just spewing random shit. Science is not random shit.

 

[Into the Night]

It is highly doubtful that anyone has said anything like that. But thanks for proving ONCE AGAIN you can't follow through with your Stefan-Boltzmann claims.



I've actually done calculations with S-B. Unlike you I can work a math problem. LOL

You deny the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

The APA begs to Differ. But I'm sure YOU are the authority. LOL. Rando alert!



Good luck, grampa! Keep shoutin' at those kids to keep their soccer balls off your lawn.

You lose to history. Good job being a dinosaur.





LOL. YOU, dismissed

Attempted justification of redefinition fallacies. Go learn English.

 

[Bai Lan]

I confess that I've never paid much attention to the AGW controversy, except to note that the overwhelming majority of climatologists say there is evidence of global warming, and at least part of it could be anthropogenic.

Do your guys say there is no global warming? Or if there is, that none of it is man-made, so there's nothing we can do about it? And what makes them so sure they're right?

In 2014 an open letter from the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry called on the media to stop using the term "skepticism" when referring to climate change denial. They contrasted scientific skepticism—which is "foundational to the scientific method"—with denial—"the a priori rejection of ideas without objective consideration". They said: "Not all individuals who call themselves climate change skeptics are deniers. But virtually all deniers have falsely branded themselves as skeptics. By perpetuating this misnomer, journalists have granted undeserved credibility to those who reject science and scientific inquiry."

Got a link to what the overwhelming majority of climatologists think?

 

[Into the Night]

Again... if you had A N Y intellectual curiosity, you could have found this on your own:

Factors influencing regional warming rates:

What 'regional warming rates'?????????

• Latitude:
  Higher latitudes (closer to the poles) experience greater temperature fluctuations and warming rates due to the angle of sunlight and other factors.

What 'warming rate'?????

• Altitude:
  Higher altitudes tend to be cooler than lower altitudes, and the rate of warming may be lower in mountainous regions.

What 'rate of warming'??????

• Ocean proximity:
  Ocean currents and the influence of the ocean can moderate temperature changes in coastal regions, leading to slower warming rates compared to land areas further inland.

What 'warming rates'?????

• Greenhouse gas emissions:
  Countries with higher greenhouse gas emissions will tend to experience more warming than those with lower emissions.

What 'warming'??????

No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth or any region, Void. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics. You cannot create energy out of nothing.

Specific examples:

• European land:
  European land temperatures have increased faster than the global average, indicating a higher rate of warming in Europe.

What 'rate of warming'??????

It is not possible to measure the temperature or the temperature of Europe.

• Land areas:
  Land areas generally warm faster than oceans, and some land areas may experience warming rates below the average due to factors like altitude or ocean proximity.

What 'warming'??????

• Polar regions:
  Polar regions experience significantly higher rates of warming than the global average.

What 'warming'????????

Argument from randU fallacies. Buzzword fallacies.

 

[Into the Night]

@ZenMode - fix your post and repost it. If I hit reply, nothing gets quoted.

It's a repetition. He didn't post anything.

 

[Into the Night]

Why do I think your points are meaningless? Because you were too much of a pussy to even defend your claims about Stefan-Boltzmann but ran away like a little worm.



The only reason anyone responds to your posts is so you'll say something even MORE stupid or show yourself to be a bigger puss than you already are.

You're hilarious!

RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

So, do you see how it's possible to incorrectly apply science?

And, have you come up with an answer to these questions regarding Trusting the Science.

Right. In general do I trust my doctor, or a doctor, or do I trust "the science" and leave a doctor out of it?

Right, so how do I apply your theory of "trust the science" in real life?

Random statements are not science, Void.
Science is not a doctor.
Science is not a trust.

 

[Into the Night]

It is possible to measure the average temperatures. Meteorologists do it all the time.

Now you are denying the 0th law of thermodynamics and statistical mathematics again.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.

 

[Into the Night]

Got a link to what the overwhelming majority of climatologists think?

Who cares? Climate has no temperature.

 

[AProudLefty]

You very clearly have no idea what an average is (or even what temperature is).

It's a measure of the average kinetic energy.

 

[ZenMode]

Random statements are not science, Void.
Science is not a doctor.
Science is not a trust.

Stop being dumb.

 

[ZenMode]

What 'regional warming rates'?????????

The rate based on temperature measurements.

What 'warming rate'?????

The rate based on temperature measurements.

What 'rate of warming'??????

The rate based on temperature measurements.

What 'warming rates'?????

The rate based on temperature measurements.

What 'warming'??????

The amount based on temperature measurements.

No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth or any region, Void. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics. You cannot create energy out of nothing.

Opinion stated as fact.

You continue to show your ignorance on the topic of climate change.

What 'rate of warming'??????

The rate based on temperature measurements.

It is not possible to measure the temperature or the temperature of Europe.

Opinion stated as fact.

What 'warming'??????

The rate based on temperature measurements.

What 'warming'????????

The rate based on temperature measurements.
Argument from randU fallacies. Buzzword fallacies.

Dumb. Void.

 

[IBDaMann]

It's a measure of the average kinetic energy.

Nope. The correct answer is that you don't know what temperature is. If I pick up a resting baseball and throw it at 50 mph, thus increasing it's average kinetic energy, you strangely believe that its temperature has increased. Stupid.

Thermal energy is responsible for temperature, not kinetic energy.