Court Docs Reveal Ex-Husband of MS-13 Member’s Wife Fears for His Children’s Lives — Warned Authorities She’s Dating a “Gang Member”

The NAMBLAcrat party is pretty desperate for a toe-hold on a decent point to be so readily citable for championing obvious illegal immigrant criminals as valuable human beings.

In the end it's safe to say that no one would vote for a hoard of criminals like the NAMBLAcrat party if there wasn't a racist wedge issue they could push up against their constituents heads.

NAMBLAcrats are why racism can't end.GlRkP4MXkAArvgx.jpegGe3pXxsXAAAWKJT.jpegGeXfHBdW0AA6ry0.jpeg
 
Wrong

AI Overview
View attachment 49388
View attachment 49389
+6

Bypassing a port of entry is generally a felony under federal law, specifically 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) and § 1326(a). Specifically, entering or attempting to enter the United States at a location other than a designated port of entry, or eluding inspection at a port of entry, can result in a felony charge.


Elaboration:
  • Federal Law:
    Bypassing a port of entry is a violation of federal law, specifically 8 U.S.C. § 1325, which outlines criminal offenses related to improper entry.
Personally, I don't want these morons to ever stop fighting for Kilmar. I hope there are armies of dumbasses like @AProudLefty out there that won't let this go. Republicans could ride this all the way to the midterms as crazy as that seems. That said, there are rumors Hakeem has been telling his herd of whack-jobs to lay off, I hope they're not true.
 

Evidence of MS-13 gang members amassing in Chicago and trump isn't sending ICE to deport them...​


evidence-of-ms-13-gang-members-amassing-in-chicago-and-v0-2p25tzn1nfve1.jpeg
Mind projection fallacy. Just because you think they're gang members doesn't make it so. You've created a non sequitur as a result.

In Abrego Garcia's case, the Bull's attire is only one of many indicators that he is an MS 13 member, and it isn't a strong one. What you want to do is ignore all the other evidence, focus on one aspect (the Bull's attire), and then dismiss the entirety as irrelevant (trivial objections / nit picking fallacy)
 
Mind projection fallacy. Just because you think they're gang members doesn't make it so. You've created a non sequitur as a result.

In Abrego Garcia's case, the Bull's attire is only one of many indicators that he is an MS 13 member, and it isn't a strong one. What you want to do is ignore all the other evidence, focus on one aspect (the Bull's attire), and then dismiss the entirety as irrelevant (trivial objections / nit picking fallacy)
Fox news said they were. Are you saying Fox news lies?
 
Provide the link then.

Jesse Watters says ‘everyone knows’ that wearing a Chicago Bulls hat ‘means you’re MS-13’​

‘If you’re a Latin American illegal alien in Maryland, you don’t accidentally wear Chicago Bulls gear and hang around with high-ranking gangsters from MS-13,’ Jesse Watters declared on Tuesday night

 
Kilmar Abrego Garcia was accused of being a gang member in 2018 court papers, The Post can reveal — as the fight continues over whether the deported illegal immigrant dad was a part of MS-13.

Abrego Garcia’s wife’s ex made the claim when he filed documents seeking an emergency court hearing on the custody of the couple’s two children.


“She is dating a gang member,” Jennifer Vasquez Sura’s ex, Edwin Trejo Ramos alleged in the petition filed in Prince George’s County Circuit Court in Maryland.

Asking Kimar's wife to speak on his behalf is like the man on the street interviews CNN did in Iraq before the war. Some poor bastard would find himself on CNN saying that America should stay away and Saddam is a fair and just leader. CNN would act like they could speak freely and honestly, lol.

This poor girl knows what will happen if she tells the truth about Kilmar, but Kilmar lovers don't give a shit about her. Remember when some libtard asked her if she was scared of Kilmar, she took a long pause and said "he's alive".......and the Mr. Libtard said he wouldn't push her on that question. She's definitely scared for herself and her children. Democrats are really sick.
 

Jesse Watters says ‘everyone knows’ that wearing a Chicago Bulls hat ‘means you’re MS-13’​

‘If you’re a Latin American illegal alien in Maryland, you don’t accidentally wear Chicago Bulls gear and hang around with high-ranking gangsters from MS-13,’ Jesse Watters declared on Tuesday night​

This is your big proof? A talking head on FOX foisting his opinion? How stupid are you?
 
What? And one that has a due process that was given him with a final order of deportation as the verdict. Yes, another judge gave him a stay on its execution to El Salvador because he was afraid a rival gang would see him and off him because of his MS 13 affiliation / membership.
Which pretty well condemn the guy by the court's opinion that he's an ms13 member, thusly the stay can be ignored as partisan hackery by an office with jurisdiction to ignore it under national security interest jurisdiction. "No crime that benefits the nation can be considered a crime" and no one has a higher jurisdiction do do it than the office that holds the highest security clearance.

Not even the supreme court has jurisdiction to overrule the correct use of powers it wasn't even created to have.

With no citizen to protect and thusly no jurisdiction to overrule, there's no compelling interest to intervene. The court's jealousy of its powers do not extend far enough to impede the interests of the people it serves for the benefit of someone who isn't even a legal constituent.
 
Last edited:
What you can't admit that its wrong and that fox news lies?
That Waters has some opinion doesn't make it a "lie." You simply have no concept of human thought processes or something. For you, anything that someone says that is contrary to your views is to be vilified, smeared, and attacked, rather than discussed with reason and objectivity.

What Waters said was a sweeping generality (Dicto Simpliciter) fallacy. That doesn't make it "a lie." You neither know, nor care, what the difference is. You simply want to attack anyone that disagrees with you.


sweeping-generalization-fallacy-l.jpg
 
That Waters has some opinion doesn't make it a "lie." You simply have no concept of human thought processes or something. For you, anything that someone says that is contrary to your views is to be vilified, smeared, and attacked, rather than discussed with reason and objectivity.

What Waters said was a sweeping generality (Dicto Simpliciter) fallacy. That doesn't make it "a lie." You neither know, nor care, what the difference is. You simply want to attack anyone that disagrees with you.


sweeping-generalization-fallacy-l.jpg
So you are saying the previous people who said they love Jessie are idiots for watching and believing that moron?
 
Back
Top