Yep he left his loaded service weapon in a Visitor's restroom. Talk about incompetent. What if a child had found it.
Now We Need To Revisit Lt. Michael Byrd
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
ZenMode
Well-known member
Seven words in and you're already lying.
What's the point in reading any further? You clearly aren't interested in an honest conversation.
Ashli Babbit in the Capitol for jumping vertically. Democrats were united in high-fiving Byrd for wasting a Trump supporter and quickly absolved him of all wrongdoing ... because, after all, Ashli Babbit was a Trump supporter. Democrats argued that Byrd was rightfully "frightened for his life" given all the after-the-fact hysteria that Democrats generated in order to bury Trump.
Enter SCOTUS. In a unanimous 9-0 landmark decision Barnes v. Felix less than two weeks ago (15 May 2025), the Supreme Court declared that it is not sufficient for a police officer to claim that he was in "fear for his life or the lives of others" when using deadly force. An objectively clear threat must exist such that it is determined that any rational, reasonable police officer in that situation would have also used deadly force. Given that the unarmed and peaceful Ashli Babbit's small vertical leap in a public building did not objectively obligate the use of deadly force, the cowardly Lt. Byrd needs to be arraigned for the blatant murder that he committed.
Last edited:
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Show me Ashli Babbit violence.
There is no point. You have always been committed to dishonesty.
Projection.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
The mob.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
What mob?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
... and accountants don't have to do their taxes.
ZenMode
Well-known member
She was the female smashing in a window and trying to crawl in to get to the area where Congressman were:
Your propaganda does not show her smashing the window. She did try and crawl through, being extremely small she was one of the few who could fit. Furthering the fact that she was no threat to Byrd when he summarily executed her.
ZenMode
Well-known member
What is or isn't a threat is subjective.
If you were to wake up in the middle of the night to an angry female smashing in your window, trying to get into your house, wearing a backpack with unknown contents and refusing to stop when told to stop, I suspect you would see that as a threat to those inside your house.
Not according to the SCOTUS.
The execution was politically motivated. No one was in fear for their life.
ZenMode
Well-known member
I don't know how SCOTUS or any other person can intelligently speak for the feelings of everyone inside the Capitol.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I just have to tell you that you are among the shittiest people on the planet. You are always dishonest, and you lie to support criminals. I can't think of a single post in which you have been honest, and now I realize that you just aren't a part of humanity.
1. Smashing a window is not violently attacking anyone
2. Ashli Babbit didn't smash any windows.
Ashli Babbit was shot in the act of jumping vertically. Movement is not violence and does not warrant an extrajudicial death sentence.
You really are shitty. Fuck you. Obviously you think that pretending to be inhumane will make up for your scientific illiteracy, your mathematical incompetence and your logical ineptitude.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I don't know how any scientifically illiterate person can intelligently speak for the "general consensus" of everyone in the "scientific community."
ZenMode
Well-known member
If you were to wake up in the middle of the night to an angry female smashing in your window, trying to get into your house, wearing a backpack with unknown contents and refusing to stop when told to stop, I suspect you would see that as a threat to those inside your house.