Israel would’ve never Started this war at Biden still been president!

Well then use your words as there is a clear split in the Magats now.

Are you in the @Earl camp who is aligned with others on this site and on the Ted Cruise, Marco Rubio, side of saying if another country is doing something the US does not like or agree with then the US needs to put on their World Cop hat and stop them directly or thru proxies which leads to situations like this ...

"President Trump announces the United States has “complete and total control of the skies over Iran.”...​


Or are you in the Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon camp that says America First and to stay out of foreign conflicts and focus on things at home.
Iran with nukes is a bit more than another country doing something the US does not like or agree with.

“Death to Israel, death to America.”

Get a clue.
 
Iran with nukes is a bit more than another country doing something the US does not like or agree with.

“Death to Israel, death to America.”

Get a clue.
So by 'a bit more' what you are saying is you are ok and want the US to be the world's police man as long as you agree a Country the US will attack or go to war with is "doing a bit more" then you think they should be doing.

Do you agree with that definition of your position?

Do you also agree that you will not be the only person in the US (or world) who gets to decide what is acceptable in a 'bit more' and people who are not you might think 'chemical weapons potential' or 'extreme cyber attack potential' are also a 'bit more' and thus the US can and should go to war or attack over those too?

Or are you dumb enough to believe that 'only what i think is a "bit more" should allow the US to go to war or attack but not what others think'.
 
So by 'a bit more' what you are saying is you are ok and want the US to be the world's police man as long as you agree a Country the US will attack or go to war with is "doing a bit more" then you think they should be doing.

Do you agree with that definition of your position?

Do you also agree that you will not be the only person in the US (or world) who gets to decide what is acceptable in a 'bit more' and people who are not you might think 'chemical weapons potential' or 'extreme cyber attack potential' are also a 'bit more' and thus the US can and should go to war or attack over those too?

Or are you dumb enough to believe that 'only what i think is a "bit more" should allow the US to go to war or attack but not what others think'.

You truly are an incredibly boring old fart.
 
Back
Top