Early assessments, Nuclear program not destroyed.

Earl said:
If they try to rebuild, more B-2’s.
Click to expand...
The Iranians are patient. They play the long game. Waiting 3.5 years is nothing to them. In the meantime, they can work on their rocket programs. Allegedly to launch "satellites for peaceful purposes".

Would Trump bomb Iran for making a rocket to launch communications satellites? No. That would ruin his Peace Prize ambitions.
 
Nordberg said:
Unaware of that and so much more. This mess was caused by Trump's need to exaggerate and lie. Then he gets furious when someone dares to question him. If he were an adult and said we did severe damage to Iran's nuke facilities, then the reaction would also have been more muted. Trump cannot pretend to be an adult. He reeks of spoiled brat looking for a confrontation. Trump obliterates nuance and reason.
Click to expand...
Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism, was nearing weapon’s grade enrichment.

“Death to Israel, death to America. From the river to the sea”

The Brave B-2 pilots, including a female pilot, executed a complex mission involving multiple in-flight refueling, multiple support personnel, and then delivered their payload in ventilation openings.

No proof of lying by Leavitt?

I thought so, Nordy.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
They shouldn't get the chance. Bombing should last weeks upon weeks with every potential site cratered into a moonscape. Even then, it might not work.
Click to expand...
Iran has been neutered…for a period of time to be determined.

Since President Trump has stated that “there are many targets in Iran,” I would expect the next round of strikes, if necessary, to include refineries. That would put Iran back to the Stone Age.
 
Earl said:
Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism, was nearing weapon’s grade enrichment.

“Death to Israel, death to America. From the river to the sea”

The Brave B-2 pilots, including a female pilot, executed a complex mission involving multiple in-flight refueling, multiple support personnel, and then delivered their payload in ventilation openings.

No proof of lying by Leavitt?

I thought so, Nordy.
Click to expand...
Iran was at 60 percent for a long time. You goofy lying rightys claim it only had use in bombs. That is not true. Leacvitt lies for Trump. That is her job.
Yeah, they flew bombs a long way to drop them on a nation we are not at war with. They should have refused the mission.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
And that right there explains why this whole cricus was unnecessary. The Clown-in-Chief nixed that treaty over his jealousy of Obama. And now people have died because of it, Our people in the ME are now in grave danger because of it. But the MAGATs are all "Fuck yeah Murica! Bomb! Bomb! Bomb!"
Click to expand...
At least you admit that Obama was giving money to Iran.
 
Grokmaster said:
I know...hence my post.

Totally wrong, per usual.

Trump got a hero's welcome at NATO summit; try to keep up. Or keep cheerleading criminal's nd terrorists.
Click to expand...
Not totally wrong...it IS excruciating for her to watch Trump succeed.
But, that's HER problem.

It does look like Trump was able to bring NATO together rather quickly. This I'm glad to see. Of course, time will tell if they actually follow through with their promises. The word of nations like these don't mean much more than spit anymore.
 
Earl said:
Nordy is too naive to understand that Iran would have used the nukes that they were developing, to bomb Israel and his city.

Why was Iran hiding their enrichment labs under a mountain and refused inspections?
Click to expand...
you have no integrity. Even "Nordy" would admit a typo and not gas light people due to fragility
 
Nordberg said:
Iran was at 60 percent for a long time.
Click to expand...
So they should've been bombed.
Nordberg said:
You goofy lying rightys claim it only had use in bombs.
Click to expand...
It's only use is in bombs.
Lionfish said:
The "messenger" you are relying on is a biased buffoon. If you had given it the 24 hour rule, you would not have embarrassed yourself again.
Click to expand...
The "messenger" the Democrats are using is CNN, which made up the whole thing.
And of course, the NYT picked it up and echoed this particular piece of fiction.
 
Nordberg said:
Iran was at 60 percent for a long time. You goofy lying rightys claim it only had use in bombs. That is not true. Leacvitt lies for Trump. That is her job.
Yeah, they flew bombs a long way to drop them on a nation we are not at war with. They should have refused the mission.
Click to expand...
Second time, Nordy…post her lies with links that prove she lied.

Again, I’ll wait.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I understand. Same here, and same with $arah Palin. If you could get past her screechy voice and fake aw shucks accent,, the word salads she coughed out were almost as incomprehensible as Trump's. I've never understood why some ppl would vote for -- and worship -- someone who gives every impression of being unintelligent, irrational, and/or uneducated. I want leaders who are smarter, more experienced, and hopefully much wiser than I am.
Click to expand...
You can't blame Kamala's problem on Sarah Palin or Trump, Phanty.
 
Nomad said:
As I suggested earlier, they might have been looking to stockpile in the event that someday the world geopolitical situation changed in such a way as they determined they needed nukes for their own security.

The point remains that at 60% enrichment, they have no nuclear weapons and were likely not as close as is being suggested, making the orange idiot's grandstanding play unnecessary.

Had he not shredded the treaty they had signed, we'd have inspectors in their facilities watching and monitoring them.
Click to expand...
Bullshit. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top