You had one who was nominated and did a horrible job trying to convince voters she wasn't a corrupt criminal hack, and another who didn't garner a single vote, but was SELECTED.We had two.
Only the dumbest among us think that is what winning is.

You had one who was nominated and did a horrible job trying to convince voters she wasn't a corrupt criminal hack, and another who didn't garner a single vote, but was SELECTED.We had two.
When he sees words like "good", "honest" and "competent" his brain turns off.No, we did not...
. LOL...he's just trying to win the JPP TOP Troll award...When he sees words like "good", "honest" and "competent" his brain turns off.![]()
Yes to laughter and your simple mindedness.Triggered?
You believe? Thats meaningless. They voted for the talking pig in a pant suit didn't they? She objectively was a far better candidate than the loser Kamal that you guys put even though your own party rejected her. I guess the Democrat party isnt ready for a woman president huh?I believe there is a large enough block of people who, subconsciously or not would not vote for a woman, that it provides a statistically large enough group that makes a female candidate less likely to win.
Thats all that matters in elections EinsteinNot the American people, the American voters.
Jarhead is prolific, and nothing compared to ADumbLefty and DumbUncle.. LOL...he's just trying to win the JPP TOP Troll award...
He's too far behind for that to ever happen, though....
Who do you think was sharp? Trump cannot get 50 percent and if he ran now, he would be buried. He is a joke to the world and cannot handle an economy, nor can he learn.They even removed a man and hand picked a woman...so the idiots thought a man that was sharp as a tack couldn't beat him
voters are what count and your girls shit the bedNot the American people, the American voters.
says who?Women have more prejudices to overcome in a presidential election than men. He can only win when his opponent has such a handicap.
It makes sense, because eventually they will overcome the prejudice and this helps.says who?
what are those prejudices?
And if that is true and your side really wants to win elections, then does it make sense for your side to keep putting them out there to guarantee a loss? Doesn't seem to make sense does it? Is your party trying to lose on purpose Veruca?
Agreed, but you cant say the "American people" when so many failed to vote.Thats all that matters in elections Einstein
I contend he won in 2020, so you're wrong!Against a man!
You are a delusional conspiracy theorist.I contend he won in 2020, so you're wrong!![]()
Your point?Against a man!
^^ Jarod projecting his own "men are superior" viewpoint onto "Trumppers".No, I’m saying Trumppers think they are.
SAID AGAIN:Both times they were clearly the better candidate
Did Demonkkkrats ever choose to run a male candidate against Trump?Mano a Mano, TACO loses every time!