So do I, I followed the directions to disable it but when it said to click on disable, there was no disable to click on.I hate auto correct
Womens' sports: looks like common sense is finally reemerging
- Thread starter serendipity
- Start date
Nope. That tells you they don't think it's a federal issue. That doesn't address the question I asked you.
"Most Democrats — around 7 in 10 — oppose allowing transgender female athletes to participate in women’s sports, according to a January New York Times/Ipsos poll."
Newsom opposes trans athletes in women's sports, splitting with progressives
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, used the inaugural episode of his new podcast to break from progressives by speaking out against allowing transgender women and girls to compete in female sports.
www.nbcbayarea.com
Nope, it tells you that Senate Democrats have blocked Republican-led bills that aimed to ban transgender athletes from women's sports in federally funded schools..Nope. That tells you they don't think it's a federal issue. That doesn't address the question I asked you.
"Most Democrats — around 7 in 10 — oppose allowing transgender female athletes to participate in women’s sports, according to a January New York Times/Ipsos poll."
Newsom opposes trans athletes in women's sports, splitting with progressives
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, used the inaugural episode of his new podcast to break from progressives by speaking out against allowing transgender women and girls to compete in female sports.
It appears to be confusing you.
It’s is a federal issue. The Democrats used that as an excuse to not support women in sports and to support trans freaks in women’s sports.
This will not be forgotten and will be in Republic ads next election.
Yes, Title IX is a federal law. It's formally known as Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. This law prohibits discrimination based on sex in any federally funded education program or activity
Last edited:
You still didn't answer the question I asked.
You answered the question you wanted to be asked.
Just because you and 50 MAGA senators say it's a federal issue does not prove it's a federal issue.
I don’t take orders, especially from those who support trans freaks in women’s sports.
Have someone read and explain this to you:
Yes, Title IX is a federal law. It's formally known as Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. This law prohibits discrimination based on sex in any federally funded education program or activity
Thanks for admitting you didn't answer my question, you just answered the question you wanted asked.
Title 9 has never been used to dictate to college athletic directors and coaches who can play on the teams.
You're trying to make a gigantic mountain out of a little tiny molehill.
Althea
Althea told me...
Once again, trump will be challenged in court for attempting to withhold approved spending at a college.
Althea
Althea told me...
As they should, but I'm not sure about those polls. Whereas the NCAA now realizes the folly of it's previous guidelines, it is only Blue states that still allow transgender athletes to compete against women.
The Thomas case was especially heinous because it took away basic rights of privacy in the locker room from the women. They were forced to share facilities with a fully intact male who admits to being attracted to women. Said women were basically told to 'suck it up', as the NCAA erred on the side of trans rights.
If anyone should apologize, it should be the NCAA. U. Penn. was just following flawed guidelines.
So some women need to be protected but others don't . What about equal protection under the law?Nope. That tells you they don't think it's a federal issue. That doesn't address the question I asked you.
"Most Democrats — around 7 in 10 — oppose allowing transgender female athletes to participate in women’s sports, according to a January New York Times/Ipsos poll."
Newsom opposes trans athletes in women's sports, splitting with progressives
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, used the inaugural episode of his new podcast to break from progressives by speaking out against allowing transgender women and girls to compete in female sports.
U Penn was complicit
Go ahead and they will lose. Once again. U Penn didn't capitulate for no reason.
Althea
Althea told me...
U Penn was forced to follow NCAA guidelines.
Althea
Althea told me...
trump hasn't won in court yet.
Penn to update records, apologize to women ‘disadvantaged’ by transgender swimmer
Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer, will no longer be listed as the school record-holder in three events.
www.syracuse.com
Damn. Before July 1st I would have said the same thing. But this time it is actually true.
Penn to update records, apologize to women ‘disadvantaged’ by transgender swimmer
By
Washington — The University of Pennsylvania says it will update records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas and apologize to female athletes “disadvantaged” by Thomas’ participation on the women’s swimming team, part of a resolution of a federal civil rights case.
The U.S. Education Department and Penn announced the voluntary agreement Tuesday. The case focused on Thomas, the transgender swimmer who last competed for the Ivy League school in Philadelphia in 2022, when she became the first openly transgender athlete to win a Division I title.
The department investigated Penn as part of the Trump administration’s broader attempt to remove transgender athletes from girls’ and women’s sports, finding the college violated the rights of female athletes.
More at link...
serendipity
Verified User
Most of the left on here defended it, Including Crypiss.
Newsom said that, and then still had trans athletes competing, has done nothing to change the law...Nope. That tells you they don't think it's a federal issue. That doesn't address the question I asked you.
"Most Democrats — around 7 in 10 — oppose allowing transgender female athletes to participate in women’s sports, according to a January New York Times/Ipsos poll."
Newsom opposes trans athletes in women's sports, splitting with progressives
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, used the inaugural episode of his new podcast to break from progressives by speaking out against allowing transgender women and girls to compete in female sports.
California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed on his podcast "This Is Gavin Newsom" in March 2025 that he believes it is "deeply unfair" for transgender women to compete in women's sports, citing fairness concerns in a conversation with conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Despite these remarks, California’s existing law, enacted in 2013 under then-Governor Jerry Brown, allows transgender athletes to participate in school sports consistent with their gender identity. Newsom has not taken action to change this law, and it remains in effect, meaning transgender women and girls continue to compete in women's sports in California.
In April 2025, California lawmakers rejected two Republican-backed bills that aimed to ban transgender athletes from participating in girls’ and women’s sports, indicating that the state’s policy has not shifted despite Newsom’s comments. Newsom declined to take a position on these bills, and his office has not confirmed any plans to alter the 2013 law. Additionally, in May 2025, Newsom supported a decision by the California Interscholastic Federation to expand eligibility for a track and field meet after controversy over a transgender athlete’s participation, suggesting a nuanced approach to balancing fairness with existing policies.
Thus, while Newsom voiced personal concerns about the fairness of transgender women competing in women’s sports, he has not moved one iota towards changing California’s policy, does not speak out or give opinions when those laws are in question, and transgender athletes continue to participate in women’s sports under the state’s current legal framework.
This is a classic case of saying one thing, then acting differently. It can also be called lying, and usually is by Cypress if someone he doesn't agree with politically does the same thing.
It's totally different questions as to whether one desires school districts and universities themselves to prevent transgender athletes from participating in NCAA women's sports, or whether one thinks a federal ban is necessary and the appropriate response.
Usually, conservatives claim we have too many laws already.
Outside of a small vocal minority, I don't remember hardly any Democrats defending Lia Thomas participating in the Penn women's swim team, and crushing all their records. That was preposterous, but I'm not going to get gas lighted into believing a tiny little mole hill is a gigantic mountain of a problem.
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
I gotta call bullshit on that, Mr. "Gloom, Despair, and Agony Oh Me".
So, you think it is "not conservative" to want to remove a law that forces schools to do something that he has said is "Deeply Unfair" and you have said you do not want?
You think they need to pass a law rather than to remove one? You are flailing. Desperate to gaslight us into some weird belief in a world where you vote for the people that do this you don't "really" support it. You are helpless "victims" of the folks you give money and votes to... forced to just stand there in dismay as they support laws you don't want that treat your daughters... well, as Newsom said "deeply unfair".
Next time you write that check supporting the people that go against what you say you want, and then cast that vote, and then tell me how much you didn't want the policies they have put in place... well, just know we aren't listening to your "we don't support that" we are watching your actions as you give support and votes to them... because that is exactly what you do.
You keep saying these things, but continue to vote for the people who make these laws, support the policies in the schools, and remain defensive when people point out the hypocrisy between your words and actions. If you want us to believe you are actually against this garbage do something about it, otherwise we'll continue to point out that you got what you voted for.
You want to distance yourself from your support and vote, from their inaction against and actions for, and you want us to believe that because they lie about it we are supposed to just believe that Newsom and your legislators are just victims of circumstance as they pass laws that 80% of you do not support?