SmarterthanYou
rebel
you said that the constitution trumps the commerce clause, yet the commerce clause is part of the constitution. so, yes, you're obviously confused
Mark Levin on Tariffs and courts.
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
SmarterthanYou
rebel
treaties are approved, or vetoed, by the senate.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
ok.
the commerce clause is still outranked by the constitution and no representative has a say.
senators have a small say.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
you libertarians actually hate the constitution and just only suck globalist dicks.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Dude, you've let your adoration for trump cloud your judgement and reasoning.....so much so, that you have clearly forgotten how the constitution works. The legislative is the sole purveyor of commerce power. what little commerce power the executive has was given to the executive by congressional approval and can be revoked at any time.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
no.
the constitution gave the president treaty power.
trade agreements are the purview of the president.
that's what the constitution says.
want me to quote it again?
I'm sorry your globalism has made you a deranged fascist.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
the constitution says that the senate can approve or veto a treaty proposed by the president, so trade agreements are NOT the sole purview of the president
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
basically sole purview.
the commerce clause is definitely trumped by the constitution.
you know this.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
ROFL the constitution trumps the constitution. I wish you could hear how stupid that sounds
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
I misspoke on that one.
the constitution trumps whatever law gave some power to Congress on this issue.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
you still lost.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
if you're saying a law can take away the president's contitutional powers then you don't understand the constitution or the concept of any constitutional government.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
the commerce clause resides with the legislative branch. all things regarding commerce, taxes, tariffs, trade agreements, etc.
The Commerce Clause gives Congress broad power to regulate interstate commerce and restricts states from impairing interstate commerce.
So much for your argument. It's not about international commerce. DUH! In addition, you ignore Congress's delegation to the Executive certain constitutional duties through acts or just doing nothing.
Constitution of the United States/Art. I/Sec. 8/Clause 3 Commerce
So, you believe that the Congress can negotiate and create foreign treaties with other nations? That's laughably stupid.
I cannot imagine a more inane argument than suggesting the President is not in charge of foreign policy including trade negotiations.
It is about INTERSTATE commerce. Not foreign trade.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
right I misspoke on that.
that is for internal matters.
the constitution grants treaty power to the president. with limited senate oversight.
its granted to the president because nations can be subverted through trade.
globalist fucktoids are traitors.
hang em high.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Assist
The Boxer Rebellion illustrates the potential dangers of foreign trade and influence by highlighting how excessive foreign control can lead to national unrest and violent backlash. It demonstrates that when a country feels economically exploited and culturally threatened, it may react with hostility, as seen when the Boxers sought to expel foreign powers from China.
Vaia
Sky HISTORY TV Channel
The Boxer Rebellion illustrates the potential dangers of foreign trade and influence by highlighting how excessive foreign control can lead to national unrest and violent backlash. It demonstrates that when a country feels economically exploited and culturally threatened, it may react with hostility, as seen when the Boxers sought to expel foreign powers from China.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
sorry, charlie, you must have missed this part "regulate commerce with foreign nations"The Commerce Clause gives Congress broad power to regulate interstate commerce and restricts states from impairing interstate commerce.
So much for your argument. It's not about international commerce. DUH! In addition, you ignore Congress's delegation to the Executive certain constitutional duties through acts or just doing nothing.
Constitution of the United States/Art. I/Sec. 8/Clause 3 Commerce
www.wikilawschool.org
SmarterthanYou
rebel
that is not what I said at all........try againSo, you believe that the Congress can negotiate and create foreign treaties with other nations? That's laughably stupid.
I cannot imagine a more inane argument than suggesting the President is not in charge of foreign policy including trade negotiations.