‘Monster Pediatrician’ Cheering Deaths Of ‘MAGA Children’ In Texas Flood Gets Fired!

"May all... children... be safe and dry." ALL CHILDREN. Because anyone with a brain knows that children can't be magas, liberals, or members of any political party.
Clearly, from the tone of her posts, and not just the one I put up as a sample, she was being sarcastic. She clearly intended for the post's overall tone to reflect that those who died had voted for Trump and thus voted for the cause of their deaths.
 
Clearly, from the tone of her posts, and not just the one I put up as a sample, she was being sarcastic. She clearly intended for the post's overall tone to reflect that those who died had voted for Trump and thus voted for the cause of their deaths.
You read into it what you wanted. I agree she was being sarcastic about trump voters and supporters, but not about the others, including children. Furthermore, she didn't even mention deaths in that post.

At least criticize her for what she said specifically, not what you think she said.
 
You read into it what you wanted. I agree she was being sarcastic about trump voters and supporters, but not about the others, including children. Furthermore, she didn't even mention deaths in that post.

At least criticize her for what she said specifically, not what you think she said.
Pretending a wish for them to "get what they voted for" was not "mentioning the deaths of children" when the subject of the conversation in which she was participating was the deaths of those children is you attempting to gaslight yourself in order to make yourself feel better about the position you wish to take.
 
You read into it what you wanted. I agree she was being sarcastic about trump voters and supporters, but not about the others, including children. Furthermore, she didn't even mention deaths in that post.

At least criticize her for what she said specifically, not what you think she said.
I clearly pointed out it was one of many she made and the overall tenor of them does show her gloating over the deaths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
She just said what all democrats are thinking. They love to see WHITE children die.




TDS...a voluntarily acquired affliction that brings the sufferer joy while they are destroying their life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
I clearly pointed out it was one of many she made and the overall tenor of them does show her gloating over the deaths.
It was the central subject of the conversation in which she was participating. You cannot separate the two things from each other. Her wish for folks that she thinks voted for someone she does not like to suffer when she said they wanted them to "get what they voted for" came in the middle of a conversation about how folks wish comfort for the folks that lost their children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
It was the central subject of the conversation in which she was participating. You cannot separate the two things from each other. Her wish for folks that she thinks voted for someone she does not like to suffer when she said they wanted them to "get what they voted for" came in the middle of a conversation about how folks wish comfort for the folks that lost their children.
False sincerity. She says one thing, then does the exact opposite. It's like punching someone in the face then telling them, "Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to do that!" when clearly you did mean to do it.
 
Pretending a wish for them to "get what they voted for" was not "mentioning the deaths of children" when the subject of the conversation in which she was participating was the deaths of those children is you attempting to gaslight yourself in order to make yourself feel better about the position you wish to take.
Shazam! And there it is, "GASLIGHT"... your default insult whenever someone disagrees with you. :LOL:

Keep gaslighting yourself that she cheered on the deaths of children even after she specifically named those who should stay safe and dry. In your make-believe world the sentence reads "May NO visitors, children, non-MAGA voters and pets be safe and dry."


1752173050559.png
 
Shazam! And there it is, "GASLIGHT"... your default insult whenever someone disagrees with you. :LOL:

Keep gaslighting yourself that she cheered on the deaths of children even after she specifically named those who should stay safe and dry. In your make-believe world the sentence reads "May NO visitors, children, non-MAGA voters and pets be safe and dry."


View attachment 53906
Again, the post is in the middle of a conversation about those deaths. It was not made in a vacuum.

Yes, gaslighting yourself.

Let's break down this post as if it was in a vacuum, it still wishes for the deaths of children and pets of voters that disagreed with her.

First she wishes for safe and dry children and pets for "non MAGA voters"...

Then she separates out "MAGA" voters for a different result, because they believe something different than she does.

Even without the actual conversation, this STILL means she is wishing for the pets and children of voters she disagrees to be the opposite of "safe and dry" they get to have "what they" supposedly "voted for"...

That is one foul and vile human you are defending, Christiefan.
 
I posted a link to the article. Read it and the posts are there. I'm not doing your damn homework!
I did look, dummy. There were two other comments about the flood and she said the same thing she did in the first pic. Most of the comments on that site are by some dingbat, "Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella," who seems to have a lot of time to bash liberals on her maga account.

"I continue to pray for the decent people, CHILDREN, visitors and pets, etc."

1752174224215.png 1752175051147.png
 
I did look, dummy. There were two other comments about the flood and she said the same thing she did in the first pic. Most of the comments on that site are by some dingbat, "Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella," who seems to have a lot of time to bash liberals on her maga account.

"I continue to pray for the decent people, CHILDREN, visitors and pets, etc."

View attachment 53907 View attachment 53908
She made something that shouldn't be political all about politics. She should be fired. Not the first time, nor the last that will happen. Employers usually frown on this sort of thing because it implicates them in the personal politics of an employee where they may not agree with the viewpoint of that employee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
Again, the post is in the middle of a conversation about those deaths. It was not made in a vacuum.

Yes, gaslighting yourself.

Let's break down this post as if it was in a vacuum, it still wishes for the deaths of children and pets of voters that disagreed with her.

First she wishes for safe and dry children and pets for "non MAGA voters"...

Then she separates out "MAGA" voters for a different result, because they believe something different than she does.

Even without the actual conversation, this STILL means she is wishing for the pets and children of voters she disagrees to be the opposite of "safe and dry" they get to have "what they" supposedly "voted for"...

That is one foul and vile human you are defending, Christiefan.
More tortured thinking from you. Clearly you didn't read the post correctly because she didn't say she "wishes safe and dry etc." FOR non-maga voters, she said AND non-maga voters. Maybe you think she should have said she wishes safety for everybody, but she didn't so know you want to pretend she's cheering deaths of maga children. That's low for you.

I didn't see this much outrage from you for any nasty comments trump made about wishing death on people.
 
I clearly pointed out it was one of many she made and the overall tenor of them does show her gloating over the deaths.
She made something that shouldn't be political all about politics. She should be fired. Not the first time, nor the last that will happen. Employers usually frown on this sort of thing because it implicates them in the personal politics of an employee where they may not agree with the viewpoint of that employee.
Remind me when you suggested firing for magas and republicans who do the same.
 
Remind me when you suggested firing for magas and republicans who do the same.
I will when they do it to. So far, most of the cases I've seen--I remember one where a CFO in Tucson videoed himself going through a Chic-fil-A drive through for a free water during a protest against that company for not supporting abortion and he ranted on the poor girl at the window handing him the water. He got fired too.

The Left seems to love political theater of this sort far more than the Right, but that doesn't excuse the Right.
 
She made something that shouldn't be political all about politics. She should be fired. Not the first time, nor the last that will happen. Employers usually frown on this sort of thing because it implicates them in the personal politics of an employee where they may not agree with the viewpoint of that employee.
She became a negative to the Blue Fish Pediatrics practice. They understandably gave her the boot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
Back
Top