Activist Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers

[Into the Night]

Where does it say that they can only be subject to some laws?

Treaty.

But let's assume that you are correct about only some laws. That leads to the following.
You are saying that Indians should have been covered under the 14th.

The 14th amendment does not apply to Indians. It applies only to the federal and State governments.

You are making a strong argument for why it was wrong to not allow Indians to be citizens at birth.

Indians are citizens of the tribe, and of the confederation (if they have one), and of the United States).

Because one group was denied their rights under the Constitution doesn't mean you can then deny another group their rights.

Illegal aliens have NO right to remain in the United States. They are immediately subject to deportation.

The result of your argument is that you can't deny citizenship to the children of undocumented immigrants because undocumented immigrants are subject to some laws when in the US.

ALL Illegal aliens are subject to the laws of the United States while they are here. That does NOT grant them citizenship.

 

[Into the Night]

Non sequitor on your part.
The 14th amendment makes a person born in the US a US citizen and also a citizen of the state they are born in.

No, it doesn't.

 

[Into the Night]

The section I quoted cites Federal rule 23 which says nothing about consolidating similar cases.

Rule 23. Class Actions

www.law.cornell.edu

Strawman fallacy. You cannot change the Constitution that way!

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

ALL Illegal aliens are subject to the laws of the United States while they are here. That does NOT grant them citizenship.

That means they are subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

 

[Into the Night]

That means they are subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

No. They are subject to the jurisdiction of their originating nation. That's where they will be deported to.