AOC welcomes socialist Mamdani to nation's capital as Dem leaders withhold endorsements

But he’s saying what you claim the MAGAs say. Why do you give him a pass?
So this is the thing you trumptards always do. You find one person - take something they say - usually out of context - and then paint the entire political party as going along with this one person. Sorry, man. You're part of a cult. I'm an independant thinker.

Pity you, man. You're on the wrong side and don't even realize it.
 
In the 50's to 70's Europe was much more socialist than it is today. That turned into a massive failure that had to be undone with a return to more capitalism.
Are you crazy? The happiest countries in the world are the ones you cann socialist. They are capitalistic countries that do not rob the working class and make the rich, super rich. https://www.shareable.net/the-top-1...NAO_0&gclid=Cj0KCQjwm93DBhD_ARIsADR_DjF8OnCbs You right-wing idiots vote for your masters. In America, the wealthy separate from the people. They do not go to the same schools, the same restaurants, play the same golf courses, go to same gyms. They live in heavily policed and gated communities.
They do not want to face the people that they are robbing.
 
Are you crazy? The happiest countries in the world are the ones you cann socialist. They are capitalistic countries that do not rob the working class and make the rich, super rich. https://www.shareable.net/the-top-1...NAO_0&gclid=Cj0KCQjwm93DBhD_ARIsADR_DjF8OnCbs You right-wing idiots vote for your masters. In America, the wealthy separate from the people. They do not go to the same schools, the same restaurants, play the same golf courses, go to same gyms. They live in heavily policed and gated communities.
They do not want to face the people that they are robbing.
You're wrong about why. They're all monolithic societies with a small footprint. That has far more to do with their social happiness than anything the article claims.
 
So this is the thing you trumptards always do. You find one person - take something they say - usually out of context - and then paint the entire political party as going along with this one person.
Out of context?!? Why don’t you have a subscription to the NYTimes? The Old Grey Lady. Can’t afford it? Too cheap? Too far to the right of Mother Jones?
It leans left. By quite a bit. You’d agree with most all of it… until it doesn’t meet your far left requirements.
Even I agree with about half of it. But carry on. It’s exactly what the Trump cult wants.
I also have a subscription to The Economist which AllSides rates ‘leaning left’. I’m sure you consider that Nazi propaganda.
Sorry, man. You're part of a cult. I'm an independant thinker.
You’re far left and are too blind with TDS to realize it.
Pity you, man. You're on the wrong side and don't even realize it.
To the right of Stalin? Lenin? Yeah, I realize it.
 
Last edited:
In the 50's to 70's Europe was much more socialist than it is today. That turned into a massive failure that had to be undone with a return to more capitalism.
Not so, except for Greece, pretty much today as it was then with some modification, every economy is mixed, none are pure one or the other, even the US, has been since the 19th Century
 
Out of context?!? Why don’t you have a subscription to the NYTimes? The Old Grey Lady. Can’t afford it? Too cheap? Too far to the right of Mother Jones?
It leans left. By quite a bit. You’d agree with most all of it… until it doesn’t meet your far left requirements.
Even I agree with about half of it. But carry on. It’s exactly what the Trump cult wants.
I also have a subscription to The Economist which AllSides rates ‘leaning left’. I’m sure you consider that Nazi propaganda.

You’re far left and are too blind with TDS to realize it.

To the right of Stalin? Lenin? Yeah, I realize it.
You asked me if I gave this one opinion writer a pass. I told you I don't give a shit about what one person said. Now you hit me with even more trumptard propaganda.

Focus on this: I don't give a shit about what the one guy said. The difference between you and me - you let your party get away with any evil shit. If my party's president was selling meme coins out of the Oval office and claiming the other party made up the Epstein scandal - I'd call the Democrats out.

You're a drone.
 
The difference between you and me - you let your party get away with any evil shit.
My party is irrelevant. I'm a registered Libertarian.
Now you hit me with even more trumptard propaganda.
So now mentioning a NYTimes article written by a well known democrat is MAGA propaganda in your world.
See? That's how far to the left you are.
And the fact that you defend a guy that openly supports worldwide jihad is quite revealing.
 
My party is irrelevant. I'm a registered Libertarian.

So now mentioning a NYTimes article written by a well known democrat is MAGA propaganda in your world.
See? That's how far to the left you are.
And the fact that you defend a guy that openly supports worldwide jihad is quite revealing.
You got that right, being libertarian certainly is irrelevant, just a clever way of hiding a love of Trumpism
 
Not so, except for Greece, pretty much today as it was then with some modification, every economy is mixed, none are pure one or the other, even the US, has been since the 19th Century
Bullshit. As one example, most of the automotive industry in Europe was state owned and run back then. Since then, the companies were reprivatized to bring them back to life. An excellent example of this is British Leyland. The aircraft industry was the same way.


The social-welfare state exploded in size.

Then it all fell apart in the 80's and Europe has been recovering from that Socialist excess ever since.
 
You got that right, being libertarian certainly is irrelevant, just a clever way of hiding a love of Trumpism
I changed my registration to Libertarian in 1999 when I became disillusioned w/ the republican party. Are you saying I was clairvoyant back then and knew trump would be a force in politics 17 years later?
I don't even vote libertarian anymore. I'm getting to the point where I don't even vote for president.
 
My party is irrelevant. I'm a registered Libertarian.

So now mentioning a NYTimes article written by a well known democrat is MAGA propaganda in your world.
See? That's how far to the left you are.
And the fact that you defend a guy that openly supports worldwide jihad is quite revealing.
Now, frustrated that your gaslighting isn't working you've decided to pull the trumptard "Strawman" argument.

Now I'm going to type this very slowly for the last time, so hopefully you'll be able to wrap your trump-fluffing mind around it. You ready?

I'm not defending anyone. I don't give a fucking shit about this one guy I know hardly anything about.

You're no libertarian. You post and argue exactly like a mindless trumptard drone.

Now - go ahead and post again how I'm "defending" anyone. Dick.
 
I think he could.
Mamdani 2028 !
Hey they installed Biden in the White House.
I changed my registration to Libertarian in 1999 when I became disillusioned w/ the republican party. Are you saying I was clairvoyant back then and knew trump would be a force in politics 17 years later?
I don't even vote libertarian anymore. I'm getting to the point where I don't even vote for president.
Then you should vote against the person you would least like to be President.
 
Mamdani is a capitalist socialist, you dipstick! And he's not afraid of calling out your christo-fascist leadership for what they are. He's a threat to the donor class that runs our politics because he got on the ticket WITHOUT THEIR HELP. The donor class runs the Dems and the GOP (i.e., AIPAC).

AOC, the squad, Pritzker, Wahls .... they represent what Peolsi & Schumer are not ... unapologetic fighters for the people.
 
Now, frustrated that your gaslighting isn't working you've decided to pull the trumptard "Strawman" argument.

Now I'm going to type this very slowly for the last time, so hopefully you'll be able to wrap your trump-fluffing mind around it. You ready?

I'm not defending anyone. I don't give a fucking shit about this one guy I know hardly anything about.

You're no libertarian. You post and argue exactly like a mindless trumptard drone.

Now - go ahead and post again how I'm "defending" anyone. Dick.
So basically I was clairvoyant back in 1999.
I have superpowers ! :D
 
He is really a Marxist he just calls himself a Democratic Socialists to seem more palatable. I saw him say he wanted to seize the means of production which is NOT Socialism it is Communism. Mark my words he will damage the Democrat party. I'm OK with that. :laugh:

The Dems must be shitting themselves that this clown gets in as mayor.
 
You're wrong about why. They're all monolithic societies with a small footprint. That has far more to do with their social happiness than anything the article claims.
He's correct...and it is you who is wrong, TA.

In any case, anyone who does not realize that American capitalism can be improved remarkably by borrowing some ideas from the socialists...is just ignorant.

They were smart enough to realize that borrowing ideas from the capitalists made them stronger. Too bad the people who love to ass-kiss the elites are not smart enough to see the benefits.
 
Venezuela has a socialist government.

Their citizens are leaving in search of food and medicine.

This is what the far left loons want for America.

Where does one go for food and medicine if America were to turn to socialism?
 
Back
Top