Obama May Be Subpoenaed Over ‘Seditious Conspiracy’ Scheme

FastLane said:
The meeting at the White House with Obama Clapper Comey and Susan Rice
Click to expand...
OMG. A meeting at the WH by a President and his advisors is treason?
Does that mean Trump is committing Treason every time he meets his cabinet?

A President meeting with his advisors can't even come close to meeting the requirements for treason which requires giving direct aid to an enemy. How stupid do you have to be to think that such a meeting is treason?
 
FastLane said:
The meeting at the White House with Obama Clapper Comey and Susan Rice
Click to expand...
How does this implicate Obama? The entire document is about foreign interference, especially Russian interference.

Page 84: Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort compared to previous operations.

We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in the summer of 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump. We have high confidence in these judgments based on a body of intelligence reporting and the public behavior of senior Russian officials and state controlled media.

We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment based on sensitive information not included in this version of the assessment; NSA has moderate confidence in this judgment based on the same sensitive information. NSA’s confidence in this judgment would be elevated to high with additional corroborating sources.
 
FastLane said:
The meeting at the White House with Obama Clapper Comey and Susan Rice
Click to expand...
a0yvq7.jpg
 
volsrocks said:
AI Overview

While presidential immunity generally protects a president from criminal prosecution for official acts while in office, this protection does not extend to treason


WHOOPS
Click to expand...
The entire document is about the investigation into foreign interference in our elections, specifically Russian interference. Clearly neither you nor any other maga read it. But if you did, please cite the page number(s) showing Obama's treason.

Pages 93 & 94: As the US presidential campaign progressed, Kremlin support for President-elect Trump was evident in domestic media coverage, coincident with the broader influence campaign. Putin’s chief propagandist Dmitriy Kiselev used his flagship weekly newsmagazine program this fall to cast President-elect Trump as an outsider victimized by a corrupt political establishment and faulty democratic election process that aimed to prevent his election because of his desire to work with Moscow, judging from Russian state media and international press reporting.

Pro-Kremlin proxy Vladimir Zhirinovskiy, leader of the nationalist Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, proclaimed just before the election that if President-elect Trump won, Russia would "drink Champagne" in anticipation of being able to advance its positions on Syria and Ukraine. The head of Russia's most prestigious public polling center told a Washington audience later in November that Russians regarded the election results as another in what they see as a series of Putin's successes.
 
christiefan915 said:
Like trump using his office to torpedo the results of a free and fair election back in 2020.
Click to expand...
Trump, unlike Obama, questioned the outcome, something the Hildabeast, and others, have done in virtually every election to one degree or another. Obama et al. are accused of ginning up fictional 'dirt' on their opponent for purposes of smearing them to generate negative voter reactions that would cause voters to not vote for that opponent. That's during the election cycle, not after it.

Since it was done using government resources and with the concurrence of persons in official government positions, that makes what they did highly illegal attempts at voter manipulation and fraud. See, for example, the Bush II memos that were forged that Dan Rather put out on CBS to smear Bush during an election. Rather was forced to retire over that one as his credibility was destroyed.

That event was timed to pre-Internet standards with the expectation that it would take weeks or months to discover the fraud, and the election would be over. Instead, with the Internet, in less than 72 hours the documents were proven fraudulent, and Rather's career was destroyed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top