Trump releases DOJ memos showing Biden DOJ wanted to declare parents "terrorists"

T. A. Gardner

T. A. Gardner

Serial Thread Killer
Yep, once again, the Biden administration was showing its fascist streak as the Biden DOJ under Garland, discussed at length how they could declare parents who complained or protested at school board meetings about Leftist agenda items like CRT or LGBTPDQRSTUV crap domestic terrorists and arrest them.

 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yep, once again, the Biden administration was showing its fascist streak as the Biden DOJ under Garland, discussed at length how they could declare parents who complained or protested at school board meetings about Leftist agenda items like CRT or LGBTPDQRSTUV crap domestic terrorists and arrest them.

Click to expand...
Expect us to read a lengthy PDF?
 
AProudLefty said:
Expect us to read a lengthy PDF?
Click to expand...
No, but it is definitive proof that the DOJ was out to get parents that raised a stink about Leftist agendas at school board meetings. At the time, the Biden administration, DOJ, and their allies in the MSM were all saying this wasn't true and it was much ado about nothing.
 
Garland equated the act of objecting to students being indoctrinated in Critical Race Theory, to the Parents committing violence against the school administrators, even though no threats were made, no blows were struck, no weapons were present, and a calm, civil tone was kept by those objecting to the CRT being used a the school.


That is clearly abuse of power, and false testimony. Garland should spend the rest of his life in prison.


-
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, but it is definitive proof that the DOJ was out to get parents that raised a stink about Leftist agendas at school board meetings. At the time, the Biden administration, DOJ, and their allies in the MSM were all saying this wasn't true and it was much ado about nothing.
Click to expand...
It isn't definitive proof. Sorry.
 
AI Overview
faviconV2

faviconV2

faviconV2

+11


Following reports of increased harassment and threats against school officials, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter to President Joe Biden in September 2021, requesting federal assistance to address safety concerns
. The letter suggested that some incidents could be considered "domestic terrorism or hate crimes," and recommended using the Patriot Act and other federal counterterrorism tools to address threats against school boards. The NSBA later retracted the letter and apologized for its wording after receiving criticism from various groups and organizations.
Attorney General Merrick Garland subsequently issued a memo directing the FBI and US Attorneys to address the rise in threats and harassment against school officials, according to Congress.gov. Garland stated that while debate on policy matters is protected, this protection does not extend to threats of violence or intimidation based on an individual's views. He emphasized that the memo focused on criminal conduct and not on parents' views or opinions. In congressional testimony, Garland reiterated that parents voicing concerns at school board meetings are protected under the First Amendment's freedom of speech.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yep, once again, the Biden administration was showing its fascist streak as the Biden DOJ under Garland, discussed at length how they could declare parents who complained or protested at school board meetings about Leftist agenda items like CRT or LGBTPDQRSTUV crap domestic terrorists and arrest them.

Click to expand...
Would you care to tell us which email you think shows they wanted to declare parents terrorists?
They were investigating threats against government officials.

Threats of physical harm may be prosecuted Federally.

Looks to me like they are concerned with actual threats and not protestors since a later email specifically says the

vast majority of the behavior cited cannot be reached by federal law... the language being used is protected by the first amendment. (page 15)

I see nothing that shows they wanted to declare anyone a terrorist. Most of them are about how to phrase the words that "criminal threats will not be tolerated."

This is about declaring terrorist threats as terrorist threats. It says nothing about declaring parents who complain domestic terrorists. There is one email that discusses the DOJ 30 days of strategy sessions to discuss threats against school boards, teachers and other school employees. (page 41)

There is one AP story included that says a group asked the US government for help likening the threats against them to domestic terrorism. (page 65)
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No, but it is definitive proof that the DOJ was out to get parents that raised a stink about Leftist agendas at school board meetings. At the time, the Biden administration, DOJ, and their allies in the MSM were all saying this wasn't true and it was much ado about nothing.
Click to expand...
Where the hell is this in the emails?


The only thing I see is you lying your ass off about what is actually in the emails.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Would you care to tell us which email you think shows they wanted to declare parents terrorists?
They were investigating threats against government officials.

Threats of physical harm may be prosecuted Federally.

Looks to me like they are concerned with actual threats and not protestors since a later email specifically says the

vast majority of the behavior cited cannot be reached by federal law... the language being used is protected by the first amendment. (page 15)

I see nothing that shows they wanted to declare anyone a terrorist. Most of them are about how to phrase the words that "criminal threats will not be tolerated."

This is about declaring terrorist threats as terrorist threats. It says nothing about declaring parents who complain domestic terrorists. There is one email that discusses the DOJ 30 days of strategy sessions to discuss threats against school boards, teachers and other school employees. (page 41)

There is one AP story included that says a group asked the US government for help likening the threats against them to domestic terrorism. (page 65)
Click to expand...
The overall tenor of the discussion among DOJ personnel in this matter was clearly that they were looking for a way to criminalize parent protests at school board meetings as a federal crime. That's the point here, they were trying to criminalize speech they didn't like.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The overall tenor of the discussion among DOJ personnel in this matter was clearly that they were looking for a way to criminalize parent protests at school board meetings as a federal crime. That's the point here, they were trying to criminalize speech they didn't like.
Click to expand...
ROFLMAO. Point to one instance of that. I will await your response but I have no expectations you will find anything of the sort.


The overall tenor is that they said they were against violence and threats of violence as I quoted to you.

Here is another quote that disputes your take.

If this is about the threats to school boards, then we should say
*Threats [made by an adult] of physical harm in interstate or foreign commerce my be prosecuted federally, 18 USC 875, as may threats made because of a protracted characteristic (race, color, religion, national origin) and made to interfere with federally protected activity such as public school employment or education. (page 19)

The Trump DOJ charged someone with violation of 18 USC 875 for simply hitting a fence with their hands. So let's talk about who is trying to criminalize protests. It certainly wasn't the Biden administration.

Then when we get to page 23 it makes it very clear that the purpose was to open a line of communication to report threats.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yep, once again, the Biden administration was showing its fascist streak as the Biden DOJ under Garland, discussed at length how they could declare parents who complained or protested at school board meetings about Leftist agenda items like CRT or LGBTPDQRSTUV crap domestic terrorists and arrest them.

Click to expand...
:lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup: :lolup:
 
AProudLefty said:
AI Overview
faviconV2

faviconV2

faviconV2

+11


Following reports of increased harassment and threats against school officials, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter to President Joe Biden in September 2021, requesting federal assistance to address safety concerns
. The letter suggested that some incidents could be considered "domestic terrorism or hate crimes," and recommended using the Patriot Act and other federal counterterrorism tools to address threats against school boards. The NSBA later retracted the letter and apologized for its wording after receiving criticism from various groups and organizations.
Attorney General Merrick Garland subsequently issued a memo directing the FBI and US Attorneys to address the rise in threats and harassment against school officials, according to Congress.gov. Garland stated that while debate on policy matters is protected, this protection does not extend to threats of violence or intimidation based on an individual's views. He emphasized that the memo focused on criminal conduct and not on parents' views or opinions. In congressional testimony, Garland reiterated that parents voicing concerns at school board meetings are protected under the First Amendment's freedom of speech.
Click to expand...

You and your pesky details. lol
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Would you care to tell us which email you think shows they wanted to declare parents terrorists?
They were investigating threats against government officials.

Threats of physical harm may be prosecuted Federally.

Looks to me like they are concerned with actual threats and not protestors since a later email specifically says the

vast majority of the behavior cited cannot be reached by federal law... the language being used is protected by the first amendment. (page 15)

I see nothing that shows they wanted to declare anyone a terrorist. Most of them are about how to phrase the words that "criminal threats will not be tolerated."

This is about declaring terrorist threats as terrorist threats. It says nothing about declaring parents who complain domestic terrorists. There is one email that discusses the DOJ 30 days of strategy sessions to discuss threats against school boards, teachers and other school employees. (page 41)

There is one AP story included that says a group asked the US government for help likening the threats against them to domestic terrorism. (page 65)
Click to expand...

More pesky details.

The MAGATs are truly desperate now.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The overall tenor of the discussion among DOJ personnel in this matter was clearly that they were looking for a way to criminalize parent protests at school board meetings as a federal crime. That's the point here, they were trying to criminalize speech they didn't like.
Click to expand...

Hockey pucky. You see commies, LW terrorists, Antifa, and BLM everywhere you look.

It almost sounds as though you're fine with unhinged people threatening school personnel and suggesting such threats be dismissed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top