UFO congressional hearings

I think there are way too many billions of smartphones on the planet now to have any excuses for not having a shit load of crystal clear and unambiguous videos of alien spaceships.
Not to mention that every space alien is required to have his body cam operating whenever it is in our atmosphere.
 
What does UFOs and global warming have in common???????
Read the post. Oh, scratch that, I forgot that you aren't very effective in that area.

What they have in common is that anyone talking about either has absolutely no personal experience or reason to believe in such, but nonetheless expresses his absolute certainty in such because he knows someone he positively has to trust in telling him what to believe, e.g. "I have to trust the neighbors" or "I have to trust the scientists" or "I have to trust the sanitation workers" or "I have to trust the MSNBC crew", etc. Then he will shift gears and instead profess his faith in the entirely fictional "The Data" that he was told to thoroughly believe exists.
 
I think there are way too many billions of smartphones on the planet now to have any excuses for not having a shit load of crystal clear and unambiguous videos of alien spaceships.

The explanation that the Phoenix lights were Air Force flares is plausible to me. I don't think there is any good photographic evidence of the Belgian UFO swarm, and Belgian Air Force pilots did not make any visual contact. The English crop circles are known to be a hoax.
1. There were a few videos of the Phoenix lights as they happened. The "simulation" done by the local military is visibly different in several ways (i.e., illumination, drift). www.facts.net/history/historical-events/35-facts-about-phoenix-lights/

2. The Belgian air force, went on record that their ground and fighter radar contacts were synonymous. www. ufocasebook.com/belgianreport.html

3. Not all in their history:
(1686) The Natural History of Stafford-Shire. Robert Plot, LLD, Keeper of the Ashmolean Museum and Professor of Chemistry in the University of Oxford.

The first known ‘crop circle investigator’ was Robert Plot, Professor of Chemistry at Oxford University in late 1600’s. In 1680, Plot visited farms in southern England to examine this phenomenon first-hand.

Robert Plot, in his words, ‘excavated’ over 50 crop circle sites, and noted farmers’ stories about other crop circle reports. Plot noted simple circles, circles with squares, circle rings, and spirals. Plot noted that animals tended to stay away from crop ‘figures.’ Plot did his own historical research, uncovering additional historical reports. Plot published his first work mentioning crop circles in 1686 in the book The Natural History of Stafford-Shire. Plot hypothesized that crop circles were formed by hollow thunderbolts - - or else it was elves, dancing witches, deer, or mosses. Plot did the first ‘crop circle’ soil sample testing -- he compared dirt from the center of circles with dirt from the inside edge of the circles, and with dirt from outside the circles; where he noted soil dehydration in the circles, and occasionally finding white, sulfurous residues. Plot noted that crop yields, in the areas within the crop circle boundaries in successive years, increased by up to 30%. Many of these same findings are still being found in crop circle formations today.​
 
1. There were a few videos of the Phoenix lights as they happened. The "simulation" done by the local military is visibly different in several ways (i.e., illumination, drift). www.facts.net/history/historical-events/35-facts-about-phoenix-lights/
I remember seeing videos of the Phoenix lights, and once the Air force explained they were a nighttime flare test that explanation seemed eminently plausible to me. More plausible than the idea that they were interstellar alien spaceships.
2. The Belgian air force, went on record that their ground and fighter radar contacts were synonymous. www. ufocasebook.com/belgianreport.html
I read that the Belgian pilots never made any visual contact, and radar or atmospheric anomalies seem a more plausible explanation to me than the idea they were exotic spaceships piloted by aliens.
 
I remember seeing videos of the Phoenix lights, and once the Air force explained they were a nighttime flare test that explanation seemed eminently plausible to me. More plausible than the idea that they were interstellar alien spaceships.

I read that the Belgian pilots never made any visual contact, and radar or atmospheric anomalies seem a more plausible explanation to me than the idea they were exotic spaceships piloted by aliens.
And there lies the rub:

1. The difference between the civilian videos of the Phoenix lights is VASTLY different from the "official" military one, as the latter shows DRIFT, as opposed to linear MOVEMENT, as you would see a plane do.

2. The Belgian air force made ground contact radar before dispatching their jets, who confirmed by their radar. Last time I checked, you don't have periodic scrambling of jets due to "atmospheric anomalies" in any military setting. They would check with weather services for that.

3. People just can't handle the very thought that there is proof of extra-terrestrial life that has superior tech and is observing and interacting with us (sometimes not so friendly). Yet you have some of the very same people take time to visit a specific place to worship an invisible, omnipotent father figure that's verified with nothing more than word of mouth.
 
And there lies the rub:

1. The difference between the civilian videos of the Phoenix lights is VASTLY different from the "official" military one, as the latter shows DRIFT, as opposed to linear MOVEMENT, as you would see a plane do.

2. The Belgian air force made ground contact radar before dispatching their jets, who confirmed by their radar. Last time I checked, you don't have periodic scrambling of jets due to "atmospheric anomalies" in any military setting. They would check with weather services for that.

3. People just can't handle the very thought that there is proof of extra-terrestrial life that has superior tech and is observing and interacting with us (sometimes not so friendly). Yet you have some of the very same people take time to visit a specific place to worship an invisible, omnipotent father figure that's verified with nothing more than word of mouth.

Just my opinion, but I've never seen or heard of any convincing evidence that aliens piloting spaceships are visiting Earth.


The Pentagon Disinformation That Fueled America’s UFO Mythology​

U.S. military fabricated evidence of alien technology and allowed rumors to fester to cover up real secret-weapons programs​



 
Just my opinion, but I've never seen or heard of any convincing evidence that aliens piloting spaceships are visiting Earth.


The Pentagon Disinformation That Fueled America’s UFO Mythology​

U.S. military fabricated evidence of alien technology and allowed rumors to fester to cover up real secret-weapons programs​



Your "opinion" is based on the premise of what you 'DIDN'T HEAR" .... or more to the point what you would like to hear.

That brings us to the latest BS from authorities to push the narrative that all UFO's are really secret testing by the military for advanced weaponry and air/space travel vehicles.

This came about as that grainy video footage along with audio of Naval jets tracking a UFO from a few years ago was released. Coincidently, you have a "reclassification" from UFO to UAP ... replete with some former military intelligence joker running around making videos alluding to a UAP investigation that lends to terrestrial domestic causes.

- Yet they still have no plausible explanation as to the Washington in 1952.
- Yet UFO sightings by American astronauts throughout NASA's history can't be explained or denied.
Then there are these: www.interestingengineering.com/culture/11-of-the-most-mysterious-unresolved-ufo-cases-of-the-modern-era
 
Back
Top