INCOME TAX ELIMINATION

zymurgy said:
projection

I posted actual spending in prior months, and you talk about future numbers

jackass is putting it kindly. read the link and come back with an actual point dipshit
Click to expand...
Thanks for your kindness.

I've got a couple of opinions about your 'knowledge' and your reply. It might be a bit much for you, so I'm allowing the 'call a friend' cheat, lol. You can holler up to your parents or caretakers for help as well.

First, I've seen so many pathetic brain-dead sheep bleating "PROJECTION" lately. Did you and your fellow knuckle-draggers crowd into some discount word of the month seminar to learn, only to mangle it like dumbasses? Seriously, it's not a difficult word to grasp, but most of you haven't quite got the hang of when and how to use it, lol. 2nd, I waded through your pitiful "article" and the rest of the steaming trash heap on the website you used as a "source," and it's painfully obvious you're not working with.

Personally, I like to write from my own experience, knowledge, and, shockingly, my actual thoughts, and sure an occasional article to go along with it. Try it sometime instead of vomiting clickbait like a gutless drone. That's the move, slap a link to some shitty rag, call it holy scripture, and demand everyone respond to your tabloid garbage with more tabloid trash. I don't think this forum is supposed to be a dumpster for article-swapping, although it often seems to be.

You're the classic useful idiot, slurping up any drivel some bottom-dwelling "journalist" churns out if it fits your pre-determined narrative. Every piece on your source site is full of lies and/or half-cocked truths, meticulously stripped of anything that might challenge the pre-baked narrative. They know suckers like you won't question the slop they feed you, since it strokes your biases perfectly. That's what I call low-resolution thinking, a common problem we face in today's political warriors like yourself.

For example, take a favorite fairy tale like women unfairly being underpaid compared to men. Some agenda-pushing editor cherry-picks a "FACT," slaps a stat on it, and morons like you scarf it down, thinking you're suddenly a scholar. Newsflash: those "facts" are one variable of at least 20 that need to be understood to get the true answer. I'd break it down, but you'd just barf up more drivel and throw out 'projection!' again, like a predictable puppet.

Stop being a lapdog for the narrative peddlers and grow some balls. I wrote about some very basic and real economics, grounded in history and market mechanics, simple and basic concepts that history proves. Trump's setting us up for explosive growth that'll make the OMB's projections look like a toddler's doodle. He's fixing the wreckage libtards left behind, strengthening defense for our nation's security, past, present, and future, while slashing the corrupt, wasteful spending that's been robbing Americans blind to quite literally facilitate the destruction of the American way.

The spending you're whining about is mostly either previous commitments that can't be stopped for a variety of reasons or for the previously mentioned fixing the destruction from the Biden nightmare. Trump is ensuring that we are the clear and dominant leader economically and as the undisputed king of lethal military dominance in the world. His tariffs and growth alone will cover that bill entirely. Keep in mind the things he is spending on are actually authorized in our Constitution unlike the majority of spending for many decades, things we should actually be spending on. Granted, we are a long way from solving the many problems we're facing, but he's getting us on the right track, growth and reducing fraud and waste alone is a great start in the right direction. Let's see what things look like in the next few years, otherwise known as the future. You seem to be burdened by what was, lol.

All of that said, I'd be happy to discuss any one specific line item that 'Trump' is spending from that killer article or any article for that matter. I'd be happy to do a deep dive beyond level one of your low-resolution thinking and see if we can come to a conclusion that verifies your complaint. Will you? No, of course not. I'll get some 3rd grade insult and a complaint about how many words this reply is, claiming you wouldn't waste your time reading it, or ignoring the challenge because I missed the point. lol. No worries, I got the point, the point is you want to bitch and claim your standing on a mountain of 'facts' and anyone not seeing it, is a moron. Or you'll just cry 'projection' again. lmao
 
Defense spending should be tripled, just to make up for decades of cuts. Henry George had a great idea, which was a national tax on real estate, but unlike his idea, it should be solely devoted to national defense, i.e. military and border patrol funding. Now that the GOP establishment has its trained parrots running around channeling Jane Fonda and fighting over who gets to lick her ankles, we are not seeing any real increase, and a ta critical time in history. This of course only increased the chance of big wars, not decreased it, same as it always has in the past. WE saw the results of cuts under Obama and his appeasement policies; only idiots will demand the U.S. repeat that atrocity.
 
Tobytone said:
Thanks for your kindness.

I've got a couple of opinions about your 'knowledge' and your reply. It might be a bit much for you, so I'm allowing the 'call a friend' cheat, lol. You can holler up to your parents or caretakers for help as well.

First, I've seen so many pathetic brain-dead sheep bleating "PROJECTION" lately. Did you and your fellow knuckle-draggers crowd into some discount word of the month seminar to learn, only to mangle it like dumbasses? Seriously, it's not a difficult word to grasp, but most of you haven't quite got the hang of when and how to use it, lol. 2nd, I waded through your pitiful "article" and the rest of the steaming trash heap on the website you used as a "source," and it's painfully obvious you're not working with.

Personally, I like to write from my own experience, knowledge, and, shockingly, my actual thoughts, and sure an occasional article to go along with it. Try it sometime instead of vomiting clickbait like a gutless drone. That's the move, slap a link to some shitty rag, call it holy scripture, and demand everyone respond to your tabloid garbage with more tabloid trash. I don't think this forum is supposed to be a dumpster for article-swapping, although it often seems to be.

You're the classic useful idiot, slurping up any drivel some bottom-dwelling "journalist" churns out if it fits your pre-determined narrative. Every piece on your source site is full of lies and/or half-cocked truths, meticulously stripped of anything that might challenge the pre-baked narrative. They know suckers like you won't question the slop they feed you, since it strokes your biases perfectly. That's what I call low-resolution thinking, a common problem we face in today's political warriors like yourself.

For example, take a favorite fairy tale like women unfairly being underpaid compared to men. Some agenda-pushing editor cherry-picks a "FACT," slaps a stat on it, and morons like you scarf it down, thinking you're suddenly a scholar. Newsflash: those "facts" are one variable of at least 20 that need to be understood to get the true answer. I'd break it down, but you'd just barf up more drivel and throw out 'projection!' again, like a predictable puppet.

Stop being a lapdog for the narrative peddlers and grow some balls. I wrote about some very basic and real economics, grounded in history and market mechanics, simple and basic concepts that history proves. Trump's setting us up for explosive growth that'll make the OMB's projections look like a toddler's doodle. He's fixing the wreckage libtards left behind, strengthening defense for our nation's security, past, present, and future, while slashing the corrupt, wasteful spending that's been robbing Americans blind to quite literally facilitate the destruction of the American way.

The spending you're whining about is mostly either previous commitments that can't be stopped for a variety of reasons or for the previously mentioned fixing the destruction from the Biden nightmare. Trump is ensuring that we are the clear and dominant leader economically and as the undisputed king of lethal military dominance in the world. His tariffs and growth alone will cover that bill entirely. Keep in mind the things he is spending on are actually authorized in our Constitution unlike the majority of spending for many decades, things we should actually be spending on. Granted, we are a long way from solving the many problems we're facing, but he's getting us on the right track, growth and reducing fraud and waste alone is a great start in the right direction. Let's see what things look like in the next few years, otherwise known as the future. You seem to be burdened by what was, lol.

All of that said, I'd be happy to discuss any one specific line item that 'Trump' is spending from that killer article or any article for that matter. I'd be happy to do a deep dive beyond level one of your low-resolution thinking and see if we can come to a conclusion that verifies your complaint. Will you? No, of course not. I'll get some 3rd grade insult and a complaint about how many words this reply is, claiming you wouldn't waste your time reading it, or ignoring the challenge because I missed the point. lol. No worries, I got the point, the point is you want to bitch and claim your standing on a mountain of 'facts' and anyone not seeing it, is a moron. Or you'll just cry 'projection' again. lmao
Click to expand...
tl dr


2 sentences in and you are a retard with nothing but a straw man argument

actual expenditures are not projections dipshit. words mean things dipshit
 
EdwinA said:
Defense spending should be tripled, just to make up for decades of cuts. Henry George had a great idea, which was a national tax on real estate, but unlike his idea, it should be solely devoted to national defense, i.e. military and border patrol funding. Now that the GOP establishment has its trained parrots running around channeling Jane Fonda and fighting over who gets to lick her ankles, we are not seeing any real increase, and a ta critical time in history. This of course only increased the chance of big wars, not decreased it, same as it always has in the past. WE saw the results of cuts under Obama and his appeasement policies; only idiots will demand the U.S. repeat that atrocity.
Click to expand...
nah.

when you deep state fucks are over-funded you create wars.

go eat dicks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top