‘Trump got f*cked’— Trump’s Inner Circle Drop F-Bomb After ‘Failure’ Putin Summit: ‘Trump left Alaska as the loser, and those in the president’s camp

Maze

Wie boter op zijn hoofd heeft, moet uit de zon bli

President Donald Trump has tried to put a positive spin on his “failure” of a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but things are not as rosy behind the scenes.

Longtime Trump biographer Michael Wolff tells The Daily Beast Podcast that a member of the president’s inner circle texted him bluntly on Friday: “Fucked.”

The insider did not elaborate.

However, Wolff noted that it is clear that Trump left Alaska as the loser, and those in the president’s camp surely know it, too.

“Trump got fucked,” he said, agreeing with The Washington Post’s assessment that the summit was more pomp than substance. “We got nothing out of this. This is, you know, this is really, really a loss for Trump, and potentially a loss for Ukraine.”

Trump, 79, raised eyebrows from the moment he arrived in Anchorage, starting with his team ordering U.S. airmen to roll out a red carpet to welcome Putin.

Trump, after meandering his way to a meeting point, applauded Putin as he approached. F-35 fighter jets and a B-2 bomber completed a flyover. The men shook hands, smiled, and Trump invited the former KGB officer to take a ride inside the “Beast,” his presidential limo. Once inside, they smiled and waved out the windows.

It was a grand welcome for a leader who invaded a U.S. ally, causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands and the displacement of millions more. And what, exactly, did Trump gain from offering this extravagant PR gift to the Kremlin?

Practically nothing, Wolff says.

“It was a failure,” he stated. “There is nothing that [Trump] could say. So he decided to, and remember, he threatened, ‘If we don’t get a deal, I’m going to walk away. I’m going to do tariffs. I’m going to do, you know, all of this.’ No, he did not do that. Instead, he basically embraced Vladimir Putin.”

Critics of the president noted that he appeared “defeated” after emerging from his meeting with Putin. The two leaders briefly sat for what was billed as a “press conference,” but no questions were answered.

Podcast Co-host and Daily Beast Chief Content Officer Joanna Coles said that Trump’s relative silence at the news conference was particularly telling given that he is usually not one to pass up answering questions from shouting reporters. She added of Trump’s cuddling up to Putin: “It’s embarrassing and it’s dirty.”

Ultimately, though, Trump had not received assurances of a ceasefire, which is what he said he sought to achieve by scheduling the high-profile meeting.

With his original objective dashed, Trump moved the goalposts. He claimed the summit was a success and that he no longer wants a ceasefire agreement, as they “oftentimes do not hold up.” That is likely unwelcome news to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has been adamant that a peace deal cannot be reached until a ceasefire is put in place.

Sources told Axios that Trump called Zelensky to break the bad news while making the 3,500-mile trek home from Alaska on Air Force One, where Trump also sat for an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity.

Trump and Zelensky spoke for an hour and a half in what Axios’ source described as a “difficult” conversation. Other European leaders joined the call in its final half hour, but their reactions were not recorded in the report.

Zelensky is due to travel to D.C. to meet Trump on Monday to discuss his country’s increasingly dire situation further. By then, it will have been six months since his last visit, when Trump and Vice President JD Vance chastised him in an Oval Office ambush that famously went off the rails.

In the meantime, the world is talking about Trump and Putin instead of Trump and the convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, which Wolff and Coles speculated may have been an intentional move by the White House.

Still, Wolff cautioned Trump that fervor regarding his association with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein is not going anywhere—no matter what sort of distractions may crop up. Trump has faced backlash from his supporters after his administration concluded Epstein died by suicide in prison, rather than being murdered, and no “client list” of wealthy co-conspirators exists—the subject of whirling conspiracies among his base.

“That’s the thing about the Epstein [scandal],” Wolff said. “You just can’t shake it off. It sticks.”
 

Alaska meeting expectations​


alaska-meeting-expectations-v0-i1qmdud208jf1.png
 
Does trump deserve a Nobel Prize for honoring Putin?
Putin is a head of State, NRW.

Get a clue.

He is deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize for his previous success in stopping wars.
www.newsweek.com › map-which-countries-trump-nobelMap of countries that have nominated Donald Trump for Nobel ...

Aug 13, 2025 · President Donald Trump has been publicly backed for the Nobel Peace Prize by the leaders of multiple countries following a series of high-profile diplomatic engagements hosted at the White House ...
www.foxnews.com › politics › president-peace-trumpTrump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize by GOP lawmakers for ...

3 days ago · House GOP representatives nominate Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, citing his efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war and other diplomatic achievements.


Get a clue.
 
Putin is a head of State, NRW.

Get a clue.

He is deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize for his previous success in stopping wars.
www.newsweek.com › map-which-countries-trump-nobelMap of countries that have nominated Donald Trump for Nobel ...

Aug 13, 2025 · President Donald Trump has been publicly backed for the Nobel Peace Prize by the leaders of multiple countries following a series of high-profile diplomatic engagements hosted at the White House ...
www.foxnews.com › politics › president-peace-trumpTrump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize by GOP lawmakers for ...

3 days ago · House GOP representatives nominate Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, citing his efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war and other diplomatic achievements.


Get a clue.

What happened to Day 1? What happened to quickly & easily, with one phone call?

Putin knows how to play Trump. It's actually sad to watch.
 
So, Zelensky was not in Alaska, NRW.

Nor was "Zelenskyy."
Peace talks without allowing the victim to talk... Not exactly peace talks.

His name is transliterated to Zelenskyy, because that gives the best approximation of how it is pronounced. It really is not something I would be willing to argue.
 
Peace talks without allowing the victim to talk... Not exactly peace talks.

His name is transliterated to Zelenskyy, because that gives the best approximation of how it is pronounced. It really is not something I would be willing to argue.
Nah, they add an extra "y" to distinguish it from the regular spelling for a Russian name. They pretend that Ukrainian and Russian are different languages. This would only be true if English of a century ago and now were different languages. Believe me, these folks can hold conversations with each other without switching "languages"... The Soviets changed the alphabet from 36 to 33 letters, which was down from the original 43 that Cyril and Methodius created, the Ukrainians use i, usually where you might find the Й in a Russian word, things like that.

Though I will say that Russians have a harder time hearing the Ukrainian dialect as they pronounce words differently and use some old grammar that Russian has stopped using. This would be a bit like hearing an older version of English, sometimes you speak the same language, but still have a difficult time getting your meaning across.

Kiev... is also pronounced "Kee-yev"... like it has always been. I have listened to Ukrainians saying the word. We just spell it Kyiv nowadays and pronounce it wrong to say it is "different" and not a Russian thing...
 
Nah, they add an extra "y" to distinguish it from the regular spelling for a Russian name.
No, it is pronounced with a "ea(short a)" in both languages, but in Ukrainian, the "ea" is more pronounced. So if you are transliterating from Ukrainian it is two y's. If you are transliterating from Russian, it used to be one y, but now it is two i's. I have a cousin who will talk for hours about transliteration, and how it has changed over the years... It really is not that interesting to me.

They pretend that Ukrainian and Russian are different languages.
They are two completely different languages, in the same family of languages. It is like comparing English and Dutch.

This would only be true if English of a century ago and now were different languages.
It would be like saying English of 1,100 years ago was the same as modern English. It is impossible to understand Old English.

Believe me, these folks can hold conversations with each other without switching "languages"...
Not true. It is impossible to understand Ukrainian if you only speak Russian. Almost all older Ukrainian speakers also speak Russian, but the younger ones who only speak Ukrainian cannot understand Russian.

Kiev... is also pronounced "Kee-yev"
Kyiv is now transliterated as Kyiv, not because it has changed its name, or it's pronunciation, but because we have a better transliteration. It is similar to Beijing in that way.

Once again, transliteration does not really interest me that much. The people who develop transliteration are just trying to get the pronunciation more accurate. It will never be 100% accurate, but can often be improved.

Some of the transliterations in the past have been absolutely terrible: Moses, Salem, Rome, Paris, etc. It should be closer to Moshe, Shalom, Roma, Pari.

The single worst is Spanish. No where in the Spanish language do they have an "sp" in the front of a word. Spanish is clearly not a Spanish word, and is extremely difficult for Spanish speakers to pronounce.
 
No, it is pronounced with a "ea(short a)" in both languages, but in Ukrainian, the "ea" is more pronounced. So if you are transliterating from Ukrainian it is two y's. If you are transliterating from Russian, it used to be one y, but now it is two i's. I have a cousin who will talk for hours about transliteration, and how it has changed over the years... It really is not that interesting to me.


They are two completely different languages, in the same family of languages. It is like comparing English and Dutch.
It really isn't, I speak Russian and hold conversations with Ukrainians regularly. It is not even close to "like English and Dutch" it is more like Olde English and Modern English.
It would be like saying English of 1,100 years ago was the same as modern English. It is impossible to understand Old English.


Not true. It is impossible to understand Ukrainian if you only speak Russian. Almost all older Ukrainian speakers also speak Russian, but the younger ones who only speak Ukrainian cannot understand Russian.
That is not true. There are some folks that cannot "hear" it well, but it is not "impossible" to understand them.
Kyiv is now transliterated as Kyiv, not because it has changed its name, or it's pronunciation, but because we have a better transliteration. It is similar to Beijing in that way.
Rubbish. I listen to both Russian and Ukrainians pronouncing the word, it is better transliterated as Kiev... It would be how I transliterated it as a translator in the Navy back in the day, and would again be the way I would do it today. I have heard it in both "languages" it is the same.
Once again, transliteration does not really interest me that much. The people who develop transliteration are just trying to get the pronunciation more accurate. It will never be 100% accurate, but can often be improved.

Some of the transliterations in the past have been absolutely terrible: Moses, Salem, Rome, Paris, etc. It should be closer to Moshe, Shalom, Roma, Pari.

The single worst is Spanish. No where in the Spanish language do they have an "sp" in the front of a word. Spanish is clearly not a Spanish word, and is extremely difficult for Spanish speakers to pronounce.
Regardless of this. You are trying to teach your grandfather how to suck eggs. I literally speak the language and part of my job was transliterating the language when I was in the Navy.
 

President Donald Trump has tried to put a positive spin on his “failure” of a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but things are not as rosy behind the scenes.

Longtime Trump biographer Michael Wolff tells The Daily Beast Podcast that a member of the president’s inner circle texted him bluntly on Friday: “Fucked.”

The insider did not elaborate.

However, Wolff noted that it is clear that Trump left Alaska as the loser, and those in the president’s camp surely know it, too.

“Trump got fucked,” he said, agreeing with The Washington Post’s assessment that the summit was more pomp than substance. “We got nothing out of this. This is, you know, this is really, really a loss for Trump, and potentially a loss for Ukraine.”

Trump, 79, raised eyebrows from the moment he arrived in Anchorage, starting with his team ordering U.S. airmen to roll out a red carpet to welcome Putin.

Trump, after meandering his way to a meeting point, applauded Putin as he approached. F-35 fighter jets and a B-2 bomber completed a flyover. The men shook hands, smiled, and Trump invited the former KGB officer to take a ride inside the “Beast,” his presidential limo. Once inside, they smiled and waved out the windows.

It was a grand welcome for a leader who invaded a U.S. ally, causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands and the displacement of millions more. And what, exactly, did Trump gain from offering this extravagant PR gift to the Kremlin?

Practically nothing, Wolff says.

“It was a failure,” he stated. “There is nothing that [Trump] could say. So he decided to, and remember, he threatened, ‘If we don’t get a deal, I’m going to walk away. I’m going to do tariffs. I’m going to do, you know, all of this.’ No, he did not do that. Instead, he basically embraced Vladimir Putin.”

Critics of the president noted that he appeared “defeated” after emerging from his meeting with Putin. The two leaders briefly sat for what was billed as a “press conference,” but no questions were answered.

Podcast Co-host and Daily Beast Chief Content Officer Joanna Coles said that Trump’s relative silence at the news conference was particularly telling given that he is usually not one to pass up answering questions from shouting reporters. She added of Trump’s cuddling up to Putin: “It’s embarrassing and it’s dirty.”

Ultimately, though, Trump had not received assurances of a ceasefire, which is what he said he sought to achieve by scheduling the high-profile meeting.

With his original objective dashed, Trump moved the goalposts. He claimed the summit was a success and that he no longer wants a ceasefire agreement, as they “oftentimes do not hold up.” That is likely unwelcome news to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has been adamant that a peace deal cannot be reached until a ceasefire is put in place.

Sources told Axios that Trump called Zelensky to break the bad news while making the 3,500-mile trek home from Alaska on Air Force One, where Trump also sat for an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity.

Trump and Zelensky spoke for an hour and a half in what Axios’ source described as a “difficult” conversation. Other European leaders joined the call in its final half hour, but their reactions were not recorded in the report.

Zelensky is due to travel to D.C. to meet Trump on Monday to discuss his country’s increasingly dire situation further. By then, it will have been six months since his last visit, when Trump and Vice President JD Vance chastised him in an Oval Office ambush that famously went off the rails.

In the meantime, the world is talking about Trump and Putin instead of Trump and the convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, which Wolff and Coles speculated may have been an intentional move by the White House.

Still, Wolff cautioned Trump that fervor regarding his association with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein is not going anywhere—no matter what sort of distractions may crop up. Trump has faced backlash from his supporters after his administration concluded Epstein died by suicide in prison, rather than being murdered, and no “client list” of wealthy co-conspirators exists—the subject of whirling conspiracies among his base.

“That’s the thing about the Epstein [scandal],” Wolff said. “You just can’t shake it off. It sticks.”

Apparently, Chinatown is incapable of posting a single thought. It's nothing but copy/paste for this communist loser. Hey Chinatown, this isn't some Reddit thread for articles, it's for debate, which requires at least a couple of words from you, dumbass. Oh wait, you don't know English, right? Maybe you should do us all a favor and self-deport.
 
It really isn't, I speak Russian and hold conversations with Ukrainians regularly. It is not even close to "like English and Dutch" it is more like Olde English and Modern English.
I actually studied Old English. It is closer to German than to Modern English. It is virtually impossible for a Modern English speaker to understand.

I have reached the end of my willingness to debate transliteration. I doubt you are a good Russian speaker, if you do not know that the advancements in transliteration have made the words more accurate... But I really do not care enough to talk about it more.
 
I actually studied Old English. It is closer to German than to Modern English. It is virtually impossible for a Modern English speaker to understand.

I have reached the end of my willingness to debate transliteration. I doubt you are a good Russian speaker, if you do not know that the advancements in transliteration have made the words more accurate... But I really do not care enough to talk about it more.
You keep saying that, but I would say more like the "thee and thou" English than the one you are thinking of, regardless you keep saying "impossible"... and you are terribly wrong on this one, like you are on nearly everything. I'd have a terrible time holding conversations with my friend Yan (Transliterated)... if it was "impossible" for me to understand someone speaking Ukrainian.

This word "impossible", I do not think it means what you think it means....

1755902744619.png

Some difficulties from those who speak Russian understanding Ukrainian as they use some grammar cases that are old (well one, vocative case), but this "impossible" thing, not so much.

I've also had zero problems reading the language though the alphabets are slightly different.
 
Nah, they add an extra "y" to distinguish it from the regular spelling for a Russian name. They pretend that Ukrainian and Russian are different languages. This would only be true if English of a century ago and now were different languages. Believe me, these folks can hold conversations with each other without switching "languages"... The Soviets changed the alphabet from 36 to 33 letters, which was down from the original 43 that Cyril and Methodius created, the Ukrainians use i, usually where you might find the Й in a Russian word, things like that.

Though I will say that Russians have a harder time hearing the Ukrainian dialect as they pronounce words differently and use some old grammar that Russian has stopped using. This would be a bit like hearing an older version of English, sometimes you speak the same language, but still have a difficult time getting your meaning across.

Kiev... is also pronounced "Kee-yev"... like it has always been. I have listened to Ukrainians saying the word. We just spell it Kyiv nowadays and pronounce it wrong to say it is "different" and not a Russian thing...

Shortest week I've ever seen. I remember when a week was 7 days, must be shrinkflation....
 
Back
Top