AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
You are consumed with mental disease.
So the Smithsonian can’t show that slavery was bad?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Libhater
Verified User
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed with bipartisan support from both Democrats and Republicans, though it was strongly
opposed by many racist Southern Democrats. At that time (1964) the Democrat party included a powerful Southern bloc that
supported segregation. Oh how biden misses the KKK giant of the late senator Robert Byrd.
In similar fashion the Democrats of New England (especially from Boston Taxachusetts) are segregating/protecting their sanctuary
city-state criminal brown people from Trump's FBI and I.C.E. agents.
Diesel
Well-known member
I do? You're online at 4:00 in the morning blacked out drunk and higher than a kite openly fantasizing about the fake teacher cow that lives in Ohio and fucking your biological sister. Has your daughter who refuses to speak to you seen what you post here? How about your wife whom you call "the slut"?
Even America's slaves fared better than the average European peasant and laborer. Leftists are infuriated by such real life facts.
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
TOP
Retired Teacher
It took a long time for you to think that up.. I know you're busy... So nicely done....
I've already explained what I think should be additions to any exhibits about Slavery or African American history ... Is in quite a few posts...You'll have to ask Jared about "sides"...He's the one that brought used those terms.... Which is why I mentioned it the one time...
Took me 5 seconds. Still a dodge from you. You said there are "good things that come from slavery".It took a long time for you to think that up.. I know you're busy... So nicely done....
Own what you said or don't. It matters not to me.
It depends on what side of slavery you are on. The plantations got cheap unprotected labor that increased profits bigly.
You know nothing of what America was like back then. The Dems of the south were called Dixiecrats. They were Dems in name only, but voted along with Repubs in the House and Senate, The Dems policies were fought hard by Dixiecrats. Once the Civil Rights acts were pased, they fled to the Repub party. They were Repubs in policy for many years. It was where they belonged.
In the 1700's, the average American ate 360 pounds of meat per year. In Europe the average peasant was luck to eat 22 pounds per year. Over 75% of American farmers owned their farms. These days the average worker can't afford a crappy little house.
Slaves came over in the same conditions the average European peasant traveled in, in 'steerage'. They also fared much better here than the average European peasant who stayed in Europe. After the 1820's, the average height of Americans of 3rd generation English lost 15% of their average heights and the average lifespan also shrunk 15%.
To understand what life and politics were like in the Founding Era, and why it's radially different today, you need real history, not bullshit propaganda from loony ideologues on either wing. Original intent matters re the Constitution, but both 'sides' are corporatist shills now; 'Marxism' and 'laisseze faire' are distinctions without a difference in results for the vast majority of people. Jefferson understood very well what would happen when Wall Street took over govt., hence his drive to remove the Federal capital out of New York City.
Slaves came over in the same conditions the average European peasant traveled in, in 'steerage'. They also fared much better here than the average European peasant who stayed in Europe. After the 1820's, the average height of Americans of 3rd generation English lost 15% of their average heights and the average lifespan also shrunk 15%.
To understand what life and politics were like in the Founding Era, and why it's radially different today, you need real history, not bullshit propaganda from loony ideologues on either wing. Original intent matters re the Constitution, but both 'sides' are corporatist shills now; 'Marxism' and 'laisseze faire' are distinctions without a difference in results for the vast majority of people. Jefferson understood very well what would happen when Wall Street took over govt., hence his drive to remove the Federal capital out of New York City.
Last edited:
Another Moron Moment for Nerdburger.
Yankees are still embarrassed over a alleged 'hick racist Texan' accomplishing what they refused to do for decades.
I ain't embarrassed...
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
I betcha if Trump and/or Reichwing media said so, she'd be bleating the good side of the Holocaust, too.
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
It took a long time for you to think that up.. I know you're busy... So nicely done....
Could you please pass the ranch dressing to put on this word salad? Thanks.
</pity response>
No, they'd be DENYING The Holocaust!
The liberal establishment was, and still is, hence why they keep whining about 'rubbish like 'Confederate statues and flags n stuff!!!', never mind only a few states were subjected to the Voting Rights hoaxes that followed the Civil Rights battles in Congress. In fact California, New York and other states outside the South got to keep their 'literacy tests and other racist policies; Harlem for instance had black turnouts as bad or worse than Mississippi's. It was Richard Nixon who made that legislation applicable nationwide, i.e. Rockefeller Republicans finishing what LBJ started. We got to see riots in liberal Democratic Massachusetts over blacks being bused to liberal white schools there, complete with Democrats throwing bricks at school busses. They were fine with Feds running over southerners, but then got all butt hurt when it came their turn. Typical hypocrites, and still are to thsi day. They still run those fake smear jobs on LBJ to this day, along with the GOP, never mind it Was Republicans who made it national.
AI Overview
Yes, during the Boston busing crisis of the mid-1970s, acts of violence—including school buses being firebombed—were part of the intense, and at times brutal, white resistance to court-ordered school desegregation
. These attacks were part of a larger pattern of racial violence that plagued the city during that period.
Key events and details of the crisis:
- Federal court order: In June 1974, U.S. District Court Judge W. Arthur Garrity Jr. ruled that the Boston School Committee had intentionally maintained segregation. To remedy this, he ordered the desegregation of Boston's schools by busing students between predominantly Black and white neighborhoods.
- Initial violence: When busing began on September 12, 1974, buses carrying Black students were met with angry crowds of white protesters who threw rocks, bricks, and bottles.
- Firebombings and other incidents:
- Some Black families living in predominantly white areas, like East Boston, had their homes firebombed.
- A prominent photo from the era, called The Soiling of Old Glory, documented a white teenager attacking a Black man with an American flag on City Hall Plaza.
- In December 1975, a Black student was stabbed at South Boston High School, prompting a mob of white residents to trap Black students inside the school until police intervened.
Last edited: