Virginia Giuffre's tell all memoir to be published on Oct 21st, detailing her time with Epstein and his "many friends"

Damocles warned.
That he did.
Are you saying he doesn't understand his own rule?
I'm saying that, within the realm of all online forums, it definitely wouldn't be the first time that I have ever noticed such a thing occur.

DebatePolitics is a PRIME example of a forum's moderators who (purposely, in that case) don't understand their own rules. PoliticalForum is another one in which the moderators not only don't understand their own rules, but they also purposely word some of their rules in a very vague manner so that no one else can actually understand them either. Ultimately, it's their forums, so it's their rules as they interpret them (whether I like/agree/approve of their decisions or not).

As far as Damocles (and JPP) goes, his rules are generally pretty clear and (whenever they are enforced) he generally enforces them pretty well (and is even willing to explain his reasoning and where "the line" is drawn), not that he needs or gives a shit about my general approval. It's his forum, so it's ultimately his rules as he interprets them (whether I like/agree/approve of his decisions or not).
 
That he did.

I'm saying that, within the realm of all online forums, it definitely wouldn't be the first time that I have ever noticed such a thing occur.

DebatePolitics is a PRIME example of a forum's moderators who (purposely, in that case) don't understand their own rules. PoliticalForum is another one in which the moderators not only don't understand their own rules, but they also purposely word some of their rules in a very vague manner so that no one else can actually understand them either. Ultimately, it's their forums, so it's their rules as they interpret them (whether I like/agree/approve of their decisions or not).

As far as Damocles (and JPP) goes, his rules are generally pretty clear and (whenever they are enforced) he generally enforces them pretty well (and is even willing to explain his reasoning and where "the line" is drawn), not that he needs or gives a shit about my general approval. It's his forum, so it's ultimately his rules as he interprets them (whether I like/agree/approve of his decisions or not).
@IBDaMann called the poster sick-o for wanting child porn to be released. It is clear.
 
... and what do those files contain? (The Pam Bondi video couldn't be any more clear about it)...
... and what do those files contain? (The Pam Bondi video couldn't be any more clear about it)...
Funny that she never mentioned that all files were child porn in the first place. Videos are clearly marked.

All of sudden ALL of files are child porn according to MAGAts.

Again, the poster asked for files that contain information that implicate people. She never asked for child porn to be released. That's an accusation along with calling her sick-o which is a clear 12b violation. Reread rule 12b for clarification.
 
Funny that she never mentioned that all files were child porn in the first place. Videos are clearly marked.

All of sudden ALL of files are child porn according to MAGAts.

Again, the poster asked for files that contain information that implicate people. She never asked for child porn to be released. That's an accusation along with calling her sick-o which is a clear 12b violation. Reread rule 12b for clarification.
It's been reported over and over again. They don't care.
 
Not what MAGA means, anchovies. You still seem to be having a lot of trouble with this.
The Democrat party is a conspiracy.
MAGA means whatever your Messiah says it means and for years it was that the deep state was hiding dirt in Epstein’s records, and now that he can expose those files, nothing, it is suddenly, “nothing to see.”

As I said, the Epstein’s conspiracy is all MAGA, and the Messiah can’t control it
 
Sure is interesting I got booted real quick and this one can do it over and over again and nothing.
I'm not the one demanding that child porn be released to the public. You are. You know that the "Epstein file" is full of tens of thousands of kiddie porn videos. You insist that they all be released to the public. Once again, you insist that they be released to the public; I'm not the one so insisting.

Would you care to explain why you insist such? Oh, and fuck you.
 
I'm not the one demanding that child porn be released to the public. You are. You know that the "Epstein file" is full of tens of thousands of kiddie porn videos. You insist that they all be released to the public. Once again, you insist that they be released to the public; I'm not the one so insisting.

Would you care to explain why you insist such? Oh, and fuck you.
You are falsely accusing her of wanting child porn to be released. You repeatedly called her sick-o. You keep pushing for 12b.
 
MAGA means whatever your Messiah says it means
I have no Messiah. Now, you, on the other hand, need other people to do your thinking for you. You are nothing more than a mindless attack dog that HATES on command and who attacks as ordered.

Does archives want a Scooby snack? Yes, you do! Good boy!

and for years it was that the deep state was hiding dirt in Epstein’s records,
Nope. For years, the Deep State stored the "Epstein File" hoax at the DOJ, to be trotted out if they needed such a hoax. They filled it with tens of thousands of kiddie porn videos downloaded by Jeffrey Epstein. Now that Democrats are no longer in power, they are ordering their attack dogs to demand that the "Epstein File" hoax be released to the public, knowing that it contains tens of thousands of kiddie porn videos.

Are you demanding that the "Epstein File" be released to the public?

and now that he can expose those files, nothing, it is suddenly, “nothing to see.”
Nope. Pam Bondi explained exactly what those tens of thousands of video files are, i.e. "child porn videos downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein."


As I said, the Epstein’s conspiracy is all MAGA, and the Messiah can’t control it
You're gibbering. The "Epstein File" hoax is what you are promulgating.
 
I have no Messiah. Now, you, on the other hand, need other people to do your thinking for you. You are nothing more than a mindless attack dog that HATES on command and who attacks as ordered.

Does archives want a Scooby snack? Yes, you do! Good boy!


Nope. For years, the Deep State stored the "Epstein File" hoax at the DOJ, to be trotted out if they needed such a hoax. They filled it with tens of thousands of kiddie porn videos downloaded by Jeffrey Epstein. Now that Democrats are no longer in power, they are ordering their attack dogs to demand that the "Epstein File" hoax be released to the public, knowing that it contains tens of thousands of kiddie porn videos.

Are you demanding that the "Epstein File" be released to the public?


Nope. Pam Bondi explained exactly what those tens of thousands of video files are, i.e. "child porn videos downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein."



You're gibbering. The "Epstein File" hoax is what you are promulgating.
Keep pushing for 12b ban.
 
You are falsely accusing her of wanting child porn to be released.
You need to read her posts. You are objectively in error.

You repeatedly called her sick-o.
Are you indicating that I need to refresh everyone's memory? OK. She's a sick-o ... and you are a moron.

You keep pushing for 12b.
I'm seeking to avoid it, yes, if that's a rule ... but we need to understand it clearly, and presently, nobody does, least of all, you.
 
I didn't say I was ignoring you.


You are the 12B violator, as far as I can tell. Let's ask @Damocles directly.

1. You know that the "Epstein file" is full of hundreds of child-porn videos as stated in this video:
View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_cZlkuaS5FM?feature=share


2. Knowing this, you demand that they all be released to the public, i.e.


So, the question for @Damocles is "Should I be reporting this as a 12B violation?"
You should not. Disagreeing with Pam Bondi on what they believe is on the video is not a 12b violation.
 
Back
Top